Análisis de las distintas dimensiones de la “escala gr-sippel” en las categorías infantil y cadete de las escuelas sociodeportivas de baloncesto de la fundación Real Madrid.

  1. Gema Ortega Vila 1
  2. Francisco Javier Giménez 2
  3. Manuel Tomás Abad Robles 2
  4. José Robles Rodríguez 2
  1. 1 Fundación Real Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

Journal:
Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes: REEFD

ISSN: 1133-6366

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: XIV Congreso Internacional AEISAD

Issue: 418

Pages: 654-661

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes: REEFD

Abstract

One of the main purposes of the Real Madrid Foundation Social Sport Basketball Schools has been, since its inception, the search for a differ-ent sport model where the promotion of educational values is the true backbone of the project. To do this, we are carrying out various training activities aimed at teachers, families and students participating in our sports schools. Currently, to evaluate different aspects of the process of socialization of students, we have used the "GR-SIPPEL" scale (Ruiz, Graupera, Moreno and Rico, 2010). This scale assesses the following di-mensions: cooperation, competition, individualism and affiliation. In this sense, the main purpose of the pre-sent work was to describe the differ-ent social interaction preferences of boys and girls of U14 and U16 cate-gories (12-16 years) involved in the Real Madrid Foundation Social Sport Basketball Schools. A descriptive analysis of each of the dimensions was performed, ratio analysis using contingency tables, using the statistical X2, in relation to gender and practice time in schools. It was calculated the V Cramer and residuals corrected. Also it conduct-ed a correlation analysis between dimensions. The results show that the dimension most valued by young people is cooperation, also it detect-ed that girls tend to be more affilia-tive than boys. In addition, young people who tend to be more coopera-tive also tend to be more affiliative, while individualists tend to be more competitive.

Bibliographic References

  • Kahila, S. (1993). The role of teaching method in prosocial learning: developing helping behaviour by means of the cooperative teaching method in physical education. Tesis doctoral. Jyvaskyla, Universidad de Jyvaskyla.
  • Ortega, G.; Giménez, F.J.; Frnaco, J.; Jiménez, A.C.; Durán, L.J.; Jiménez, P.J. (2012). Iniciación al baloncesto. Madrid. Fundación Real Madrid.
  • Rico, I. (2003). Estructuras de interacción y clima motivacional en los escolares de la ESO en E.F. Tesis doctoral inédita. Universidad de Castilla la Mancha.
  • Ruiz, L. M., Graupera, J. L., Moreno, J. A., y Rico, I. (2010). Social preferences for learning among adolescents in Secondary Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 3-20.
  • Ruiz, L. M., Graupera, J. L., Rico, I., y Mata, E. (2004). Preferencias participativas en Educación Física de los chicos y chicas de la Educación Secundaria mediante la “Escala GR de Participación Social en el Aprendizaje. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 12, 151-168.
  • Ruiz, L. M., Mendoza, N., Del Valle, S., Rico, I., y Graupera, J. L. (2000). Orientación participativa y motivación para aprender en educación física y deporte en escolares de la ESO y Bachillerato. Documento inédito. Universidad de Toledo.
Data source: Dialnet