Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP)an interdependence analysis of self-reports

  1. Luis Rodríguez-Franco 1
  2. Joel Juarros-Basterretxea 2
  3. Susana Paíno-Quesada 3
  4. Juan Herrero 4
  5. Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Díaz 4
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  3. 3 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

  4. 4 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 91-100

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2021.100276 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Resumen

Antecedentes/Objetivo: Aunque existen instrumentos de medida de la violencia en la pareja (IPV), no se ha evaluado su validez considerando la interdependencia entre los autoinformes de victimización y perpetración con datos diádicos. El objetivo fue evaluar la validez y fiabilidad del Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios (CuViNo) incluyendo la interdependencia entre los autoinformes de victimización y perpetración de los miembros de parejas actuales. Método: Seiscientas dieciséis parejas heterosexuales de adultos jóvenes participaron en el estudio. Cada participante respondió de manera independiente a las versiones de victimización y perpetración del CuViNo. Resultados: El modelo de interdependencia victimización-perpetración basado en datos diádicos mostró un buen ajuste a los datos e invarianza entre sexos. Todos los factores correlacionaron significativamente y fueron fiables. Conclusiones: El CuViNo es un instrumento válido y fiable para la medición independiente de perpetración y victimización de IPV en adolescentes y adultos-jóvenes, pero también para la medición interdependiente de ambas. El CuViNo también es invariante entre sexos, lo que permite comparar los resultados de hombres y mujeres. Estos resultados muestran la relevancia de tener en cuenta la interdependencia entre victimización y perpetración, así como de cuidar la excesiva confianza en los autoinformes individuales centrados en la perpetración o la victimización a la hora de alcanzar un conocimiento preciso.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alfaro-Urquiola, A. (2020). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnaire-R (DVQ-R) in a sample of young people from La Paz. Ajayu, 18, 102–120.
  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guildford.
  • Cantos, A. L., Kosson, D. S., Goldstein, D. A., & O’Leary, K. D (2019). Treatment impact on recidivism of family only vs. generally violent partner violence perpetrators. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.05.002.
  • Cherrez-Santos, A., V., Alulema-Sanchez, S., & Juarros-Basterretxea, J. (in press). Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire-R in women from Ecuador. Revista Electronica de Metodología Aplicada.
  • CDC. (2020). Preventing intimate partner violence. . https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html.
  • Cunha, O., & Gonc¸ alves, R. A. (2017). Male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A comparison between incarcerated and community offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62, 3260–3277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x17741070.
  • Dardis, C. M., Dixon, K. J., Edwards, K. M., & Turchik, J. A. (2015). An examination of the factors related to dating violence perpetration among young men and women and associated theoretical explanations: A review of literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013517559.
  • Duval, A., Lanning, B. A., & Patterson, M. S. (2020). A systematic review of dating violence risk factors among undergraduate college students. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21, 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018782207.
  • Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K. M., & Neal, A. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5, 112–121. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038656.
  • Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Reliability coefficients for categorical response scales. Psicothema, 20, 896–901.
  • Exner-Cortens, Eckenrode, J., Bunge, J., & Rothman, E (2017). Revictimization after adolescent dating violence in a matched, national sample of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.015.
  • Exner-Cortens, D., Gill, L., & Eckenrode, J. (2016a). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 1, behaviors). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007.
  • Exner-Cortens, D., Gill, L., & Eckenrode, J. (2016b). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 2, attitudes). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007.
  • Gancedo, Y., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Vilariño, M., & Arce, R. (2021). Reality Monitoring: A meta-analytical review for forensic practice. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a10.
  • Hammock, G. S., Richardson, D. S., Lamm, K. B., Taylor, E., & Verlaque, L. (2017). The effect of gender of perpetrator and victim on perceptions of psychological and physical intimate partner aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9850-y.
  • Harden, J., McAllister, P., Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. M. (2020). The dark side of the rainbow: Queer women’s experiences of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933869 Advanced online publication.
  • Hardesty, J. L., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2020). A socioecological perspective on intimate partner violence research: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12652.
  • Herrero, J., Rejano-Hernandez, L., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2020). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model in the study of aggression and victimization within couples: an empirical examination in 361 dyads. Psychosocial Intervention, 29, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a12.
  • Herrero, J., Torres, A., Fernández-Suárez, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2016). Generalists versus specialists: Toward a typology of batterers in prison. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.09.002.
  • Herrero, J., Torres, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2018). Child abuse, risk in male partner selection and intimate partner violence victimization of women of the European Union. Prevention Science, 19, 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0911-8.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Jennings, W. G., Okeem, C., Piquero, A. R., Sellers, C. S., Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). Dating and intimate partner violence among Young persons ages 15-30: Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.007.
  • Johnson, W. L., Taylor, B. G., Mumford, E. A., & Liu, W. (2020). Dyadiccorrelatesoftheperpetrationofpsychologicalaggressionamongintimatepartners. Psychology of Violence, 10, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000257.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Herrero, J., Escoda-Menéndez, P., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2020). Cluster B personality traits and psychological intimate partner violence: Considering the mediational role of alcohol. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922351 Advanced online publication.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Herrero, J., Fernández-Suárez, A., Perez, B., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2018). Are generalist batterers different from generally extra-family violent men? A study among imprisoned male violent offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 10, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018v10n1a1.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Ocampo, N. Y., Herrero, J., & RodríguezDíaz, F. J. (in press). Dyadic analysis of emotional intimate partner violence: An empirical examination among 242 dyads. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Overall, N., Herrero, J., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2019). Considering the effect of sexism on psychological intimate partner violence: A study with imprisoned men. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2019a1.
