Comunidades de práctica en la redindicadores y condiciones para su desarrollo

Referencias bibliográficas

• ·Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
• ·Barab, S.A. y Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. En Jonassen, D.H. y Duffy, T.M. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• ·Bielaczyc, K. y Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practices. En Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-292). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• ·Brown, A.L. y Palinscar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. En Resnick, L. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• ·Brown, A. L. y Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. En McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating theory and practice (pp.201-228). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• ·Brown, J. S. y Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unifying view of working, learning, and innovation. En Cohen, M. y Sproull, L.S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 59-82). London: SAGE Publications.
• ·Bruffee, K.A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
• ·Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbuilt (CTGV) (1994). From visual word problems to communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. En McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 157-200). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• ·Collins, A. (1998). Learning communities: A commentary on chapters by Brown, Ellery, and Campione, and by Riel. En Greeno, J. y Goldman, S. (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp: 399-405). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• ·Coombe, K. (1999). Ethics and the learning community. En Retallick, J., Cocklin, B. y Coombe, K. (Eds.), Learning communities in education: Issues, strategies and contexts (pp. 86-104). London: Routledge.
• ·Cutler, R.H. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century 1, 2.
• ·Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education 10:2, 4-36.
• ·Disessa, A. y Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. En Greeno, J. y Goldman, S. (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp.155-188). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• ·Dunlap, J. y Grabinger, R. (2003). Preparing students for lifelong learning: A review of instructional methodologies. Performance Improvement Quarterly 16:2, 6-25.
• ·Etzioni, A. y Etzioni, O. (1997). Communities: Virtual vs. real. Science 277, 295.
• ·Fahy, P.J. (2003). Indicators of Support in Online Interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1:4.
• · Fahy, P., Crawford, G. y Ally, M. (2001). Patterns of Interaction in a Computer Conference Transcript. International of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1:2.
• ·Grabinger, S. y Dunlap, J. (1996). Rich environments for active learning. En Kommers, P., Grabinger, S. y Dunlap, J.C. (Eds.), Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration (pp. 211-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• ·Graves, L.N. (1992). Cooperative learning communities: Context for a new vision of education and society. Journal of Education 17: 2, 57-79.
• · Greeno, J.G. y Goldman, S.V. (1998). Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• ·Hare, A.P. y Davies, M.F. (1994). Social interaction. En Hare, P., Blumberg, H.H., Davies, M.F. y Kent, M.V. (Eds.), Small group research: A handbook (pp. 169-193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• ·Heift, T. y Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments: a case study in French, Educational Technology and Society, 3:3, 208-214.
• · Hiltz, S.R. (1998). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities, en WEB98 (Orlando, Florida) Ver http://eies.njit.edu/~hiltz/collaborative_learning_in_asynch.htm (12-10-03).
• ·Jonassen, D., Peck, K. y Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
• ·Lawrence, R.L. (1997). Building a learning community. En Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing and community education (Michigan State University). Ver http://nlu.nl.edu/ace/Resources/Documents/LearnCommunity.html (22-10-04)
• ·Ludwig-hardman, S. (2003). Case study: Instructional design strategies that contribute to the
• development of online learning community. Denver: University of Colorado. Tesis doctoral inédita.
• ·Ludwig-hardman, S. y Dunlap, J.C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: scaffolding for success, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4:1.
• ·Kerka, S. (1996). Distance learning, the Internet, and the world wide web, en ERIC Digest (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 214).
• ·McMahon, T.A. (1997). From isolation to interaction? Network-based professional development and teacher professional communication, Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 257).
• · McMillan, D.W. y Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory, Journal of Community Psychology, 14:1, 6-23.
• ·Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. En Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.
• ·Recker, M., Olson, D., Rogers, J., Debry, D., Du Plessis, J. y Hayden, R.M. (2000). Communities of Practice: A Thinking Practices Framework for Instructional Technology, AERA, 24-28 April. New Orleans.
• ·Retallick, J. (1999). Transforming schools into learning communities. En Retallick, J., Cocklin, B. y Coombe, K (Eds.), Learning communities in education: Issues, strategies and contexts (pp. 107-130). London: Routledge.
• ·Rourke, L. y Anderson, T. (2002). Using Web-Based, Group Communication Systems to Support Case Study Learning at a Distance, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3:6.
• ·Rovai, A.P. (2002). Building Sense of Community at a Distance, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1:3.
• ·Rovai, A. P., Lucking, R. A. y Cristol, D. (2001). Sense of Classroom Community Index. Documento sin publicar.
• · Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. y Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. En McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• · Scime, R. (1994). Cyberville and the spirit of community: Howard Rheingold-meet Amitai Etzioni. Ver www.imagination.org/cyberville/cyberville.html (30-11-02).
• ·Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.
• ·Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• ·Tirado, R. (2002). Los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Bases para una didáctica del conocimiento. Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
• ·Tirado, R. (2003). Teleformación ocupacional. Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
• ·Tirado, R., Guzmán, M.D. y Toscano, M. (2005). El proyecto Stopdrogas. La teleformación como espacio formativo intercultural interuniversitario, Comunicación y Pedagogía, 203, 58-63.
• ·Tirado, R. y otros (2007). Comunidades virtuales de aprendizaje en el Prácticum de Educación Social. En Fonseca, M.C. y Aguaded, J.I. (Eds.), Enseñar en la Universidad (pp. 217-230). La Coruña: Netbiblo.
• ·Twigg, C.A. (1997). Is technology a silver bullet?, Educom Review, March-April, 28-29.
• ·Wasson, B. y Morch, A.I. (2000). Identifying collaboration patterns in collaborative telelearning scenarios, Educational Technology and Society, 3, 3. (http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_3_2000/c04.htm)(30-02-04).
• ·Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction to networks in the global village. En Wellman, B. (Ed), Networks in the Global Village (pp. 1-48). Boulder: CO, Westview Press.
• ·Wells, P. (1999). Different and equal: Fostering interdependence in a learning community. En Retallick, J., Cocklin, B. y Coombe, K. (Eds.), Learning communities in education: Issues, strategies and contexts. London: Routledge.
• ·Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ·Westheimer, J. y Kahne, J. (1993). Building school communities: An experience-based model, Phi Delta Kappan 75:4, 324-328.
• ·Wilson, B.G., Ludwing-hardman, S., Thornam, C.L. y Dunlap, J.C. (2005). Bounded Community: Designing and Facilitating Learning Communities in Formal Courses, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3:5. (www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/204) (12-12-06).