Entorno residencial percibido y atracción por el vecindarioUn modelo ex-plicativo en barrios andaluces con difi-cultades sociales

  1. Alejandro Orgambídez-Ramos 1
  2. Fernando Relinque-Medina 1
  3. Yolanda Borrego-Alés 1
  4. Manuela Fernández-Borrero 1
  5. Octavio Vázquez-Aguado 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

Revista:
Revista de estudios regionales

ISSN: 0213-7585

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 118

Páginas: 149-175

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de estudios regionales

Resumen

Diversos estudios han mostrado las relaciones existentes entre satisfacción resi-dencial y vinculación con el vecindario. Sin embargo, las relaciones entre la percepción de riesgo social, la satisfacción residencial y la atracción hacia el vecindario apenas han sido estudiadas. El objetivo de este estudio es examinar el papel predictor de la percepción de riesgo social sobre la atracción por el vecindario. Se obtuvieron datos de una muestra de 404 residentes de promociones de viviendas sociales de Andalucía. Los resultados mostraron que las experiencias y percepciones del entorno de los residentes de promociones de viviendas sociales son importantes predictores de la satisfacción residencial y de la atracción por el vecindario.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACOCK, A. C. (2013): Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata. Texas, StataCorp LP.
  • AMÉRIGO, M. (2002): “A psychological approach to the study of residential satisfaction”. In J. I. ARAGONES, G. FRANCESCATO, & T. GÄRLING (Eds.).Residential Environments. Choice, Satisfaction and Behavior(pp. 81-100). Westport, CT, Bergin & Garvey.
  • BARNES, J., KATZ, I., KORBIN, J. E., & O’BRIEN, M. (2006): Children and Families in Communities. Theory, Research, Policy and Practive. West Sussex, John Wiley&Sons, Ltd.
  • BONAIUTO, M., AIELLO, A., PERUGINI, M., BONNES, M., & ERCOLANI, A. P. (1999): “Multidimensional perception of residential environmentquality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment”. Journal of Enviromental Psychology, 19(4), 331-352. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0138
  • BONAIUTO, M., & ALVES, S. (2012): “Residential places and neighbourhoods: Toward healthy life, social integration, and reputable residence”. En S. D. CLAYTON (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology(pp. 221-274). New York, Oxford University Press.
  • BONAIUTO, M., FORNARA, F., & BONNES, M. (2003): “Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study in the city of Rome”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 41-52.
  • BUCKNER, J. C. (1988): “The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion”. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791. doi:10.1007/BF00930892
  • BWALYA, J., & SEETHAL, C. (2016): “Neihbourhood context and social cohesion in Southern wood, East London, South Africa”. Urban Studies, 53(1), 40-56. doi:10.1177/0042098014560502
  • COULTON, C. J., & KORBIN, J. E. (2007): “Indicators of childwell-beingthrough a neighborhood”. Social Indicators Research, 84, 349-361. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9119-1
  • DEBEK, M., & JANDA-DEBEK, B. (2015): “Perceived Residential Environment Quality and Neighborhood Attachment (PREQ & NA) Indicators by Marino Bonaiuto, Ferdinando Fornara, and Mirilia Bonnes – Polish Adaptation”. PolishJournal of Applied Psychology, 13(2), 111-162. doi:10.1515/pjap-2015-0032
  • DEMPSEY, N. (2009): “Are Good-Quality Environments Socially Cohesive? Measuring Quality and Cohesion in Urban Neighbourhoods”. Town Planning Review, 80(3), 315-345. doi:10.3828/tpr.80.3.5EUROFOUND. (2014): Social cohesion and well-being in the EU. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the Europe Union.
  • FELDMAN, P. J., & STEPTOE, A. (2004): “How neighborhhods and physical functioning are related: The roles of neighborhood socioeconomoic status, perceived neighborhood strain, and individual heath risk factors”. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(2), 91-99. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2702_3
  • FONE, D., WHITE, J., FAREWELL, D., KELLY, M., JOHN, G., LLOYD, K., DUNSTAN, F. (2014): “Effect of neighbourhood deprivation and social cohesion on mental health inequality: A multi level population-based longitudinal study”. Psychological Medicine, 44(11), 2449-2449. doi:10.1017/S0033291713003255
  • FORREST, R., & KEARNS, A. (2001): “Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood”. Urban Studies, 38(2), 2125-2143. doi:10.1080/00420980120087081
  • GAPEN, M., CROSS, D., ORTIGO, K., GRAHAM, A., JOHNSON, E., EVCES, M., & RESSLER, K. (2011): “Perceived neighborhood disorder, community cohesion, and PTSD symptons among low-income africanamericans in an urban health setting”. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 31-37. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01069.x
  • GARCÍA, C., CARRASCO, J. A., & ROJAS, C. (2014): “El contexto urbano y las interacciones sociales: dualidad del espacio de actividades de sectores de ingresos altos y bajos en Concepción, Chile”. EURE (Santiago), 40(121), 75-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000300004
  • HAYES, A. F. (2013): Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional processanalysis. A regression-based approach. London,The Guilford Press.
  • HÖFELMANN, D. A., DIEZ-ROUZ, A. V., ANTUNES, J. L., & PERES, M. A. (2013): “Perceived neighborhood problems: Multi level analysis to evaluate psychometric properties in a Southern adult Brazilian population”. BMC Public Health, 13, 1085. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1085
  • HU, L., & BENTLER, P. M. (1999): “Cutoff criteria forfit indexes in covariancE structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • KUIPERS, M. A., POPPEI, M. N., DEN BRINK, W., WINGEN, M., & KUNST, A. E. (2012): “The association between neighbourhood disorder, social cohesion and hazardous alcohol use: A national multilevel study”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 126(1-2), 27-34. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.04.008
  • LOVEJOY, K., HANDT, S., & MOKHTARIAN, P. (2010): “Neighborhood Satisfaction in Suburban versus Traditional Environments: An Evaluation of Contribut in Characteristics in Eight Califorinia Neighborhoods”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.010
  • MCGUIRE, J. B. (1997): “The Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Describing Neighbourhood Characteristics Relevant to Families and Young Children Living in Urban Areas”. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 551-566.
  • MONTERO, I., & LEÓN, O. G. (2007): “A guide fornaming research studies in Psychology”. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
  • NASH, V., & CHRISTIE, I. (2003): Making Sense of Community. London, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • NAVAS, J. M. (2002): Métodos, diseños y técnicas de investigación psicológica. Madrid, UNED.
  • ORGÁMBIDEZ-RAMOS, A. & BORREGO-ALÉS, Y. (2016): “Las características de los inquilinos usuarios de viviendas sociales. Percepción del entorno y de la cohesión social”. En O. VÁZQUEZ-AGUADO & F. RELINQUE-MEDINA (Eds.) Vivienda e intervención social (pp. 99-120). Madrid, Dykinson.
  • ORGÁMBIDEZ-RAMOS, A. & BORREGO-ALÉS, RELINQUE-MEDINA, F., FERNÁNEZ-BORRERO, M. & VÁZQUEZ-AGUADO, O. (2015): “The influence of situational awareness on social cohesion in neighbourhoods with social difficulties”. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 51, 7-20.
  • OSBORNE, K., ZIERSCH, A. M., BAUM, F. E., & GALLAGHER, G. (2012): “Australian Aboriginal Urban Resident’s Satisfaction with Living in Their Neighbourhood: Perceptions of the Neighbourhood Socio-cultural Environment and Individual Socio-demographic Factors”. UrbanStudies, 49(11), 2459-2477. doi:10.1177/0042098011428179
  • GAPEN, M., CROSS, D., ORTIGO, K., GRAHAM, A., JOHNSON, E., EVCES, M., & RESSLER, K. (2011): “Perceived neighborhood disorder, community cohesion, and PTSD symptons among low-income africanamericans in an urban health setting”. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 31-37. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01069.x
  • GARCÍA, C., CARRASCO, J. A., & ROJAS, C. (2014): “El contexto urbano y las interacciones sociales: dualidad del espacio de actividades de sectores de ingresos altos y bajos en Concepción, Chile”. EURE (Santiago), 40(121), 75-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000300004
  • HAYES, A. F. (2013): Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional processanalysis. A regression-based approach. London,The Guilford Press.
  • HÖFELMANN, D. A., DIEZ-ROUZ, A. V., ANTUNES, J. L., & PERES, M. A. (2013): “Perceived neighborhood problems: Multi level analysis to evaluate psychometric properties in a Southern adult Brazilian population”. BMC Public Health, 13, 1085. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1085
  • HU, L., & BENTLER, P. M. (1999): “Cutoff criteria forfit indexes in covariancE structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • KUIPERS, M. A., POPPEI, M. N., DEN BRINK, W., WINGEN, M., & KUNST, A. E. (2012): “The association between neighbourhood disorder, social cohesion and hazardous alcohol use: A national multilevel study”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 126(1-2), 27-34. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.04.008
  • LOVEJOY, K., HANDT, S., & MOKHTARIAN, P. (2010): “Neighborhood Satisfaction in Suburban versus Traditional Environments: An Evaluation of Contribut in Characteristics in Eight Califorinia Neighborhoods”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.010
  • MCGUIRE, J. B. (1997): “The Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Describing Neighbourhood Characteristics Relevant to Families and Young Children Living in Urban Areas”. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 551-566.
  • MONTERO, I., & LEÓN, O. G. (2007): “A guide fornaming research studies in Psychology”. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
  • NASH, V., & CHRISTIE, I. (2003): Making Sense of Community. London, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • NAVAS, J. M. (2002): Métodos, diseños y técnicas de investigación psicológica. Madrid, UNED.
  • ORGÁMBIDEZ-RAMOS, A. & BORREGO-ALÉS, Y. (2016): “Las características de los inquilinos usuarios de viviendas sociales. Percepción del entorno y de la cohesión social”. En O. VÁZQUEZ-AGUADO & F. RELINQUE-MEDINA (Eds.) Vivienda e intervención social (pp. 99-120). Madrid, Dykinson.
  • ORGÁMBIDEZ-RAMOS, A. & BORREGO-ALÉS, RELINQUE-MEDINA, F., FERNÁNEZ-BORRERO, M. & VÁZQUEZ-AGUADO, O. (2015): “The influence of situational awareness on social cohesion in neighbourhoods with social difficulties”. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 51, 7-20.
  • OSBORNE, K., ZIERSCH, A. M., BAUM, F. E., & GALLAGHER, G. (2012): “Australian Aboriginal Urban Resident’s Satisfaction with Living in Their Neighbourhood: Perceptions of the Neighbourhood Socio-cultural Environment and Individual Socio-demographic Factors”. UrbanStudies, 49(11), 2459-2477. doi:10.1177/00420980114281795
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet