Teorías del valorcoincidencias y divergencias en la economía y la antropología social

  1. García del Hoyo, Juan José
  2. Jiménez de Madariaga, Celeste
Revista:
Revista de economía institucional

ISSN: 2346-2450,  0124-5996

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 17

Número: 33

Páginas: 109-131

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18601/01245996.V17N33.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de economía institucional

Resumen

Este artículo revisa la concepción del valor en economía y antropología. Muestra que entre estas disciplinas ha habido un distanciamiento debido a diferencias metodológicas y al tema de estudio, sobre todo cuando los hechos económicos se estudian desde el punto de vista puramente individual y se omite el marco cultural e institucional. En los últimos años ha habido una reconciliación a través del pensamiento institucionalista, que se nutre de otras ciencias sociales, da mayor realismo a los modelos económicos y hace posible interpretar mejor la complejidad del mundo económico.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Appadurai, A. The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  • Ayres, C. E. The theory of economic progress, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
  • Bardhan, P., ed. Conversations between economists and anthropologists:Methodological issues in measuring economic change in rural India, Nueva Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • Bardhan, P. e I. Ray. “Methodological approaches in economics and anthropology”, J. Davis y W. Dofsma, eds., The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, Cheltenham, Elgar Publishing, 2008, pp. 427-456.
  • Blaug, M. The methodology of economics [1980], Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. Capital and interest, 3 vols. [1921], South Holland, Libertarian Press, 1959.
  • Booyens, J. “Economics and Anthropology: in search of partnerships”,South African Journal of Economics, 66, 4, 1998, pp. 585-596.
  • Bourdieu, P. La distinction. Critique social du jugement, París, Editions de Minuit, 1979.
  • Buckley, P. J. y M. Chapman. “Economics and social anthropology – Reconciling difference”, Human Relations 49, 9, 1996, pp. 1123-1150.
  • Cantillon, R. Ensayo sobre la naturaleza del comercio en general [1755],México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1950.
  • Castaingts, J. Simbolismos del dinero. Antropología y economía: una encrucijada, Barcelona-Iztapalapa, Anthropos, 2002.
  • Cohen, P. S. “Análisis económico y hombre económico. Comentarios sobre una controversia”, R. Firth, ed., Temas de antropología económica,México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974, pp. 95-121.
  • Dalton, G. “Economic theory and primitive society”, American Anthropologist 63, 1, 1961, pp. 1-25.
  • Dalton, G. “Is economics anthropology of interest to economists?”, American Economics Review 68, 2, 1978, pp. 23-27.
  • Devons, E. y M. Gluckman. “Conclusion: Modes and consequences of limiting a field of study”, M. Gluckman, ed., Closed systems and open minds: The limits of naivety in social anthropology, Edimburgo, Oliver & Boyd, 1964, pp. 158-261.
  • Díaz de R., A. “Valer y valor. Una exhumación de la teoría del valor para reflexionar sobre la desigualdad y la diferencia en relación con la escuela”, Revista de Antropología Social 16, 2007, pp. 117-158.
  • Dobb, M. Political economy and capitalism: Some essays in economic tradition, Londres, Routledge, 1937.
  • Douglas, M. “The exclusion of economics”, Times Literary Suppl., 6 de julio de 1973, pp. 781-782.
  • Dumont, L. “On value”, Proceedings of the British Academy 66, 1982,pp. 207-241.
  • Edgeworth, F. Y. Mathematical psychics. An essay on the application of mathematics to moral sciences, Londres, Kegan Paul & Co., 1881.
  • Ensminger, J. “Experimental economics: A powerful new method for theory testing in anthropology”, J. Ensminger, ed., Theory in economic anthropology, Walnut Creek, Altamira Press, 2002, pp. 59-78.
  • Etzioni, A. The moral dimension. Toward a new economics, Nueva York,The Free Press, 1988.
