¿Cuántas veces dejamos de ser niños? Un análisis de la representación social de la autonomía infantil

  1. Rodríguez Pascual, Iván
  2. Morales Marente, Elena María
Journal:
REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

ISSN: 0210-5233

Year of publication: 2013

Issue: 143

Pages: 75-92

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5477/CIS/REIS.143.75 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

Abstract

The definition of the age range for childhood varies from one society to another, and has often been used as evidence that childhood is a social construction. The aim of this study is to analyse the collective representation of these age limits and their relationship with the concept of autonomy as constructed by public opinion in Spain. The latest available data about attitudes towards childhood from the Spanish Sociological Research Centre (CIS) were used, as well as CIS study 2621 on opinions, and attitudes to Childhood. Factorial analysis revealed a series of components that we have called «autonomy factors». The main conclusion is that public opinion understands childhood from an adultcentric perspective as a complex sequence that includes different temporal boundaries, ranging from an early age, where autonomy appears as an expression of a private world under family authority; to others closer to the age of majority, which include participation in the institutional sphere and behaviour associated with youth leisure time.

Bibliographic References

  • Aguinaga, Josune and Domingo Comas Arnau (1991). Infancia y adolescencia: la mirada de los adultos. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.
  • Casas, Ferran (1998). Infancia: perspectivas psicosociales. Barcelona: Paidos.
  • Casas, Ferran (2006). "Infancia y representaciones sociales". Política y Sociedad, 43(1): 27-42.
  • Casas, Ferran (2010). "Representaciones sociales que influyen en las políticas sociales de infancia y adolescencia en Europa". Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 17: 15-28.
  • Gaitan, Lourdes (2006). Sociología de la Infancia. Madrid: Sistema.
  • Herrera Gómez, Manuel and Pedro Caston Boyer (2003). Las políticas sociales en las sociedades complejas. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Honig, Michael (2009). "How is the Child Constituted in Childhood Studies?". In: J. Qvortrup et al. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. New York: Palgrave-macmillan.
  • James, Allison and Allan Prout (1997). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood : Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.
  • James, Allison; Chris Jenks and Allan Prout (1998). Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge (Mass.): Polity Press.
  • Martínez, Marta and Andrés Ligero Lasa (2003). "Familia, infancia y derechos: Una mirada cualitativa desde la percepción adulta". Portularia, 3: 49-65.
  • Meyer, Anneke (2007). "The Moral Rhetoric of Childhood". Childhood, 14(1): 85-105.
  • Qvortrup Jens (1993). "Nine theses about Childhood as a Social Phenomenom". In: J. Qvortrup (ed), Childhood as a social Phenomenom : Lessons from an Internacional Project. Wien: The European Center for Social Welfare Policy and Research.
  • Rodriguez-Pascual, Ivan (2006). Para una sociología de la infancia: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos. Madrid: CIS.
  • Rodríguez-Pascual, Ivan (2010). ".La muerte de la infancia es el fracaso de lo adulto?". Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 407: 40-43.
  • Stainton-Rogers, Wendy (2003). "What is a Child?". In: M. Woodhead and H. Montgomery (eds.), Understanding Childhood: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Thorne, Barrie (2004). "Theorizing age and other differences". Childhood, 11(4): 403-408.