Las presiones institucionales del entorno medioambientalaplicación a los campos de golf

  1. Riquel Ligero, Francisco José
  2. Vargas Sánchez, Alfonso
Revista:
Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa

ISSN: 1019-6838

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 29-38

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.REDEE.2012.04.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alcantara, L, Mitsuhashi, H., y Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12 (4), 389-407. (Pubitemid 44817599)
  • Aldrich, H., y Fiol, C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 645-670.
  • Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T., y Hughes, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447-471. (Pubitemid 38341250)
  • Ann, G., Zailani, S., y Whaid, A. (2006). A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms' performance in Malaysia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17 (1), 73-93. (Pubitemid 43089144)
  • Aragón, J., y Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (1), 71-88. (Pubitemid 36161245)
  • Aragón, J., y Rubio, E. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40, 357-381.
  • Ayuso, S. (2003). Turismo sostenible: ¿reto o ilusión? Disponible en: www.ecotropia.com [consultado 12 Oct 2009].
  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C, y Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Square (PLS). Approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2 (2), 285-309.
  • Bansal, P., y Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 717-736.
  • Barringer, M., y Milkovich, G. (1998). A theoretical exploration of the adoption and design of flexible benefits plans. A case of human resource innovation. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 305-324.
  • Beaumont, J., Peterson, L., y Whitaker, B. (1993). Managing the environment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Berger, P., y Luckman, T. (1967). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.
  • Boons, F., y Strannegard, L (2000). Organizations coping with their natural environment. A laboratory for institutionalization. International Studies of Management Organizations, 30 (3), 7-17.
  • Brint, S., y Karabel, J. (1991). Institutional origins and transformation: the case of the American community colleges. The new institutionalism in the organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bosch, R., Serra, J., y Vallespino, F. (1998). Turismo y medio ambiente. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces.
  • Bozeman, B. (1993). Understanding the roots of publicness. In B. Sutton (Ed.), The legitimate corporation (pp. 63-81). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Burt, R. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (6), 1287-1335.
  • Buysse, K., y Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (5), 453-470.
  • Brío, J., y Junquera, B. (2001). Medio ambiente y empresa: de la confrontación a la oportunidad. Madrid: Civitas.
  • Camisón, C. (2010). Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: Empirical evidence in Spain. European Management Journal, 28, 346-361.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 3 (32), 946-967.
  • Chin W. (1998). The partial least square approach to structural equation modelling. En: Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. 295-336.
  • Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., y Newsted, P. N. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14 (2), 189-217.
  • Claver, E., y Molina, J. (2000). Medio ambiente, estrategia empresarial y competiti-vidad. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 9 (1), 119-138.
  • Confederación de Empresarios de Andalucía (1999). Informe de turismo de golf. Sevilla: CEA.
  • Cordeiro, J., y Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earning forecast. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6 (2), 104-114. (Pubitemid 27476759)
  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., y Morard, B. (1993). The impact of corporate pollution on market valuation: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 8 (2), 135-155.
  • Dasgupta, P. (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital. In P. Dasgupta, y I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: a multifacted perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Deephouse, D. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 1024-1039.
  • Díez, F., Blanco, A., y Prado, P. (2010). Medición de la legitimidad organizativa el caso de las sociedades de garantía recíproca. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas, 43, 115-144.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., y Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., y Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Elsbach, K. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The constructions and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88.
  • Elsayed, K., y Paton, D. (2004). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16 (3), 395-412.
  • Esty, D., y Winston, A. (2006). Green to gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate. Create value and build competitive advantage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Falk, R., y Miller, N. (1992). A primer soft modelling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.
  • Fernández ML. Un análisis institucional del contexto y su incidencia en el proceso de cambio en la gestión de los recursos humanos. Tres estudios de casos. Tesis doctoral. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz; 2001.
  • Fernández, M., y Valle, R. (1998). El enfoque neoinstitucional como marco teórico explicativo en la gestión de recursos humanos. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 4 (2), 93-112.
  • Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms 1919-1979. In W. W. Powell, y P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 311-336). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Florida, R., y Davison, D. (2001). Gaining from green management: Environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review, 43 (3), 64-84.
  • Fornell, C, y Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistic. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 39-50.
  • Frankenberger, S. (2006). Management of regulatory influences on corporate strategy and structure. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag. Wiesbaden: GWV Fachverla-geGmbH.
  • Galaskiewicz, J., y Wasseman, N. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interor-ganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Sciencie Quartely, 34 (3), 454-479.
  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). Making corporate actor accountable: Institution building in Mineapolis-St. Paul. In W. Powel, y P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Garcés, C, Rivera, P., y Murillo, J. (2006). Análisis de las potenciales ventajas com-petitivas del comportamiento estratégico medioambiental de las empresas industriales de Aragón [Documentode trabajo]. Zaragoza: Fundación Economía Aragonesa.
  • García, F., y Armas, M. (2007). Aproximación a la incidencia de la responsa-bilidad social-medioambiental en el rendimiento económico de la empresa hotelera española. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16 (1), 47-66.
  • Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 320-328.
  • Gilley, K., Worrel, D., y El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance. Journal of Management, 26, 1199-1216.
  • Gómez-Lama, M., Priego, R., Recio, J. M., y Berbel, J. (1994). Valoración ambiental de los campos de golf de Andalucía. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba, Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • González, J., y González, O. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega, 33, 1-15.
  • Guimaraes, T., y Liska, K. (1995). Exploring the business benefits of environmental stewardship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4 (1), 9-22.
  • Hall, C. (2000). Tourism planning: polices. processes and relationships. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
  • Hart, S., y Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between pollution prevention and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37. (Pubitemid 27046719)
  • Hefu, L., Weiling, K., Kwok, K., Jibao, G., y Huaping, G. (2010). The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet-enable supply chain management system Journal of Operations Management, 28, 372-374.
  • Hennings, C. (2007). Institution. En: Ritzer, G. (Ed.), Blackewell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Disponible en: http://www.blackwellreference.com/ subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405124331chink-g8978140512433115ss150 [consultado 14 Nov 2009].
  • Henriques, I., y Sadorsky, P. (1995). The determinants of firms that formulate environmental plans. Empirical studies on the interface between nature and organizations. Greenwich: JAI Press., 67-98
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C, y Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least square path modelling in international marketing. En: Rudolf, I., Sinkovics, R., y Pervez, N. (Eds.), Advance in international marketing, Vol. 20. Bingley: Emerald, p. 277-319.
  • Heugens, P., y Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (1), 61-85.
  • Hillary, R. (2003). Environmental management system and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaver Production, 20, 1-19.
  • Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 351-371.
  • Hoffman, A., y Ventresca, M. (2002). Organizations, policy and the natural environment: institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Hunt CS., AldrichH.E. (1996) Why even Rodney Dangerfield has a home page: Legitimizing the world wide web as a medium for commercial endeavours. Congreso Anual de la Academy of Management. Cincinnati, OH.
  • Hunter, C, y Green, H. (1995). Tourism and the environment. A sustainable relations-hip?London: Routledge.
  • Inskeep E. (1991). Tourism planning. An integrated and sustainable approach. Leiper: UNR.
  • Jennings, P., y Zandberguen, P. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4), 1015-1052. (Pubitemid 126003242)
  • John, C. H. S., Cannon, A. R., y Pouder, R.W. (2001). Change drivers in the new millennium: implications for manufacturing strategy research. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 143-160. (Pubitemid 32130378)
  • Johnson, G., y Greenwood, R. (2007). Institutional theory and strategy. In V. Ambro-sini, y M. Jenkins (Eds.), Strategic management: a multiple-perspective approach. London: Palgrave.
  • Judge, W., y Douglas, T. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assess-ment. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (2), 241-262.
  • Jun, L, Qiuzhen, W., y Qingguo, M. (2011). The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: A vendor perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 923-933.
  • Katznelson, I., y Weingast, B. (2005). Intersections between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • King, A., y Lenox, M. (2001). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 698-716.
  • Klassen, R., y McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199-1214. (Pubitemid 126549513)
  • Kostova, T., y Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215-243.
  • Llanas R. Un análisis institucional de la implantación de la Agenda Local 21 por los Ayuntamientos españoles [Tesis doctoral]. Granada: Universidad de Granada; 2005.
  • Llull, G. (2001). Pasos hacia una información contable medioambientalmente obli-gatoria. Partida Doble, 125, 70-72.
  • Link, S., y Naveh, E. (2006). Standardization and discretion: Does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 508-519. (Pubitemid 44680689)
  • Low, B., y Johnston, W. (2008). Securing and managing an organization's network legitimacy: The case of Motorola China Industrial Marketing Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (7), 873-879.
  • Lu, J. W. (2002). Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: Institutional influences on Japanese firms' entry mode choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1), 19-37.
  • Melville, N. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainabi-lity. MIS Quarterly, 34 (1), 1-21.
  • Meyer, J. W., y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
  • Mintzberg, H., y Westley, F. (2000). Sustaining the institutional environment. Organization Studies, 21, 71-94.
  • Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., y Narasimham, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998-1014. (Pubitemid 47285464)
  • Murugesan, S. (2007). Going green with IT: your responsibility toward environmental sustainability. Cutter Consortium Business-IT Strategies Executive Report, 10 (8), 1-24.
  • Navarro, J., y Ruiz, M. (1997). Teoría Institucional y Teoría de la Organización. Anales de Economía y Administración de Empresas, 5, 135-152.
  • Nervés, N., y Aragón, A. (2009). Condicionantes institucionales en la implantación de la formación en la empresa. Tribuna Económica, 85, 121-133.
  • North, D. (1990). Institutions institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic response to the institutional process. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145-179.
  • Oliver, C. (1997). The influence of institutional and task environment relationships on organizational performance: the Canadian construction industry. Journal of Management Studies, 34 (1), 99-124.
  • Ottesen, G., y Gronhaug, K. (2002). Managers' understanding of theoretical concepts: The case of market orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 36(11/12), 1209-1226.
  • Pardella, X., y Padín, C. (2004). La planificación turística sostenible: Un análisis apli-cado al municipio de Caldas de Reis. RevistaGalega de Economía, 3 (1-2), 157-174.
  • Pasamar, S., y Valle, R. (2011). Presiones institucionales para la conciliación de la vida profesional y personal. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas, 14 (4), 258-268.
  • Peris E, Marquina E. Sistemas de gestión ambiental ISO 14000 y EMAS en la ingeniería civil. I Congreso de Ingeniería Civil, Territorio y Medio Ambiente. Madrid, 2002.
  • Pinto, J., Fernández, R., Martínez, L., y Kauffman, G. (2006). Análisis del énfasis en la innovación en la implantación 'Middle-up-down' management model: Un estudio evolutivo en las empresas manufactureras del País Vasco. Aspectos metodológicos y empíricos. Estudios Gerenciales, 10 (22), 37-59.
  • Piñero, P., Quintás, M., y Caballero, G. (2009). Incidencia de la proactividad medioam-biental en el rendimiento de las empresas constructoras. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 18 (2), 79-106.
  • Porter, M., y Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Bussines Review, 73, 120-137.
  • Powell, W., y Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5), 375-405. (Pubitemid 127467823)
  • Priestley, G., y Sabí, J. (1993). El medio ambiente y el golfen Cataluña: problemasy perspectivas. Documents d'Anàlisis Geogràfica, 23, 45-74. (Pubitemid 24390040)
  • Raines, S. (2002). Implementing ISO14001: An international survey assessing the benefits of certification. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9, 418-426. (Pubitemid 36024122)
  • Ramus, C, y Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee 'ecoinitiatives' at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 605-626.
  • Reid, E., y Toffel, M. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (11), 1157-1178.
  • Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., Craig, R., y Carter, C. (2011). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs' social strategies in emerging economies. Journal International Management. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.intman.2011.06.002 [consultado 28 Oct 2011]
  • Rennings, K., Zieglar, A., Ankele, K., y Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57, 45-59.
  • Romero, Q. (2005). Modelo para la evaluación del comportamiento medioambiental: Una aplicación a los campos de golf españoles [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canarias.
  • Roque, V., y Cortez, M. (2006). A divulgação de informação ambiental e a performance financeira das empresas cotadas em Portugal. Revista de Estudos Politécnicos, 3 (5-6), 119-143.
  • Russo, M., y Fouts, P. (1997). A resourse-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534-559.
  • Santizo, C. (2007). El neoinstitucionalismo y las interacciones sociales. Gaceta Ide@s CONCYTEG, 28, 53-61.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Give peace a chance: Reconciling four (not three) 'New Institutionalisms', Department of International Relations, Boston University. Ponencia presentada en la Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Disponible en: http://www.asu.edu/clas/polisci/cqrm/ APSA2006/Schmidt-Peace [consultado 5 Ago 2009].
  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. California: Sage Publications.
  • Scott, W. R. (1987). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman, yJ. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 63-96). Jossey-Bas: San Francisco.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. New York: Sage Publications.
  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4), 936-960. (Pubitemid 126003239)
  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 2 (36), 111-147.
  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 517-610.
  • Suprapto B. Business strategy, environmental policy and organizational performance: A study of Indonesian chemical industry. En: Sharma S, Aragón JA, editors. GRONEN: 2004 Workshop. Research on Advanced Environmental Management: Opportunities and Capabilities. Granada; 2004.
  • Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, J., y Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modelling. Compu-tacional Statistics & Data Analysis, 48 (1), 159-205.
  • Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., y Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorga-nizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1), 19-49.
  • Tolbert, P. S., y Zucker, L G. (1983). Institutional source of change in the formal structure organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1), 22-39.
  • Tolbert, P. S., y Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175-190). London: Sage Publications.
  • Tornikoski, E. T., y Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (2), 311-335. (Pubitemid 44890907)
  • Torres, E. (2003). El turismo residencial y sus efectos en los destinos turísticos. Estudios Turísticos, 116, 115-120.
  • Tsai-Ju, L., y Chwo-Ming, J. (2012). Knowledge transfer, regulatory support, legitimacy, and financial performance: The case of foreign firms investing in China. Journal of World Business, 47, 114-122.
  • Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahov, T., y Whermeyer, W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 133-146.
  • Walley, N., y Whitehead, B. (1994). It's not easy being green. Harvard Deusto Business Review, 72 (3), 46-52.
  • Williams, H., Medhurst, J., y Drew, K. (1993). Corporate strategies for a sustainable future. In K. Fischer, y J. Schot (Eds.), Environmental strategies for industry: international perspectives on research needs and policy implications. Washington: Island Press.
  • Worrell, D., Gilley, M., Davidson, III, y El-Jely, A. (1995). When green turns to red: stock market reaction to announced greening activities. Vancouver: Academy of Management Meeting.
  • Xianbing, L., Beibei, L., Tomohiro, S., Qinqin, Y., Jun, B., y Tetsuro, F. (2010). An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental management in China. Journal of Environment Management, 91, 1707-1717.
  • Zsidisin, G. A., Melnyk, S. A., y Ragatz, G. L. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (16), 3401-3420. (Pubitemid 41648311)
  • Zucker, G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.