  • Firth, R. Primitive economics of the New Zealand Maoris, Londres, Routledge, 1929
  • Foster, R. J. “The uses of use value: Marketing, value creation, and the exigencies of consumption work”, D. Zwick y J. Cayla, eds., Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices, Oxford, Oxford Scholarship, 2011, pp. 42-57.
  • Garnett, R. F. “Postmodernism and theories of value: New grounds for Institutionalist/Marxist dialogue?”, Journal of Economic Issues 33, 4, 1999, pp. 817-834.
  • Genovesi, A. Lecciones de comercio o bien de economía civil [1769], t.III, Madrid, Viuda de Ibarra, 1786.
  • Girard, R. La violence et le sacré, París, Grasset, Pluriel, 1972.
  • Godelier, M. Instituciones económicas, Barcelona, Anagrama, 1981.
  • Graeber, D. Toward an anthropological theory of value, Nueva York, Palgrave, 2001.
  • Graeber, D. “Value: Anthropological theories of value”, J. G. Carrier, ed., A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, Northampton, Elgar Publishing,2006, pp. 439-454.
  • Gregory, C. A. Savage money: The anthropology and politics of commodity exchange, Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • Haddad, L.; J. Hoddinott y H. Alderman. Intra-household resource allocation in developing countries. Models, methods, and policy, Baltimore,Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  • Hamilton, D. “The great wheel of wealth. A reflection of social reciprocity”, Journal of Economics and Sociology 24, julio de 1965, pp. 241-248.
  • Hamilton, D. “The meaning of anthropology for economic science: A case for intellectual reciprocity”, Journal of Economic Issues 25, 4, 1991, pp. 937-949.
  • Harriss, J. “The case for cross-disciplinary approaches in international development”, World Development 30, 3, 2002, pp. 487-496.
  • Henrich, J. et al. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies, Nueva York,Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Herskovits, M. J. Economic anthropology. A study in comparative economics,Nueva York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1952.
  • Hicks, J. R. Value and capital. An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1939.
  • Hicks, J. R. y R. G. Allen. “A reconsideration of the theory of value, Part I”, Economica 1, 1, 1934, pp. 52-76.
  • Jevons, W. S. The theory of political economy, Londres, McMillan, 1871.
  • Keynes, J. M. Teoría general del empleo, el interés y el dinero [1936],Madrid, Ediciones Aosta, 1998.
  • Kluckhohn, C. “Values and value-orientations in the theory of action.An exploration in definition and classification”, T. Parsons y E. Shils, eds., Toward a general theory of action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1951, pp. 388-433.
  • Knight, F. H. “Anthropology and economics”, Journal of Political Economy 49, 1941, pp. 247-268.
  • Kurz, H. D. y N. Mondadori, “Sraffa and the labour theory of value: A few observations”, J. Vint, J. S. Metcalfe et al., eds., Economic theory and economic thought: Essays in honour of Ian Steedman, Abigdon,Routledge, 2010, pp. 189-215.
  • Lancaster, K. J. “A new approach to consumer theory”, Journal of Political Economy LXXIV, 2, 1966, pp. 132-157.
  • Lipton, M. “Economics and anthropology: Grounding models in relationships”, World Development 20, 10, 1992, pp. 1541-1546.
  • Locke, J. Segundo tratado sobre el gobierno civil [1689], Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 2000.
  • Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific, Londres, Routledge,1922.
  • Malthus, T. R. Principios de economía política [1820], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1946.
  • Marshall, A. Principles of economics, Londres, Macmillan, 1890.
  • Marx, K. El capital [1867], vol. I, Barcelona, Orbis, 1988.
  • Menger, C. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Viena, Wilhelm Braumüller, 1871.
  • Mill, J. S. “On the definition of political economy and the method of investigation proper to it”, J. M. Robson, ed., Collected works of John Stuart Mill [1836], vol. 4, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1987.
  • Mill, J. S. Principios de economía política [1848], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1951.
  • Mises, L. von. La acción humana. Tratado de economía [1949], Madrid,Unión editorial, 1980.
  • Mishan, E. J. “Theories of consumer’s behaviour: A cynical view”, Economica 28, 109, 1961, pp. 1-11.
  • Morris, C. Varieties of human value, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
  • North, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Pareto, W. Manual de economía política [1906], Madrid, Atalaya, 1945.
  • Pearson, H. “Homo economicus goes native, 1859-1945: The rise and fall of primitive economics”, History of Political Economy 32, 4, 2000,pp. 933-989.
  • Pearson, H. “Primitive economics: A reply”, History of Political Economy 34, 1, 2002, pp. 273-281.
  • Perry C. M. “Value as any object of any interest”, International Journal of Ethics 40, 4, 1930, pp. 490-495.
  • Perry, R. B. General theory of value. Its meaning and basic principles construed in terms of interest [1926], Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1950.
  • Pieters, R. y H. Baumgartner. “Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journal”, Journals of Economics Literature 40, 2, 2002, pp. 483-509.
  • Pryor, F. L. The origins of the economy: A comparative study of distribution in primitive and peasant economies, Nueva York, Academic Press, 1977.
  • Rao, V. y M. Walton. Culture and public action, Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 2004.
  • Ricardo, D. Principios de economía política y tributación [1821], México,D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2004.
  • Samuelson, P. A. “A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour”,Economica 5 17, 1938, pp. 61-71.
  • Say, J. B. Tratado de economía política [1803], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2000.
  • Sen, A. “Sraffa, Wittgenstein, and Gramsci”, Journal of Economic Literature 41, 4, 2003, pp. 1240-1255.
  • Smith, A. Investigación de la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones [1776], Valladolid, Oficina Viuda e hijos de Santander, 1794.
  • Thomas, N. Entangled objects: Exchange material culture, and colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1991.
  • Tool, M. R. “A social value theory in neoinstitutional economics”, Journal of Economic Issues 11, 4, 1977, pp. 823-844.
  • Veblen, T. “The limitations of marginal utility”, Journal of Political Economy 17, 9, 1909, pp. 620-636.
  • Veblen, T. The theory of leisure class: An economic study of institutions [1899], Macmillan, Nueva York, 1915.
  • Verri, P. Tratado elemental de la economía política [1771], Madrid, Imprenta de Espinosa, 1820.
  • Walras, L. Elements of pure economics or the theory of social wealth [1874], Fairfield, Augustus Kelley Publishers, 1977.
  • White, H. “Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in poverty analysis”, World Development 30, 3, 2002, pp. 511-522.
  • Bardhan, P., ed. Conversations between economists and anthropologists:Methodological issues in measuring economic change in rural India, Nueva Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • Bardhan, P. e I. Ray. “Methodological approaches in economics and anthropology”, J. Davis y W. Dofsma, eds., The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, Cheltenham, Elgar Publishing, 2008, pp. 427-456.
  • Blaug, M. The methodology of economics [1980], Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. Capital and interest, 3 vols. [1921], South Holland, Libertarian Press, 1959.
  • Booyens, J. “Economics and Anthropology: in search of partnerships”,South African Journal of Economics, 66, 4, 1998, pp. 585-596.
  • Bourdieu, P. La distinction. Critique social du jugement, París, Editions de Minuit, 1979.
  • Buckley, P. J. y M. Chapman. “Economics and social anthropology – Reconciling difference”, Human Relations 49, 9, 1996, pp. 1123-1150.
  • Cantillon, R. Ensayo sobre la naturaleza del comercio en general [1755],México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1950.
  • Castaingts, J. Simbolismos del dinero. Antropología y economía: una encrucijada, Barcelona-Iztapalapa, Anthropos, 2002.
  • Cohen, P. S. “Análisis económico y hombre económico. Comentarios sobre una controversia”, R. Firth, ed., Temas de antropología económica,México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974, pp. 95-121.
  • Dalton, G. “Economic theory and primitive society”, American Anthropologist 63, 1, 1961, pp. 1-25.
  • Dalton, G. “Is economics anthropology of interest to economists?”, American Economics Review 68, 2, 1978, pp. 23-27.
  • Devons, E. y M. Gluckman. “Conclusion: Modes and consequences of limiting a field of study”, M. Gluckman, ed., Closed systems and open minds: The limits of naivety in social anthropology, Edimburgo, Oliver & Boyd, 1964, pp. 158-261.
  • Díaz de R., A. “Valer y valor. Una exhumación de la teoría del valor para reflexionar sobre la desigualdad y la diferencia en relación con la escuela”, Revista de Antropología Social 16, 2007, pp. 117-158.
  • Dobb, M. Political economy and capitalism: Some essays in economic tradition, Londres, Routledge, 1937.
  • Douglas, M. “The exclusion of economics”, Times Literary Suppl., 6 de julio de 1973, pp. 781-782.
  • Dumont, L. “On value”, Proceedings of the British Academy 66, 1982,pp. 207-241.
  • Edgeworth, F. Y. Mathematical psychics. An essay on the application of mathematics to moral sciences, Londres, Kegan Paul & Co., 1881.
  • Ensminger, J. “Experimental economics: A powerful new method for theory testing in anthropology”, J. Ensminger, ed., Theory in economic anthropology, Walnut Creek, Altamira Press, 2002, pp. 59-78.
  • Etzioni, A. The moral dimension. Toward a new economics, Nueva York,The Free Press, 1988.
  • Firth, R. Primitive economics of the New Zealand Maoris, Londres, Routledge, 1929
  • Foster, R. J. “The uses of use value: Marketing, value creation, and the exigencies of consumption work”, D. Zwick y J. Cayla, eds., Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices, Oxford, Oxford Scholarship, 2011, pp. 42-57.
  • Garnett, R. F. “Postmodernism and theories of value: New grounds for Institutionalist/Marxist dialogue?”, Journal of Economic Issues 33, 4, 1999, pp. 817-834.
  • Genovesi, A. Lecciones de comercio o bien de economía civil [1769], t.III, Madrid, Viuda de Ibarra, 1786.
  • Girard, R. La violence et le sacré, París, Grasset, Pluriel, 1972.
  • Godelier, M. Instituciones económicas, Barcelona, Anagrama, 1981.
  • Graeber, D. Toward an anthropological theory of value, Nueva York, Palgrave, 2001.
  • Graeber, D. “Value: Anthropological theories of value”, J. G. Carrier, ed., A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, Northampton, Elgar Publishing,2006, pp. 439-454.
  • Gregory, C. A. Savage money: The anthropology and politics of commodity exchange, Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • Haddad, L.; J. Hoddinott y H. Alderman. Intra-household resource allocation in developing countries. Models, methods, and policy, Baltimore,Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  • Hamilton, D. “The great wheel of wealth. A reflection of social reciprocity”, Journal of Economics and Sociology 24, julio de 1965, pp. 241-248.
  • Hamilton, D. “The meaning of anthropology for economic science: A case for intellectual reciprocity”, Journal of Economic Issues 25, 4, 1991, pp. 937-949.
  • Harriss, J. “The case for cross-disciplinary approaches in international development”, World Development 30, 3, 2002, pp. 487-496.
  • Henrich, J. et al. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies, Nueva York,Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Herskovits, M. J. Economic anthropology. A study in comparative economics,Nueva York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1952.
  • Hicks, J. R. Value and capital. An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1939.
  • Hicks, J. R. y R. G. Allen. “A reconsideration of the theory of value, Part I”, Economica 1, 1, 1934, pp. 52-76.
  • Jevons, W. S. The theory of political economy, Londres, McMillan, 1871.
  • Keynes, J. M. Teoría general del empleo, el interés y el dinero [1936],Madrid, Ediciones Aosta, 1998.
  • Kluckhohn, C. “Values and value-orientations in the theory of action.An exploration in definition and classification”, T. Parsons y E. Shils, eds., Toward a general theory of action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1951, pp. 388-433.
