Aportaciones del Análisis Conductual al estudio de la conducta emergentealgunos fenómenos experimentales

  1. García García, Andrés
  2. Gómez Bujedo, Jesús
  3. Pérez Fernández, Vicente J.
  4. Bohórquez Zayas, Cristóbal
  5. Gutiérrez Domínguez, María Teresa
Revista:
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Año de publicación: 2004

Volumen: 4

Número: 1

Páginas: 37-66

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

Resumen

En las últimas décadas de investigación básica desde la perspectiva del Análisis Experimental del Comportamiento se ha prestado una especial atención a los fenómenos complejos de control de estimulo capaces de generar comportamiento emergente o "creativo". Estas investigaciones han permitido abordar experimentalmente algunos procesos psicológicos típicamente humanos como la formación de conceptos, la producción y comprensión de la conducta verbal y simbólica, la conciencia y el razonamiento complejo. De manera complementaria, se han realizado también extensas investigaciones sobre las bases conductuales de estos fenómenos en animales no humanos. En este trabajo se describen de forma integrada una selección de fenómenos experimentales representativos que sirven p a explicar comportamientos progresivamente más complejos, y que emergen como a combinación entre la historia de reforzamiento de los sujetos y una situación novedosa.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arias, M.F., Benjumea, S. y Fernández, F. (1998). La ley del efecto y el origen de la conducta. Apuntes de Psicología, 16, 259-282.
  • Arnold, H.M., Grahame, N.J. y Miller, R.R. (1991). Higher order occasion setting. Animal Learning and Behavior, 19, 58-64.
  • Barnes, D., Hegarty, N. y Smeets, P.M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: a relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
  • Benjumea, S. (1993). Condicionamiento Instrumental Humano. En J.I. Navarro (Ed.), Aprendizaje y Memoria Humana (pp. 441-479). Madrid: Ed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Benjumea, S. y Arias, M.F. (1993). Pigeon’s novel behavior governer by multiple controlling stimulus. The Psychological Record, 43, 455-470.
  • Benjumea, S. y Gutiérrez, M.T. (1999). Equivalencias funcionales en los juicios de causalidad en humanos. XI Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Psicología Comparada. Baeza, Jaén.
  • Boelens, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587- 605.
  • Bohórquez, C., García, A., Pérez, V., Gómez, J. y Gutiérrez, M.T. (2001). Ensombrecimiento entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. Suma Psicológica, 8, 251-270.
  • Burgos, J.E. (1999). Seleccionismo: Hacia una síntesis de lo biológico y lo psicológico. Acta Comportamentalia, 7, 67-97
  • Bush, K.M., Sidman, M. y de Rose, T., (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
  • Caracuel, J.C. y Pérez Córdoba, E., (1993). Aprendizaje y procesos cognitivos: un análisis conceptual. En J.I. Navarro (Dir.), Aprendizaje y memoria humana (pp. 407-439). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Carpentier, F., Smeets, P.M. y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: implications for equivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351-370.
  • Catania, A.C. y Cerutti, D.T. (1986). Some non verbal properties of verbal behavior. En T. Thompson y M. D. Seller (Eds.), Analisis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 189-12). Hillsdale N.J.: Earlbaum.
  • Catania, A.C., Mathews, B.A. y Shimoff, E. (1990). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior. Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233-248.
  • Catania, A.C. y Harnad, S. (Eds.). (1988). The Selection of Behavior: The Operant Behaviorism of B.F. Skinner: Comments and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Cook, R.G. (2002). The structure of pigeon múltiple-class same-different learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 345-364.
  • D'Amato, M.R., Salmon, D.P., (1984). Cognitive processes in cebus monkeys. En H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever y H.S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 149-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • D'Amato, M.R., Salmon, D.P., Loukas, E. y Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analylis of Behavior, 44, 35-47.
  • de Souza, L. y Leite, M.H. (2002). Variabilidad comportamental produzida por dois esquemas de reforçamento. Acta Comportamentalia, 10, 5-22.
  • Denavy, J.M., Hayes, S.C. y Nelson, R.O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disable children. Journal of the Experimental Analylis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
  • Donahoe, J.W., Burgos, J.E., y Palmer, D.C. (1993). Selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.
  • Donahoe, J.W., Palmer, D.C. y Burgos, J.E. (1997). The S-R issue: its status in behavior analysis and in Donahoe and Palmer’s Learning and complex behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 193-211
  • Donahoe, J.W., y Palmer, D.C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Dougher, M., Perkins, D.R. y Greenway, D. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 63-93.
  • Dugdale, N.A. y Lowe, C.F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D.E. Blackman y H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice. Contributions and controversies. Hove, Inglaterra: Erlbaum.
  • Dugdale, N.A. y Lowe, C.F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of languagetrained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22.
  • Dymond, S. y Barnes, D. (1995). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
  • Edwards, F.M. y Fields, L. (1995). Contextual control of new equivalence classes. Psychological Record, 45, 165-182.
  • Eikeseth, S. y Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in highfunctioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
  • Epstein, R. (1985a). Extinction–induced resurgence: preliminary investigations an possible implications. The Psychological Record, 35, 143- 153.
  • Epstein, R. (1985b). The espontaneus interconnection of three repertoires. The Psychological Record, 35, 131- 141.
  • Epstein, R. (1987). The espontaneus interconnection of four repertoires of behavior in a pigeon (Columba Livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 197-201.
  • Epstein, R. (1990). Generativity theory and creativity. En M.A. Runco y R.S. Alberts (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 116-140). Londres: Sage Publications.
  • García, A. (2000). Discriminación de la propia conducta y emergencia de simetría en palomas. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Sevilla. Sevilla.
  • García, A. (2002). Antecedentes históricos del uso de discriminaciones condicionales en el estudio de la simetría. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 23(2), 123-130.
  • García, A. y Benjumea, S. (1999). Discriminación de la propia conducta y simetría: análisis de los factores implicados. Comunicación presentada en el XI Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Psicología Comparada, Baeza, Jaén.
  • García, A. y Benjumea, S. (2001). Pre-requisitos ontogenéticos para la emergencia de relaciones simétricas. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1(1), 115-135.
  • García, A. y Benjumea, S. (2002). Orígenes, ampliación y aplicaciones de la equivalencia de estímulos. Apuntes de Psicología, 20, 171-186.
  • García, A. y Benjumea, S. (2002). Relaciones bidireccionales en no-humanos. Suma Psicológica, 9, 193-214.
  • García, A., Bohórquez, C., Gómez, J., Gutiérrez, M.T., y Pérez, V. (2001). Ensombrecimiento entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. Suma Psicológica, 8, 251-270.
  • García, A., Gutiérrez, M.T., Bohórquez, C., Pérez, V. y Gómez, J. (2000). Competencia entre relaciones en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. En J.M. López García (Ed.), Primeras Jornadas de Investigación Psicológica (pp. 119-124). Sevilla: Kronos.
  • García, A., Gómez, J., Gutiérrez, M.T. y Puche, A. (2001). Formación y ampliación de clases de equivalencia aplicadas al tratamiento de un niño autista. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27, 649-669.
  • García, A., Gómez, J., Pérez V., Bohórquez, C., y Gutiérrez M.T. (2002). Competencia entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia–equivalencia. Apuntes de Psicología, 20, 205 224.
  • Goldiamond, I. (1964). A research and demonstration procedure in stimulus control, abstraction, and environmental programming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 216.
  • Gómez, S. (2001). Derivación de relaciones de estímulo y comportamiento verbal. Algunos ejemplos de aplicación al contexto clínico. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27, 111-136.
  • Gray, L. (1966). Backward association in pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 4, 333-334.
  • Griffee, K. y Dougher, M.J. (2002). Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 433-447.
  • Gutiérrez, M.T. y Benjumea, S. (2003). Formación de clases funcionales utilizando una tarea de condicionamiento clásico. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 35, 165-174.
  • Guttman, N. y Kalish, H.I. (1956). Discriminability and simulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 79-88.
  • Hayes, S.C. (1989). Rule-Governed Behavior: Cognition, Contingencies and Instructional Control. New York: Plenum press.
  • Hayes, S.C. (1991). A relational control theory for stimulus equivalence. En L.J. Hayes y P.N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  • Hayes, S.C. y Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations require more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-270.
  • Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D. y Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes, S.C., y Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. En S.C. Hayes (Ed), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes, S.C., y Hayes, L.J. (1992). Verbal relations, cognition and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
  • Hayes, S.C. y Wilson, K.G. (1996). Criticisms of relational frame theory: implications for a behavioranalytic account of derived stimulus relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 221-236.
  • Herman, L.M. y Gordon, J.A. (1974). Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 19-26.
  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133-166.
  • Herrnstein, R.J., Loveland, D.H. y Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-301.
  • Hogan, D.E. y Zentall, T.R. (1977). Backward associations in the pigeon. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 3-15.
  • Horne, P.J., y Lowe, C.F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
  • Hunziker, M.H.L., Saldana, R.L. y Neuringer, A. (1996). Behavioral variability in shr and wky rats as a function of rearing environment and reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65( 1), 129-144.
  • Jitsumori, M., Siemman, M., Leer, M. y Delius, J. (2002). A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 397-408.
  • Kendall, S.B. (1983). Test for mediated transfer in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 33, 245-256.
  • Kuno, H., Kitadate, T. e Iwamoto, T. (1994). Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 399-408.
  • Lashley, K.S. y Wade, M. (1946). The pavlovian theory of generalization. Psychological Review, 53, 311-315.
  • Leader, G., Barnes, D., y Smeets, P.M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondenttype training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
  • Lee, V. (2001). Shifting differentiation and its implication for the response concept. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 47-66.
  • Lionello, K. y Urcuioli, P.J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467-496.
  • Lipkens, R., Kop, F.P. y Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409.
  • Luciano, M.C. (1991). Problem solving behavior: an experimental example. Psicothema, 3, 297-317.
  • Luciano, M.C. y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Early verval developmental history and equivalence relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 137-149.
  • Luciano, M.C. y Gómez, S. (2001). Derivación de funciones psicológicas. Psicothema, 13, 700-707.
  • Mackay, H.A. (1991). Conditional stimulus control. In Iversen y Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior. Elsevier Science Publisher BV.
  • Manabe, K., Kawashima, T. y Staddon, J. (1995). Differential vocalization in budgerigars: Towards an experimental analysis of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 111-126.
  • Markham, M.R. y Dougher, M.J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529- 542.
  • Masia, C.L. y Chase, P.N. (1997). Vicarious learning revisited: a contemporary behavior analytic account. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 28, 41-51.
  • McIntire, K.D., Cleary, J. y Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285.
  • Meehan, E.F. (1999). Class-consistent differential reinforcement and stimulus class formation in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 97-115.
  • Millneson, J.R. (1967). Principios de análisis conductual. México: Trillas. Nissen, H.W., Blum, J.S. y Blum, R.A. (1948). Analysis of matching behavior in the chimpanzee. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 41, 62-74.
  • Oden, D.L., Thompson, R.K.R. y Premack, D. (1988). Spontaneus transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglotytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 140-145.
  • Pack, A.A., Herman, L.M. y Roitblat, H.L. (1991). Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus Californianus). Animal Learning and Behavior, 19, 37-48.
  • Page, S. y Neuringer, A. (1985). Variability as an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429-452.
  • Pérez-Acosta, A.M., Benjumea, S. y Navarro, J.I. (2001). Autoconciencia animal: estudios sobre la autodiscriminación condicional en varias especies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 33, 311-327.
  • Pérez-González, L.A. (1994). Transfer of relational stimulus control in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 487-503.
  • Rehfeldt, R.A., Clayton, M. y Hayes, L.J. (1998). Blocking the formation of 5-member equivalence classes using complex samples. Revista Mexicana de Análisis del Comportamiento, 24, 279-292.
  • Rehfeldt, R.A., Dixon, M.D., Hayes, L.J. y Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647-664.
  • Reichmuth, C. y Schusterman, R.J. (2002). Sea lions and equivalence: Expanding classes by exclusión. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 449-466.
  • Richards, R.W. (1988). The question of bidirectional associations in pigeons’ learning of conditional discrimination tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 577-579.
  • Richelle, M. (1992). La analogía evolucionista en el pensamiento de B. F. Skinner. En J. Gil RoalesNieto, M.C. Luciano y M. Pérez Álvarez (Eds.). Vigencia de la obra de Skinner (pp. 115-124). Granada: SPUG.
  • Rodewald, H.K. (1974). Symbolic matching to sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34, 987- 990.
  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. NewYork: Barnes & Noble. Sahan, T. y Chase, P. (2002). Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability. Behavior Analyst, 25, 175-190.
  • Saunders, K.J. (1989). Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 379-384.
  • Schusterman, R.J. y Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalopbus californianuus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
  • Schusterman, R.J. y Kastak, D. (1998). Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactions. Animal Behavior, 55, 1087-1095.
  • Segal, E.F. (1972). Induction and the provenance of operants. In R.M. Gillbert y J.L. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: behavioral analogy (pp. 1-34). Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
  • Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson y M.D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
  • Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunninghan, S., Tailby, W. y Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
  • Sidman, M. y Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample. An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
  • Sidman, M., Willson-Morris, M. y Kirk, B., (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1-19.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1935). Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo type. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 66-77.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Skinner, B.F. (1972). Conferencia que se ocupa de “tener” un poema. En B.F.
  • Skinner (Ed.), Registro acumulativo (pp. 386-398). Barcelona: Fontanella.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1974). About Behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501-504. Smeets, P.M., Barnes, D. y Roche, B. (1997). Functional equivalence in children: derived stimulusresponse and stimulus-stimulus relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 1-17.
  • Smeets, P.M., Leader, G. y Barnes, D. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondenttype training procedure. Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
  • Staddon, J.E. y Simmelhag, V.L. (1971). El experimento de la superstición: un examen de sus implicaciones para el comportamiento adaptativo (pp. 148-161). En Rachlin, H. (Ed.), Comportamiento y Aprendizaje. Barcelona: Omega.
  • Steele, D.L. y Hayes, S.C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
  • Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. y Smeets, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: a possible model of analogical reasoning. The psychological Record, 51, 381-408.
  • Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. y Smeets, P. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375-936.
  • Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A. y Remington, B. (1996). Naming, the formation of stimulus classes, and applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 409-431.
  • Stromer, R. y Stromer, J.B (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51-66.
  • Stromer, R. y Stromer, J.B. (1990b). Matching to complex: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505-516.
  • Tomonaga, M., Matsuzawa, T., Fujita, K. y Yamamoto, J. (1991). Emergence of symmetry in a visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees. (Pan troglodytes). Psychological Reports, 68, 51- 60.
  • Valero, L. y Luciano, M.C. (1992). Relaciones de equivalencia: una síntesis teórica de los datos empíricos a nivel básico y aplicado. Psicothema, 4, 413-428.
  • Valero, L. y Luciano, M.C. (1993). Relaciones de equivalencia: un estudio de replicación del efecto de la relación simétrica sobre la transitiva. Apuntes de Psicología, 37, 25-40.
  • Vaughan, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36-42.
  • Wright, A.A., Cook, R.G., Rivera, J.J., Sands, S.F. y Delius, J.D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 436-444.
  • Wasserman, E.A., Deder, C.L. y Coppage, D.J., (1992). Non-similarity-based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychological Science, 3, 347-379.
  • Zentall, T.R. (1996). An analysis of stimulus class formation in animals. In T.R. Zentall y P.M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals, (pp. 31-55). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Zentall, T.R. y Hogan, D.E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to the transfer stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 177-186.
  • Zentall, T.R. y Smeets, P.M. (1996). Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet