La gestión de revistasmérito de transferencia universal. Justo y necesario

  1. Repiso, Rafael
  2. Torres-Salinas, Daniel
  3. Aguaded, Ignacio
Journal:
Anuario ThinkEPI

ISSN: 1886-6344

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 13

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3145/THINKEPI.2019.E13E03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Anuario ThinkEPI

Abstract

The relevance of considering editorial management of scientific journals by academic staff as a "knowledgement transfer" is analyzed in the context of the Spanish six-years accreditation process. This is done from two perspectives: justice and necessity. In the first part it is discussed whether scientific publishing should be considered a knowledge transfer merit, while the second part reflects on the need for recognition from the sector. It is concluded that the management of scientific journals is a transfer merit that satisfies all the requirements to be considered as such in the current call.

Bibliographic References

  • Crane, Diana (1967). “The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals”. The American sociologist, v. 2, n. 4, pp. 195–201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27701277
  • Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (1995). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Fernández-Esquinas, Manuel; Pérez-Yruela, Manuel; Merchán-Hernández, Carmen (2006). “El sistema de incentivos y recompensas en la ciencia pública española”. In: Sebastián, Jesús; Muñoz, Emilio (eds.). Radiografía de la investigación pública en España. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, pp. 148–206. ISBN: 84 972 540 5
  • Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo; Delgado-López-Cozar, Emilio; Ruiz-Pérez, Rafael; Fernández, Víctor M. (2002). “Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research”. Nature, v. 417, n. 898. https://www.nature.com/articles/417898b
Data source: Dialnet