  • Knight, F. H. “Anthropology and economics”, Journal of Political Economy 49, 1941, pp. 247-268.
  • Kurz, H. D. y N. Mondadori, “Sraffa and the labour theory of value: A few observations”, J. Vint, J. S. Metcalfe et al., eds., Economic theory and economic thought: Essays in honour of Ian Steedman, Abigdon,Routledge, 2010, pp. 189-215.
  • Lancaster, K. J. “A new approach to consumer theory”, Journal of Political Economy LXXIV, 2, 1966, pp. 132-157.
  • Lipton, M. “Economics and anthropology: Grounding models in relationships”, World Development 20, 10, 1992, pp. 1541-1546.
  • Locke, J. Segundo tratado sobre el gobierno civil [1689], Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 2000.
  • Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific, Londres, Routledge,1922.
  • Malthus, T. R. Principios de economía política [1820], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1946.
  • Marshall, A. Principles of economics, Londres, Macmillan, 1890.
  • Marx, K. El capital [1867], vol. I, Barcelona, Orbis, 1988.
  • Menger, C. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Viena, Wilhelm Braumüller, 1871.
  • Mill, J. S. “On the definition of political economy and the method of investigation proper to it”, J. M. Robson, ed., Collected works of John Stuart Mill [1836], vol. 4, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1987.
  • Mill, J. S. Principios de economía política [1848], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1951.
  • Mises, L. von. La acción humana. Tratado de economía [1949], Madrid,Unión editorial, 1980.
  • Mishan, E. J. “Theories of consumer’s behaviour: A cynical view”, Economica 28, 109, 1961, pp. 1-11.
  • Morris, C. Varieties of human value, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
  • North, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Pareto, W. Manual de economía política [1906], Madrid, Atalaya, 1945.
  • Pearson, H. “Homo economicus goes native, 1859-1945: The rise and fall of primitive economics”, History of Political Economy 32, 4, 2000,pp. 933-989.
  • Pearson, H. “Primitive economics: A reply”, History of Political Economy 34, 1, 2002, pp. 273-281.
  • Perry C. M. “Value as any object of any interest”, International Journal of Ethics 40, 4, 1930, pp. 490-495.
  • Perry, R. B. General theory of value. Its meaning and basic principles construed in terms of interest [1926], Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1950.
  • Pieters, R. y H. Baumgartner. “Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journal”, Journals of Economics Literature 40, 2, 2002, pp. 483-509.
  • Pryor, F. L. The origins of the economy: A comparative study of distribution in primitive and peasant economies, Nueva York, Academic Press, 1977.
  • Rao, V. y M. Walton. Culture and public action, Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 2004.
  • Ricardo, D. Principios de economía política y tributación [1821], México,D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2004.
  • Samuelson, P. A. “A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour”,Economica 5 17, 1938, pp. 61-71.
  • Say, J. B. Tratado de economía política [1803], México, D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2000.
  • Sen, A. “Sraffa, Wittgenstein, and Gramsci”, Journal of Economic Literature 41, 4, 2003, pp. 1240-1255.
  • Smith, A. Investigación de la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones [1776], Valladolid, Oficina Viuda e hijos de Santander, 1794.
  • Thomas, N. Entangled objects: Exchange material culture, and colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1991.
  • Tool, M. R. “A social value theory in neoinstitutional economics”, Journal of Economic Issues 11, 4, 1977, pp. 823-844.
  • Veblen, T. “The limitations of marginal utility”, Journal of Political Economy 17, 9, 1909, pp. 620-636.
  • Veblen, T. The theory of leisure class: An economic study of institutions [1899], Macmillan, Nueva York, 1915.
  • Verri, P. Tratado elemental de la economía política [1771], Madrid, Imprenta de Espinosa, 1820.
  • Walras, L. Elements of pure economics or the theory of social wealth [1874], Fairfield, Augustus Kelley Publishers, 1977.
  • White, H. “Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in poverty analysis”, World Development 30, 3, 2002, pp. 511-522.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet