Corrupción y rendición de cuentas

  1. Mora Molina, Juan Jesús
Revue:
Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

ISSN: 1133-0937

Année de publication: 2014

Año: 18

Número: 30

Pages: 145-172

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

Résumé

Democracy, sooner or later, has to face corruption. Its survival will depend on both the decisions made by governments and the effectiveness of the steps taken to held incumbents and officials accountable. In truth, we cannot offer universally valid explanations to throw light on abuse of power or on appropriation of public goods for private benefit, because corruption is shown up in several ways. It is in doubt that the efforts of designing an ideal-type could help a lot, because the amount of cleavages on which different democracies� institutions are built discloses characteristics unique to them and makes criteria of malfeasance shifted from one polity to another. Consequently, that plurality of views encourages Philosophy of Law and Political Philosophy approaches as suitable and essential ones.

Références bibliographiques

  • “A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support”, British Journal of Political Science, núm. 5, 1975, pp. 435-457,
  • A. ARGANDOÑA et al., “Code of Ethics for Politicians”, Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, núm. 3, 2012, pp. 9-16.
  • A. F. ROBERTSON, “Misunderstanding Corruption”, Anthropology Today, núm. 22, vol. 2, 2006, p. 11:
  • A. JAIN, “Corruption: A Review”, Journal of Economics Surveys, núm. 15, vol. 1, 2001, pp. 73-74
  • A. MUNGIU, “Corruption: Diagnosis and Treatment”, Journal of Democracy, núm. 17, vol. 3, 2006, p. 92.
  • B. ROTHSTEIN & E. M. USLANER, “Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust”, World Politics, núm. 58, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 41-72.
  • Country Risk Review (http://www.standardandpoors.com).
  • D. EPPS, “Mechanism of Secrecy”, Harvard Law Review, núm. 121, vol. 6, 2008, pp. 1556-1577.
  • D. LEDERMAN, N. LOAYZA & R. R. SOARES, “Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series núm. 2708, 2004, p. 4.
  • D. P. REDLAWSK & J. A. MCCANN, “Popular Interpretation of ‘Corruption’ and their Partisan Consequences”, Political Behavior, núm. 27, vol. 3, 2005
  • E. L. MCKRITICK, “The Study of Corruption”, Political Science Quaterly, núm. 72, vol. 4, 1957, p. 502.
  • E. WLADIMIR, “Corruption and Bribery”, The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, núm. 42, vol. 3, 1951.
  • G. DE GRAFF, “Causes of Corruption: Towards a Contextual Theory of Corruption”, Public Administration Quarterly, núm. 31, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 43 ss.
  • G. HODGSON & SH. JIANG, “La economía de la corrupción y la corrupción de la economía: una perspectiva institucionalista”, Revista de Economía Institucional, núm. 10, vol. 18, 2008, p. 61:
  • G. SIMMEL en Die Philosophie des Geldes, Münich-Leipzig, Duncker & Humboldt, 1920,
  • GALLUP International (http://www.gallup.com),
  • Global Corruption Barometer, Bribe Payers Index, Global Corruption Report, National Integrity System assessments y Transparency In Corporate Reporting (http://cpi. transparency.org/cpi2012/in_detail/#myAnchor8).
  • J. GERRING & S. C. THACKER, “Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism”, British Journal of Political Science, núm. 34, vol. 2, 2004, p. 295.
  • J. MADISON, “The Structure of Government Must Furnish and Proper Checks and Balances between the Different Departments”, The Federalist nº 51, Independent Journal, Wednesday, February 6, 1788 (http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa51.htm).
  • J. P. EUBEN, “Corruption”, en T. BALL, J. FARR & R. L. HANSEN (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge university Press, 1989, pp. 220-246.
  • J. SVENSSON, “Eight Questions about Corruption”, Journal of Economics Perspectives, núm. 19, vol. 3, 2005, pp. 20-21.
  • L. STIRTON & M. LODGE, “Transparency Mechanisms: Building Publicness into Public Services”, Journal of Law and Society, núm. 28, vol. 4, 2001, pp. 471-489.
  • M. E. WARREN, “Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption”, American Journal of Political Science, núm. 50, vol. 1, 2006, pp. 160-174.
  • M. E. WARREN, “Political Corruption as Duplicitous Exclusion”, Political Science and Politics, núm. 39, vol. 4, 2006, p. 803.
  • M. E. WARREN, “What Does Corruption Mean in Democracy?”, American Journal of Political Science, núm. 48, vol. 2, 2004, p. 329.
  • M. TAVITS, “Clarity of Responsibility and Corruption”, American Journal of Political Science, núm. 51, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 218-229.
  • M. VILLORIA & F. JIMÉNEZ, “¿Cuánta corrupción hay en España? Los problemas metodológicos de la medición de la corrupción”, Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 156, 2012,
  • P.G.W. GLARE, Oxford Latin Dictionary, Clarendon Press, 1954, p. 451.
  • The Global Competitiveness Survey (http://www.weforum.org/issues/globalcompetitiveness)
  • Thesaurus linguae latinae, Vol. IV, MDCCCCVI-MDCCCCIX, pp. 1049-1605
  • WOOD, “Corruption in Contemporary Spain”, Political Science and Politics, núm. 40, vol. 4, 2007, p. 41.
La source de données: Dialnet