Caracterización de los huertos familiares del norte de Uruguay y metodología para su diagnóstico

  1. Traversa, Ignacio
  2. Alejano, Reyes
Journal:
Revista de Ciencias Ambientales

ISSN: 2215-3896

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 45

Issue: 1

Pages: 72-87

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15359/RCA.45-1.7 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de Ciencias Ambientales

Abstract

An ecological, productive and social  diagnosis of homegardens in Northern Uruguay is displayed in this paper, as well as methodology to achieve it, that could be used in other similar systems.  The fieldwork consisted of interactive surveys to producers and field inventories for gathering information on the social, technical, productive and ecologicalaspects of green orchards. . A map of the orchards was done by using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The homegarden is organic, aligned along the minor and major roads and forms cluster cores at the interface between the urban and peri-urban areas. The prospects of the orchards are limited for socio-cultural reasons. Species biodiversity reached a total amount of 187 and an average of 23 species per orchard. Policies are needed for rescueing inherited knowledge that will keep homegardens alive.  

Bibliographic References

  • Abdoellah, O. S., Hadikusumah, H. Y., Takeuch, K., Okubo y Parikesit, S. Y. (2006). Commercialization of homegardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. Agrofore. Syst. 68, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-7475-x
  • Achkar, L. y Domínguez, A. (2000). El sistema ambiental uruguayo. En: Domínguez, A. y Prieto, R. (Eds.), Perfil ambiental del Uruguay (pp. 17-27). Montevideo: Nordan.
  • Agelet, A., Angels, B. M. y Valles, J. (2000). Homegardens and their role as a main source of medicinal plants in mountain regions of Catalonia (Iberian peninsula). Econ. Bot. 54, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02864783
  • Akinnifesi, F. K., Sileshi, G. W., Ajayi, O. C., Akinnifesi, A. I., de Moura, E. G., Linhares, J. F. P. y Rodrigues, I. (2010). Biodiversity of the urban homegardens of São Luís city, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosyst. 13:129-146.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0108-9
  • Águila, C.H. (1987). Agricultura general y especial. Santiago: Universitaria.
  • Arribillaga, B (1969). Plantas medicinales. Montevideo: Nuestra Tierra.
  • Asfaw, Z. y Woldu, Z. (1997). Crop associations of homegardens in Welayta and Gurage in southern Ethiopia. J Sci. 20:73-90.
  • Blengio, M. (2007). Enciclopedia del Uruguay. Barcelona: Océano.
  • Bossi, J. (1975). Carta geológica del Uruguay. Montevideo: Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca.
  • Cerón-Ruiz, J. (1996) Evaluación de sistemas agroforestales tropicales en sistema solar. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
  • Ceccolini, L. (2002). The homegardens of Soqotra island, Yemen: an example of agroforestry approach to multiple land-use in an isolated location. Agrofores Syst. 56:107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021365308193
  • Choudhury, P. R., Rai, P., Patnaik, U. S. y Sitaram, R. (2004). Live fencing practices in the tribal dominated eastern ghats of India. Agrofores Syst. 63:111-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-1123-8
  • de Quadros, F. L. F. y Patta Pillar, V. (2002). Transições Floresta-Campo no Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência & Ambiente, 24:109-118.
  • Dommergues, Y. R. (1987). The role of biological nitrogen fixation in agroforestry. Nairobi: Icraf.
  • Durán, A. (1991). Los suelos del Uruguay. Montevideo: Agropecuaria Hemisferio Sur.
  • Emater. (2004). Empresa de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural, Curso Básico de Agroecología, Ascar, Porto Alegre.
  • Franco, I. y Fontana, V. (2003). Ervas e plantas a medicinais dos simples, Brasil: Vida. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Uruguay). (2010, Diciembre 07). http://www.ine.gub.uy/banco%20de%20datos/soc_pobhogyviv/Censos_T3.xls.
  • Kabir, M. E. y Webb, E. L. (2009). Household and homegarden characteristics in southwestern Bangladesh. Agroforest Syst. 75:129-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9142-5
  • Katewa, S., Chaudhary, B. y Jain, A. (2004). Folk herbal medicines from tribal area of Rajastan, India. J. Ethnopharmacol 92:41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.011
  • Kehlenbeck, K. y Maass, B. L. (2004). Crop diversity and classification of homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agrofores Syst. 63: 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000049433.95038.25
  • Ledezma, R. A. y Granados, R. (2008). Degradación ambiental y caficultura en Tarrazú entre 1970 y 2006. Ambientales 36: 11-18.
  • Kumar B. M. y Nair, P. K. R. (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofores. Syst. 61: 135-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca
  • Markovchick-Nicholls, L., Regan, H. M., Deutschman, D. M., Widyanata, A., Martin, B., Noreke, L. y Hunt, T. A. (2008). Relationships between human disturbance and wildlife land use in urban habitat fragments. Conserv. Biol. 22:99-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00846.x
  • Mollison, B. (1994). Introducción a la permeacultura. Estados Unidos: Winter Hawk Pressi.
  • Mu-oz, J., Ross, P. y Cracco, P. (1993). Flora indígena del Uruguay. Montevideo: Hemisferio Sur.
  • Nair, P. K. R. (2001). Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agrofores. Syst. 53: 239-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013388806993
  • Ricklefs, R. (2003). A Economia na Natureza, Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogarn.
  • Rico-Gray, V., Chemas, A. y Mandujano S. (1991). Use of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatan Maya. Agrofores. Syst. 14:149-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00045730
  • Schroth, G., Lehmann, J., Rodrigues, M. L. R. y Barros, E. (2001). Plant-soil interactions in multistrata agroforestry in the humid tropics. Agrofores. Syst. 53:85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013360000633
  • Sharrow, S. H. y Ismail, S. (2004). Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofores. Syst. 60:123-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000013267.87896.41
  • Soemarwoto, O. (1987). Homegardens: a traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. En: Steppler H. A. y Nair, P. K. R. (Eds), Agroforestry: a decade of development (pp. 157-172). Nairobi: Icraf.
  • Tassin, J., Rivière, J. N., Cazanove,y M. y Bruzzese, E. (2006). Ranking of invasive woody plant species for management on Réunion Island Journal compilation. European Weed Research Society 46:388-403.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00522.x
  • Toledo, V. M. (2008). Metabolismos rurales: hacia una teoría económico-ecológica de la apropiación de la naturaleza. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 7:1-26.
  • Traversa Tejero, I. P. y Alejano Monge, M. R. (2013). Caracterización, distribución y manejo de los bosques nativos en el norte de Uruguay. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84(1):249-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.7550/rmb.23314
  • Traversa Tejero, I. P., Fierros González, A. M., Gómez Cárdenas, M., Leyva López, J. C. y Hernández Rea, A. (2000). Los huertos caseros de Zaachila en Oaxaca, México. Agroforestería en las Américas 28:12-15.
  • Wezel, A. y Bender, S. (2003). Plant species diversity of homegardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supply. Agrofores. Syst. 57:39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022973912195
  • Wiersum, K. F. (2004). Forest gardens as an 'intermediate' land-use system in the nature–culture continuum: Characteristics and future potential. Agrofores. Syst. 61:123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028994.54710.44
Data source: Dialnet