  • Lara, L., & López-Cepero, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire: Reviewing the evidence in Chilean Youths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760612 Advanced online publication.
  • Laskey, P., Bates, E. A., & Taylor, J. C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.014.
  • Lin, W. H., & Chiao, C. (2020). Adverse adolescence experiences, feeling lonely across life stages and loneliness in adulthood. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 20, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.006.
  • Lin, K., Hu, R., Wang, X., & Xue, J. (2020). Female same-sex bidirectional intimate partner violence in China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959624 Advanced online publication..
  • López-Cepero, J., Fabelo, H. E., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2016). The Dating Violence Questionnaire: Validation of the Cuestionario de Violencia de Novios using a college sample from the United States. Violence and Victims, 31, 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00077.
  • López-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2015). Measuring intimate partner abuse. A review of behavioral assessment tools. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluación Psicológica, 2, 37–50.
  • Marcos, V., Gancedo, Y., Castro, B., & Selaya, A. (2020). Dating violence victimization, perceived gravity in dating violence behaviors, sexism, romantic love myths and emotional dependence between female and male adolescents. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 11, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.040.
  • Martínez-Gómez, J. A., Bolívar-Suarez, Y., Rey-Anacona, C. A., Ramírez-Ortiz, L. C., Lizarazo-Ojeda, A. M., & Yanez Peruñuñi, L. Y. (2021). Traditional schemes of sexual gender roles, power in relationships and dating violence. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.041.
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña Gómez, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González Lozano, P. (2007). Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships in Spanish university students. Psicothema, 19, 102–107.
  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh edition. Author.
  • Park, S., & Kim, S. H. (2019). Who Are the Victims and Who Are the Perpetrators in Dating Violence? Sharing the Role of Victim and Perpetrator. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017730648.
  • Peitzmeier, S. M., Malik, M., Kattari, S. K., Marrow, E., Stephenson, R., Agenor, M., & Reisner, S. L. (2020). Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020. 305774 Advanced online publication.
  • Presaghi, F., Manca, M., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Curcio, G. (2015). A questionnaire for the assessment of violent behaviors in Young couples: the Italian version of Dating Violence Questionnaire (DVQ). PLOS One, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126089 Article e0126089.
  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.
  • Ramiro-Sanchez, T., Ramiro, M. T., Bermudez, M. P., & Buela-Casal, G. (2018). Sexism in adolescent relationships: A systematic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a1900002.
  • Riesgo González, N., Fernández-Suarez, A., Herrero, J., Rejano-Hernández, L., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Paino-Quesada, S. G., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2019). Concordancia en la percepcion de conductas violentas en parejas adolescentes. Terapia psicologica, 37, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082019000200154.
  • Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Bringas-Molleda, C., Paíno-Quesada, S. G., & Perez-Sanchez, B. (2017). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnarie-R (DVQ-R). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.09.001.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Antuña, M. A., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero, F. J., & Nieves, V. E. (2007). Violencia de genero en relaciones de pareja durante la adolescencia: analisis diferencial del Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios (CuViNo). In R. Arce, F. Farina, E. Alfaro, C. Civera, F. Tortosa (Eds.), ~ Psicología jurídica. Violencia y víctimas (pp. 137 147). Council of Valencia.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Gracia, C., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Fernandez-Suárez, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2017). Generalist and specialist batterers in teen and young dating violence: Implications for development of prevention programs. Accion Psicologica , 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.2.20743.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Lopez-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Bringas, C., Antuna, A., & Estrada, C. (2010). Validación del Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios (CUVINO) en jovenes hispanohablantes: Analisis de resultados en España, México y Argentina. Anuario de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud /Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 45–53.
  • Rojas-Solís, J. L., Guzmán-Pimentel, M., Jimenez-Castro, M. P., Martínez-Ruíz, L., & Flores-Hernandez, B. G. (2019). Violence towards men in the heterosexual couple: A review. Ciencia y Sociedad, 44, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2019.v44i1.pp57-70.
  • Rubio-Garay, F., Lopez-González, M. A., Carrasco, M. A., & Amor, P. J. (2017). The prevalence of dating violence: A systematic review. Psychologist Papers, 38, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2017.2831.
  • Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540.
  • Sjodin, € A. K., Wallinius, M., Billstedt, E., Hofvander, B., & Nilsson, T. (2017). Dating violence compared to other types of violence: Similar offenders but different victims. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.03.001.
  • Smith, J., Mulford, C., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A. T., Niolon, P. H., & Blachman-Demner, D. (2015). Tacking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1049767.
  • Schnurr, M. P., Lohman, B. J., & Kaura, S. A. (2010). Variation in late adolescents' reports of dating violence perpetration: a dyadic analysis. Violence and Victims, 25, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.1.84.
  • Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2019). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplusand the lavaan/semTools Packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776.
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.
  • Vilariño, M., Amado, B. G., Vazquez, M. J., & Arce, R. (2018). Psychological harm in women victims of intimate partner violence: Epidemiology and quantification of injury in mental health markers. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a23.
  • Wincentak, K., Connolly, J., & Card, N. (2017). Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence, 7, 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040194.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet