"I hope they don't get forgotten". A descriptive corpus-based approach to get-passives with verbs of cognition in English

  1. Romero, Luisa González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

Revista:
Philologica canariensia

ISSN: 1136-3169

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 27

Páginas: 65-94

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.20420/PHIL.CAN.2021.376 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Philologica canariensia

Resumen

En los estudios sobre la pasiva con get en inglés, la idea de que esta construcción solo admite verbos dinámicos, no siendo aceptables las oraciones formadas con verbos estativos, está ampliamente extendida. No obstante, a partir del análisis de un extenso corpus de pasivas con get con los verbos forget, know, remember, understand y believe, este estudio demuestra que esta estructura, aunque infrecuente, es posible en inglés con verbos estativos de cognición. Asimismo, la construcción se analiza en relación con las características formales, semánticas y pragmáticas que distinguen a la pasiva con get prototípica. El análisis revela, por un lado, que estas propiedades no presentan la misma relevancia en la caracterización de estas oraciones y, por otro, que existen fuertes conexiones entre ellas y los rasgos léxicos de los verbos analizados.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALEXIADOU, A. 2005. “A Note on Non-Canonical Passives: The Case of the Get-Passive”, in Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huybregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., Koster, J. and Huijbregts, R. (eds.), Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 13-21.
  • ANDERWALD, L. 2017. “GET, GET-Constructions and the GET-Passive in 19th-Century English: Corpus Analysis and Prescriptive Comments”, in Hoffmann, S., Sand, A. and Arndt-Lappe, S. (eds.), Exploring Recent Diachrony: Corpus Studies of Lexicogrammar and Language Practices in Late Modern English. Helsinki: Helsinki University. Retrieved from https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/18/anderwald/.
  • ARCE-ARENALES, M., AXELROD, M. and FOX, B. A. 1994. “Active Voice and Middle Diathesis. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective”, in Fox, B. A. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-21.
  • BANKS, D. 1985. “Getting by with GET”, La Linguistique, 22(1), pp. 125-130.
  • BIBER, D., CONRAD, S. and LEECH, G. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
  • BINNICK, R. I. 2006. “Aspect and Aspectuality”, in Aarts, B. and McMahon, A. (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. London: Blackwell, pp. 244-268.
  • CARTER, R. and MCCARTHY, M. 1999. “The English Get-Passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implications for an Interpersonal Grammar”, English Language & Linguistics, 3(1), pp. 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067439900012X.
  • CHAPPELL, H. 1980. “Is the Get-Passive Adversative?”, Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 13 (3), pp. 411-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818009370504.
  • COLLINS, P. C. 1996. “Get-Passives in English”, World Englishes, 15(1), pp. 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00091.x.
  • COMRIE, B. 1976. Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • COTO VILLALIBRE, E. 2015a. “The ‘Fading’ of the Definitory Characteristics of Get-Passives: An Outer Circle Innovation?”, in Lázaro Lafuente, A. and Porto Requejo, M. D. (eds.), English and American Studies in Spain: New Developments and Trends. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, pp. 181-188.
  • COTO VILLALIBRE, E. 2015b. “Is the Get-Passive Really that Adversative?”, Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, 51, pp. 13-30. Retrieved from https://www.miscelaneajournal.net/index.php/misc/article/view/293/147.
  • DAVIES, M. 2016. Davies, Mark. (2016-) Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/now/.
  • DECLERCK, R., REED, S. and CAPPELLE, B. 2006. The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • DOWNING, A. 1996. “The Semantics of Get-Passives”, in Hasan, R., Cloran, C. and Butt, D. G. (eds.), Functional Descriptions. Theory in Practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 179-205.
  • FLEISHER, N. 2006. “The Origins of Passive Get”, English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), pp. 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306001912.
  • “forget, v.” 2020. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/.
  • GIVÓN, T. and YANG, L. 1994. “The Rise of the English GET-Passive”, in Fox, B. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 119-149.
  • GOTOWSKI, M. K. 2016. “Secondary Agents in Get-Passives: Syntax or Pragmatics?”, Proceedings of the Third Linguistics Conference at the University of Georgia, pp. 1-10.
  • GUERRERO MEDINA, P. 2009. “Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints on the English Get-Passive”, in Buttler, C. S. and Martín Arista, J. (eds.), Decontrasting Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 271-294.
  • HALLIDAY, M. A. K. and MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. 2004 (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • HATCHER, A. G. 1949. “To Get/Be Invited”, Modern Language Notes, 64(7), pp. 433-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2910009.
  • HUDDLESTON, R. and PULLUM, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • HUNDT, M. 2001. “What Corpora Tell Us about the Grammaticalisation of Voice in Get-Constructions”, Studies in Language, 25(1), pp. 49-88. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.1.03hun.
  • JESPERSEN, O. 1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part IV, Syntax. Vol. 3. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • KIM, J.-B. 2012. “English Get-Passive Constructions: A Corpus-Based Approach”, Studies in Generative Grammar, 22(2), pp. 437-457. Retrieved from http://web.khu.ac.kr/~jongbok/research/2012/2012-dom-get.passive.pdf.
  • LAKOFF, R. 1971. “Passive Resistance”, Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 149-162.
  • LANGACKER, R. W. 1991. Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • LEECH, G., HUNDT, M., MAIR, C. and SMITH, N. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • LINDSTROMBERG, S. 1999. “Get: Not Many Meanings”, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(4), pp. 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1991.29.4.285.
  • MAIR, C. and LEECH, G. 2006. “Current Changes in English Syntax”, in McMahon, A. and Aarts, B. (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. London: Backwell, pp. 318-342.
  • MARTÍNEZ VÁZQUEZ, M. 1989. “Valores aspectuales de get + participio pasivo en el inglés actual”, Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 12, pp. 187-195.
  • MITKOVSKA, L. and BUŽAROVSKA, E. 2012. “An Alternative Analysis of the English Get-Past Participle Constructions: Is Get All That Passive?”, Journal of English Linguistics, 40(2), pp. 196-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211418978.
  • PALMER, F. R. 1988 (1974). The English Verb. London: Longman.
  • PHOOCHAROENSIL, S. 2020. “English Get-Passives: Reassessing the Frequencies across Genres”, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(3), pp. 123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2003-08.
  • QUIRK, R., GREENBAUM, S., LEECH, G. and SVARTVIK, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
  • RÜHLEMANN, C. 2007. “Lexical Grammar: the GET-Passive as a Case in Point”, ICAME Journal, 31, pp. 111-127. Retrieved from https://www.uni-marburg.de/de/fb10/iaa/institut/personen/ruehlemann/lexical_grammar-proofs5.pdf.
  • SCHWARZ, S. 2017. “‘Like Getting Nibbled to Death by a Duck’. Grammaticalization of the GET-Passive in the TIME Magazine Corpus”, English World-Wide, 38(3), pp. 305-355. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.3.03sch.
  • SCHWARZ, S. 2019. “Signs of Grammaticalization. Tracking the GET-Passive through COHA”, in Claridge, C. and Bös, B. (eds.), Developments in Historical Morpho-Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 199-221.
  • SMITH, C. S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • THOMPSON, D., LING, S. P., MYACHYKOV, A., FERREIRA, F. and SCHEEPERS, C. 2013. “Patient-Related Constraints on Get- and Be-Passive Uses in English: Evidence from Paraphrasing”, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00848.
  • THOMPSON, D. and SCHEEPERS, C. 2013. “Harmonizing the Passive: A New Proposal for Passive Constructions in Generative Grammar”, Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 19(2), pp. 74-95.
  • TOYOTA, J. 2007. “An Adversative Passive in English: in Search of Origins”, in Delbecque, N. and Cornillie, B. (eds.), On Interpreting Construction Schemas: From Action and Motion to Transitivity and Causality. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, pp. 143-169.
  • VANRESPAILLE, M. 1991. “A Semantic Analysis of the English Get-Passive”, INTERFACE. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), pp. 95-112.
  • VENDLER, Z. 1957. “Verbs and Times”, The Philosophical Review, 66(2), pp. 143-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.
  • WANNER, A. 2009. Deconstructing the English Passive. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
  • WANNER, A. 2013. “The Get-Passive at the Intersection of Get and the Passive”, in Alexiadou, A. and Schäfer, F. (eds.), Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today: Non-Canonical Passives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 43-61.
  • YONEKURA, Y. 1999. “On the Semantic Development of Get”, Osaka University Papers in English Linguistics, 4, pp. 205-229. https://doi.org/10.18910/72948.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet