Effects of temporal contexts and contextual habituation on latent inhibition

  1. Andrés Molero-Chamizo 1
  2. G. Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Autonomous University of Baja California (México)
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 29

Número: 3

Páginas: 346-351

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2016.312 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: la inhibición latente del aprendizaje aversivo gustativo (AAG) es sensible a claves externas e internas. La hora del día puede actuar como una clave interna, y la inhibición latente puede ser reducida si pre-exposición y condicionamiento ocurren a diferentes horas del día. Esta clave contextual atribuida a un cambio en la hora del día puede revelar una especificidad temporal de la inhibición latente. Aunque el período de habituación a contextos espaciales es determinante para la especificidad espacial de la inhibición latente del AAG, la influencia de la familiaridad contextual-temporal (hora del día) sobre la inhibición latente del AAG no ha sido explorada mediante comparaciones directas entre diferentes períodos de habituación al contexto temporal. Método: en ratas Wistar se compararon dos diferentes períodos de habituación contextual (corto versus largo) previos a pre-exposiciones gustativas para analizar la influencia de éstos sobre la especificidad temporal de la inhibición latente del AAG. Resultados: un largo período de habituación, en relación con uno corto, facilitó el efecto de un cambio de la hora del día entre pre-exposición y condicionamiento sobre la magnitud de la aversión gustativa. Conclusiones: una larga habituación a contextos temporales facilita la especificidad temporal de la inhibición latente del AAG.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This research was supported by a CICYT grant (BSO2002-01215), Ministry of Science and Technology ?MICYT?, Spain. We are grateful to M. Gallo, I. Mor?n and M.A. Ballesteros which contributed to the execution of the experiments. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arvanitogiannis, A., Sullivan, J., & Amir, S. (2000). Time acts as a conditioned stimulus to control behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in rats. Neuroscience, 101, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00401-2
  • Benstaali, C., Mailloux, A., Bogdan, A., Auzeby, A., & Touitou, Y. (2001). Circadian rhythms of body temperature and motor activity in rodents: Their relationship with the light-dark cycle. Life Sciences, 68, 2645-2656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01081-5
  • Bernstein, I. L. (1999). Taste aversion learning: A contemporary perspective. Nutrition, 15(3), 229-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(98)00192-0
  • Best, M. R. (1975). Conditioned and latent inhibition in taste-aversion learning: Clarifying the role of learned safety. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1(2), 97-113. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.1.2.97
  • Boakes, R. A., Elliot, M., Swinbourne, A. L., & Westbrook, R. F. (1997). Context dependency of conditioned aversions to water and sweet tastes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 230, 56-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.23.1.56
  • Bonardi, C., Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1990). Context-specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205280
  • Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
  • Bouton, M. E., Westbrook, R. F., Corcoran, K. A., & Maren, S. (2006). Contextual and temporal modulations of extinction: Behavioral and biological mechanisms. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 352-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.015
  • De la Casa, L. G., & Lubow, R. E. (1995). Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: The roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 64, 125-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1995.1051
  • De la Casa, L. G., & Lubow, R. E. (2001). Latent inhibition with a response time measure from a within-subject design: Effects of number of preexposures, masking task, context change, and delay. Neuropsychology, 15, 244-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.15.2.244
  • Escobar, M., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (2002). Latent inhibition and contextual associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 123-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.2.123
  • Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.289
  • Gemberling, G. A. (1984). Ingestion of a novel flavor before exposure to pups injected with lithium chloride produces a taste aversion in mother rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98(3), 285-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.98.3.285
  • González, F., García-Burgos, D., & Hall, G. (2012). Associative and occasion-setting properties of contextual cues in flavor-nutrient learning in rats. Appetite, 59, 898-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2012.09.004
  • Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, 38, 121-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748608402224
  • Innis, N. K., & Mills, W. A. (1985). The role of contextual cues in operant responding in rats. Behavioural Processes, 10, 211-218. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0376-6357(85)90068-3
  • Katz, D. B., Rogers, R. F., & Steinmetz, J. E. (2002). Novel factors contributing to the expression of latent inhibition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 824-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0735-7044.116.5.824
  • Lubow, R. E. (2009). Conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition: A review. In S. Reilly & T. R. Schachtman (Eds.), Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes (pp. 37-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lubow, R. E., & De la Casa, L. G. (2005). There is a time and a place for everything: Bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 806-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196774
  • Lubow, R. E., & Weiner, I. (2010). Latent inhibition: Cognition, neuroscience and applications to schizophrenia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lukoyanov, N. V., Pereira, P. A., Mesquita, R. M., & Andrade, J. P. (2002). Restricted feeding facilitates time-place learning in adult rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 134, 283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00036-0
  • Manrique, T., Gámiz, F., Morón, I., Ballesteros, M. A., & Gallo, M. (2009). Peculiar modulation of taste aversion learning by the time of day in developing rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 51, 147-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.20354
  • Manrique, T., Molero, A., Ballesteros, M. A., Morón, I., Gallo, M., & Fenton, A. (2004). Time of day-dependent latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversions in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82, 77-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.04.003
  • Molero, A., Morón, I., Ballesteros, M. A., Manrique, T., Fenton, A., & Gallo, M. (2005). Hippocampus, temporal context and taste memories. Chemical Senses, 30, 160-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh163
  • Molero-Chamizo, A. (2013). Excitotoxic lesion of the hippocampus of Wistar rats disrupts the circadian control of the latent inhibition of taste aversion learning. Brain Research, 1533, 105-113. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.030
  • Molero-Chamizo, A. (2017). Circadian-temporal context and latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion: Effect of restriction in the intake of the conditioned taste stimulus. Learning & Behavior, 45, 157-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0251-0
  • Morin, L. P. (2013). Nocturnal light and nocturnal rodents: Similar regulation of disparate functions? Journal of Biological Rhythms, 28, 95-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748730413481921
  • Morón, I., Manrique, T., Molero, A., Ballesteros, M. A., Gallo, M., & Fenton, A. (2002). The contextual modulation of conditioned taste aversions by the physical environment and time of day is similar. Learning & Memory, 9, 18-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.52202
  • Pearce, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (2001). Theories of associative learning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 111-139. http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.111
  • Quintero, E., Díaz, E., Vargas, J. P., Schmajuk, N., López, J. C., & De la Casa, L. G. (2011). Effects of context novelty vs. familiarity on latent inhibition with a conditioned taste aversion procedure. Behavioural Processes, 86, 242-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.011
  • Quintero, E., Vargas, J. P., Díaz, E., Escarabajal, M. D., Carrasco, M., & López, J. C. (2014). c-Fos positive nucleus reveals that contextual specificity of latent inhibition is dependent of insular cortex. Brain Research Bulletin, 108, 74-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. brainresbull.2014.08.008
  • Ribeiro, T. A., Huziwara, E. M., Montagnoli, T. A., & de Souza, D. D. (2012). Discriminated conditioned suppression in rats. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5(1), 97-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2012.1.13
  • Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Renewal of a conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one. Learning and Motivation, 28, 216-229. http://dx.doi. org/10.1006/lmot.1996.0960
  • Rudy, J. W., Rosenberg, L., & Sandell, J. H. (1977). Disruption of a taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.3.1.26
  • Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.22.3.321
  • Todd, T. P., Winterbauer, N. E., & Bouton, M. E. (2012). Contextual control of appetite. Renewal of inhibited food-seeking behavior in sated rats after extinction. Appetite 58(2), 484-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2011.12.006
  • von Kluge, S., & Brush, F. R. (1992). Conditioned taste and taste-potentiated odor aversions in the Syracuse high- and low-avoidance (SHA/Bru and SLA/Bru) strains of rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106(3), 248-253. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0735-7036.106.3.248
  • Westbrook, R. F., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Harris, J. A. (2000). Contextual control over conditioning responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 157-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.26.2.157
  • Winocur, G., & Hasher, L. (1999). Aging and time-of-day effects on cognition in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 991-997. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0735-7044.113.5.991
  • Yannielli, P. C., & Harrington, M. E. (2001). Neuropeptide Y in the mammalian circadian system: Effects on light-induced circadian responses. Peptides, 22, 547-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00356-4
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet