Comportamientos sexuales convencionales, en solitario, a través de las TIC y no convencionales en jóvenes heterosexuales

  1. Andrea Blanc Molina
  2. Antonio Rojas Tejada
Journal:
Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud

ISSN: 1989-9882,  2444-6513

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 8

Issue: 2

Pages: 207-218

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20318/RECS.2017.4001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyse different types of sexual behaviors (SB; conventional dyadic, solitary, via ICT, and unconventional SB) which young people report having performed or could perform, and to establish a comparison between women and men. A total of 886 heterosexual young people between 18 and 30 years selected by incidental and snowball sampling participated. A questionnaire via internet collecting information about conventional dyadic, solitary, via ICT, and unconventional SB was applied. A higher proportion of men than women perform SB such as solitary masturbation, sexual fantasies, cybersex, and threesome. The differences increase when the possibility of performing SB in the future is considered (also in anal sex and group sex). Unconventional SB and cybersex differences may be influenced by sexual double standards. Recent studies show that the sexual double standards may be disappearing for conventional SB, but may still be present for unconventional SB.

Bibliographic References

  • Bermúdez, M. P., Buela-Casal, G. y Teva, I. (2011). Type of sexual contact and precoital sexual experience in Spanish adolescents. Universitas Psychologica, 10(2), 411-421.
  • Bordini, G. S. y Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality & Culture, 17(4), 686-704. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0
  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19-31. doi: 10.1080/00224499809551914
  • Bussey, K. y Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4),676-713.
  • Daneback, K., Cooper, A. y Månsson, S. A. (2005). An internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(3), 321–328. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-3120-z
  • Eagly, A. H. y Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
  • Faílde, J. M., Lameiras, M. y Bimbela, J. L. (2008). Prácticas sexuales de chicos y chicas españoles de 14-24 años de edad. Gaceta Sanitaria, 22(6), 511-519. doi: 10.1590/S0213-91112008000600002
  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Almendros, C., Borrajo, E. y Calvete, E. (2015). Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(2), 145-154. doi: 10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9
  • Häggström-Nordin, E., Hanson, U. y Tydén, T. (2005). Associations between pornography consumption and sexual practices among adolescents in Sweden. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 16(2), 102-107. doi: 10.1258/0956462053057512
  • Jonason, P. K. y Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60(5), 357-365. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z
  • Milhausen, R. R. y Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 361-368. doi: 10.1080/00224499909552008
  • Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L. y Chirumbolo A. (2016). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 28(2), 137-142. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.193
  • Muise, A., Giang, E. y Impett, E. A. (2014). Post Sex Affectionate Exchanges Promote Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1391-1402. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0305-3
  • Petersen, J. L. y Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality: 1993 to 2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21-38. doi: 10.1037/a0017504
  • Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America: A sociological investigation of the relative social and cultural integration of American sexual standards. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Rodríguez, O. R. (2010). Relación entre satisfacción sexual, ansiedad y prácticas sexuales. Pensamiento Psicológico, 7(14), 41-52.
  • Rodríguez, J. y Traverso, C.I. (2012). Conductas sexuales en adolescentes de 12 a 17 años de Andalucía. Gaceta Sanitaria, 26(6), 519-524.
  • Samimi, P. y Alderson, K. G. (2014). Sexting among undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.027
  • Sprecher, S., Regan, P. C., McKinney, K., Maxwell, K. y Wazienski, R. (1997). Preferred level of sexual experience in a date or mate: The merger of two methodologies. Journal of Sex Research, 34(4), 327-337. doi: 10.1080/00224499709551901
  • Thompson, A. E. y Byers, E. S. (2017). Heterosexual Young Adults ́ Interest, Attitudes, and Experiences Related to Mixed-Gender, Multi-Person Sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 813-822. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0699-1
  • Wolak, J. y Finkelhor, D. (2011, marzo). Sexting: A typology. Crimes against Children. Research Center.Recuperado el día 4 de noviembre de 2016: www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV231_Sexting%20Typology%20Bulletin_4-6-11_revised.pdf
Data source: Dialnet