" The Right to Privacy ". La génesis de la protección de la privacidad en el sistema constitucional norteamericanaoel centenario legado de Warren y Brandeis

Referencias bibliográficas

• SHAPIRO, F. R. (1985). «The Most-Cited Law Review Articles», California Law Review, vol. 73
• SHAPIRO( 1995-1996). «The Most-Cited Law Review Articles Revisited», Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 71
• RATMAN, B. E. (2002). «Brandeisand Warren’s “The Right to Privacy” and The Birth of The Right to Privacy», Tennessee Law Review, vol. 69
• DREYFUSS, R.C. (1999). «Warren and Brandeis Redux: Finding(More) Privacy Protection in Intellectual Property Lore», Stanford Technology Law Review, Papernúm. 8
• KRAMER, I. R. (1990). «The Birth of Privacy Law: A Century Since Warrenand Brandeis», Catholic University Law Review, vol. 39
• BARRON, J. H. (1979).«Warren and Brandeis, The Right to Privacy», 4 Harvard Law Review, 193 (1890): Demystifyinga Landmark Citation», Suffolk University Law Review, vol. 13
• GLANCY, D. J.(1979). «The Invention of the Right to Privacy», Arizona Law Review, vol. 21, núm. 1
• WARREN, S. D. y BRANDEIS, L. D. (1995). El derecho a la intimidad, edición a cargo de Benigno Pendás y Pilar Baselga, Madrid, Civitas
• ARCEJANARIZ, A. (1996). Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, núm. 47
• GARCÍAROCA, J. (1996). Revista de las Cortes Generales, núm. 37
• CARRILLO SALCEDO,M. (2003). El derecho a no ser molestado, Thomson-Aranzadi, Pamplona
• MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, R. (2004). Una Aproximación crítica a la autodeterminación informativa, Madrid,Civitas
• GARRIGA DOMÍNGUEZ, A. (2004). Tratamiento de datos personales y derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Dykinson
• PÉREZ LUÑO, A. E. (2005). Derechos Humanos, Estado de Derecho y Constitución, Madrid, Tecnos
• LUCAS MURILLO DE LA CUEVA, P.(1990). El derecho a la autodeterminación informativa. La protección de los datos personales ante el uso de la informática, Madrid, Tecnos
• HERRÁN ORTIZ, A. I. (2004). El derecho a la intimidad en la nueva ley orgánica de protección de datos personales, Madrid, Dykinson
• CABEZUELO ARENAS, A. L. (1998). Derecho a la intimidad, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch
• MARTÍNEZ SOSPEDRA, M. (1996). «Sobre la intimidad. Derecho a la intimidad, vida privada y privacy. El artículo 18.1 CE in principio en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional», en VALLESCOPEIRO DELVILLAR, A. y AZNARGÓMEZ, H. (coords.), Sobre la Intimidad, Valencia, Fundación Universitaria San Pablo C.E.U.
• RUIZ MIGUEL, C. (1995). La configuración constitucional del derecho a la intimidad, Madrid, Tecnos
• SOLOVE, D. J. (2002). «Conceptualizing Privacy», California Law Review, vol. 90
• POST, R. C. (2001). «Three Concepts of Privacy», Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 89
• RUBENFELD,J. (1989).«The Right of Privacy»,Harvard Law Review, vol. 102
• GERETY, T.(1977).«Redefining Privacy», Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 12
• GAVISON, R. (1980). «Privacy and the Limits of Law», Yale Law Journal,vol. 89,
• O’BRIEN, D. M. (1979). Privacy, Law, and Public Policy, New York, Praeger,
• BRECKENRIDGE, A. C. (1970). The Right to Privacy, Lincoln, Universityof Nebraska Press
• GROSS, H. (1967). «The Concept of Privacy», NewYork University Law Review, vol. 42
• ETZIONI, A. (1999). The Limits of Privacy, New York, Basic Books
• DECEW, J. W. (1997). In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and Rise ofTechnology, Ithaca, Cornell University Press
• POSNER, R. A. (1981). The Economics of Justice, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press
• REIMAN, J. H. (1984). «Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood», en Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Antohology, SCHOEMAN, F. D. (ed.), Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press
• HENKIN, L. (1974). «Privacy and Autonomy», Columbia Law Review,vol. 74
• CRAVEN, B. (1976).«Personhood:The Right to Be Let Alone», Duke Law Journal, vol. 15
• FRIED, C. (1968). «Privacy (A Moral Analysis)», Yale Law Journal, vol. 77,
• BLOUSTEIN, E. (1964). «Privacy-Asan Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser», New York University Law Review, vol.39
• WESTIN, A. F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom, New York, Atheneum,
• MILLER (1969). «Personal Privacy inthe Computer Age: The Challenge of a New Technology and Information Oriented Society», Michigan Law Review, vol. 67
• SALDAÑA, M. N. (2011). «El derecho a la privacidad en los Estados Unidos: Aproximación diacrónica a los intereses constitucionales en juego», Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, núm. 28
• GOLDMAN, L. (2006). «The Constitutional Right to Privacy», Denver University Law Review, vol. 84
• WHITMAN, J. Q. (2004). «The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty», Yale Law Journal, vol. 113
• LAHERTY, D. H. (1972). Privacy in Colonial New England, Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia
• O‘CONNOR, Th. H. (1968). «The Right to Privacy in Historical Perspective»,Massachusetts Law Review, vol. 53
• PITT, W. «Speech on the Excise Bill», en HANSARD, T. C. (ed.) (1753-1765). The Parliamentary History of England from the Earliest Period to the Year 1803, 23 vols., London, vol. 15, 1806-1820,
• «An Englishman’s dwelling House is his Castle. The law has erected a Fortification round it», en WROTH, L. K. y ZOBEL, H. B. (eds.) (1965). Legal Papers of John Adams, 3 vols., Cambridge, Mass.,Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, vol. I,
• CUDDIHY, W. J. (2009). The Fourth Amendment: Origins and Original Meaning, 602-1791, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press
• CLANCY, Th. K. (2008). The Fourth Amendment: Its History and Interpretation, Durham, Carolina Academic Press
• AMAR, A. R. (1994). «Fourth Amendment First Principles», Harvard Law Review,vol. 107
• DAVIES, Th. Y. (1999). «Recovering the Original Fourth Amendment»,Michigan Law Review, vol. 98
• TAYLOR, T. (1969). Tow Studies in Constitutional Interpretation: Search, Seizure, and Surveillance and Fair and Free Press, Columbus, Ohio State University Press
• LANDYNSKI, J. B. (1966). Search and Seizure and the Supreme Court: Study in Constitutional Interpretation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press
• LASSON, N. B. (1937). The History and Development of the Fourth Amendment to the United States, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1937
• STEPHEN, J. F. (1873). Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Warner, S. D. (ed.), Indianapolis, LibertyFund
• COOLEY, Th. M. (1879). A Treatise on the Law of Torts or the Wrongs Which Arise Independently of Contract, Chicago, Callaghan
• MENSEL, R. E. (1991). «“Kodakers Lying in Wait”: Amateur Photography and the Right of Privacy in New York, 1885-1915», American Quarterly, vol. 43
• BASCOM, J. (1884). «Public Press and Personal Rights», Education, vol. 4,
• TURKINGTON, R. C. y ALLEN, A. L. (1999). Privacy Law: Cases and Materials, St. Paul, Minn., West Group
• WARREN, S. D. y BRANDEIS, L. D. (1889). «The Law of The Ponds», Harvard Law Review, vol. 3
• WARREN, S. D. y BRANDEIS, L. D. (1888) «The Watuppa Pond Cases», Harvard Law Review,vol. 2
• STRUM, P. (1984). Louis D. Brandeis: Justice for the People,Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press,
• Thomas L. Cooley,(1880). The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America, Boston, Little, Brown
• GORMLEY, K. (1992). «One Hundred Years of Privacy», Wisconsin Law Review, págs. 1335-1441,
• SUTHERLAND, A. E. (1967). The Law at Harvard: A History of Ideas and Men, 1817-1967, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
• PAPER, L. J.(1983). Brandeis, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall, 1983
• MELVIN, M. I. (2009). Louis D. Brandeis: A Life, New York, Pantheon Books
• PURCELL, E. A. (2000). Brandeis and the Progressive Constitution, New Haven, Yale University Press
• DAWSON, N. L. (ed.). (1989). Brandeis and America, Lexington, University of Kentucky Press
• MASON, A. T. (1946). Brandeis, a Free Man’s Life, New York, The Viking Press
• LIEF, A. (1936). Brandeis: The Personal History of an American Ideal, New York, Stackpole Sons.
• KONEFSKY, S. J. (1956). The Legacy of Holmes and Brandeis,The Macmillan Company.
• PROSSER, W. (1960). «Privacy», California Law Review, vol. 48
• GREENE, J. (2006). «Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy and Punishment», Yale Law Journal, vol. 115
• ROSEN, J. (2001). The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America, New York, Vintage Books
• PEMBER, D. R.(1972). Privacy and the Press: The Law, The Mass Media, and the First Amendment, Seattle, University of Washington Press
• GAJDA, A. (2008). «What if Samuel D. Warren Hadn’t Marrieda Senator’s Daughter?: Uncovering the Press Coverage that Led to «The Right to Privacy», Michigan State Law Review
• UROFSKY, M. I. y LEVY, D. W. (eds.) (1971-1978). The Letters of Louis D. Brandeis, 5 vols., Albany, State University of New York Press, vol. I
• E. L. ADAMS (1905).«The Right of Privacy, and Its Relation to the Law of Libel», American Law Review, vol. 39
• E. L. ADAMS (1902). «The Law of Privacy», The North American Review, vol. 175
• LARREMORE,W. (1912). «The Law of Privacy», Columbia Law Review, vol. 12
• GODKIN, T. (1891). «The Right to Privacy», Nation, núm. 51
• FRANKLIN, M. (1964).«The Origins and Constitutionality of Limitations on Truth as a Defense in Tort Law», Stanford Law Review, vol. 16
• ROSENBERG, N. L. (1975). «The New Law of Political Libel:A Historical Perspective», Rutgers Law Review, vol. 28
• MILL, J. S. (1990). Sobre la Libertad, traducción de P. de Azcárate, prólogo de Isaiah Berlin, Madrid, Alianza Editorial
• MATLACK, S. D. (1895).«Corliss v. E.W. Walker Co. United States Circuit Court, District of Massachusetts», American Law Register and Review, vol. 43
• SPEED, J. G. (1896). «The Right of Privacy», North American Review, vol. 158
• O’BRIEN, D.(1902). «The Right of Privacy», Columbia Law Review, vol. 2, CLANCY, Th. K. (1998). «What Does the Fourth Amendment Protect: Property,Privacy, or Security?», Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 33
• CLOUD, M. (1996). «The Fourth Amendment During the Lochner Era: Privacy, Property andLiberty in Constitutional Theory», Stanford Law Review, vol. 48
• BARRET, E. L.(1960). «Personal Rights, Property Rights, and the Fourth Amendment», Supreme Court Review
• AGRE, Ph. E. y ROTENBERG, M. (eds.), Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, Cambridge, The MIT Press
• DIFFIE, W. y LANDAU, S. (1998). Privacy on the Line: The Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption, Cambridge,Mass., MIT Press
• MILLER, A. R.(1971). The Assault on Privacy: Computers, Data Banks and Dossiers, University of Michigan Press,Ann Arbor
• MITCHELL, J. B. (1992).«What Went Wrong with the Warren Court’s Conception of the Fourth Amendment?», New England Law Review, vol 27
• NOONAN, J. (1984). «The Root and Branch of Roe v. Wade», Nebraska Law Review, vol. 63
• REGAN, D. (1979). «Rewriting Roe v. Wade», Michigan Law Review, vol. 77
• ELY, J. (1973). «The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade», Yale Law Journal, vol.82
• HEYMANN, P. y BARZELAY, D. (1973). «The Forest and the Trees: Roe v. Wadeand Its Critics», Boston University Law Review, vol. 53
• EPSTEIN, R. (1973).«Substantive Due Process by Any Other Name: The Abortion Cases», Supreme Court Review
• SCHWARTZ, P. M. (2000). «Internet, Privacy and the State», Connecticut Law Review, vol. 32
• SCHWARTZ (1999). «Privacy and Democracy inCyberspace», Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 52
• KANG, J. (1998). «Information Privacy in Cyberspace Transactions», Stanford Law Review, vol. 50
• CATE, F. H.(1997). Privacy in the Information Age, Washington, Brookings Institution Press
• FLAHERTY, D.H. (1991). «On the Utility of Constitutional Rights to Privacy and Data Protection», Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol. 41
• CHLAPOWSKI, F. S. (1991). «The Constitutional Protection of Informational Privacy», Boston University Law Review, vol. 71
• TURKINGTON, R. C. (1989-1990). «Legacy of the Warren and Brandeis Article: The Emerging Unencumbered Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy», Northern Illinois University Law Review,vol. 10
• O’BRIEN, C. M. (2010). «Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12, Background Investigations, and Informational Privacy Rights», Mississippi Law Journal, vol.80
• GORKIN, R. T. (2010). «The Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy:Nasa v. Nelson», Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar, vol. 6
• BEZANSON, R. P. (1992). «The Right to Privacy Revisited:Privacy, News and Social Change, 1890-1990», California Law Review, vol. 80
• FROOMKIN, M. A. (2000). «The Death of Privacy?», Stanford Law Review, vol. 52
• KALVEN, H. (1966). «Privacy in Tort Law—Were Warren and Bran-deis Wrong?», Law & Contemporary Problems, vol. 31
• BLOUSTEIN, E. (1968). «Privacy, Tort Law and the Constitution: Is Warren and Brandeis’ Tort Petty and Unconstitutional as Well?», Texas Law Review, vol. 46
• POST, R. C. (1991). «Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, Property, and Appropriation», Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol. 41
• POST (1989). «The Social Foundations of Privacy: Community and Self in the Common Law Tort», California Law Review, vol. 77
• SCHAWRTZ, M.(1995). «Privacy and Participation: Personal Information and Public Sector Regulation in the United States», Iowa Law Review, vol. 80
• BAZELON, D.L. (1977). «Probing Privacy», Gonzaga Law Review, vol. 12
• REIDENBERG, J. R (2000). «Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace», Stanford Law Review, vol. 52, núm. 5