Failure to find symmetry in pigeons after multiple exemplar training

  1. Gómez Bujedo, Jesús
  2. García García, Andrés
  3. Pérez Fernández, Vicente J.
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 26

Issue: 4

Pages: 435-441

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: An experiment with pigeons was conducted for 46 months in order to test the multiple-exemplar training (MET) hypothesis of symmetry derivation. According to this hypothesis, symmetry is progressively derived after an extensive training of multiple examples of direct and inverse relations among arbitrary stimuli. Method: Four pigeons were given extensive training in direct (e.g., A1-B1; A2-B2) and inverse (e.g., B1-A1; B2-A2) arbitrary conditional discriminations. Once pigeons learned a complete reversal (e.g., AB and BA), a new reversal with different stimuli was trained (e.g., CD and DC, etc.). Subjects were assigned to two different stimulus sets, and sample-comparison order was counterbalanced. Results: Pigeons learned between 4 and 24 conditional discriminations, but none showed evidence of symmetry. Discriminability of samples and comparisons was identified as an important factor because it affected direct and inverse discriminations differently. Conclusions: Despite the negative results reported, this study provides some insights that might help to improve current research on MET and symmetry: We describe some lessons learned about the design of long-term experiments involving a high number of stimuli and finally, we discuss some control strategies for stimulus discriminability that might also contribute to facilitate symmetry derivation in pigeons

Bibliographic References

  • Boelens, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. Psychological Record, 44(4), 587-605.
  • Carter, D.E., & Eckerman, D.A. (1975). Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science, 187(4177), 662-664.
  • Carter, D.E., & Werner, T.J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29(3), 565-601.
  • Chase, S., Schupak, C., & Ploog, B.O. (2012). Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons. Behavioral Processes, 89(3), 225-231.
  • Frank, A.J., & Wasserman, E.A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(2), 147-165.
  • García, A., & Benjumea, S. (2006). The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as proprioceptive samples in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86(1), 65-80.
  • Gibbs, D., Barnes, E., & Cox, J. (2001). Pigeons and Doves, A Guide to Pigeons and Doves of the World. Sussex: Pica Press.
  • Gómez, J. (2009). La simetría como operante generalizada: propiedades de las clases de equivalencia y teoría de los ejemplares. UNED, Madrid.
  • Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Hayes, S.C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  • Hearst, E. (1989). Backward associations: Differential learning about stimuli that follow the presence versus the absence of food in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17(3), 280-290.
  • Heinemann, E.G. (1983). The presolution period and the detection of statistical associations. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein & A.R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. IV, pp. 21-36). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Honig, W.K. (1962). Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 239-248.
  • Honig, W.K., & Urcuioli, P.J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36(3), 405-445.
  • Horne, P.J., & Lowe, C.F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185.
  • Lionello-DeNolf, K.M. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning & Behavior, 37(2), 188-203.
  • Lionello, K.M., & Urcuioli, P.J. (1998). Control by sample location in pigeons’ matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70(3), 235-251.
  • Lipkens, R., Kop, P.F., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49(3), 395-409.
  • Lowe, C.F., & Horne, P.J. (1996). Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 315.
  • Luciano, C., Becerra, I.G., & Valverde, M.R. (2007). The role of multipleexemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 349-365.
  • Meehan, E.F. (1999). Class-consistent differential reinforcement and stimulus class formation in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72(1), 97-115.
  • Rodewald, H.K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34(3), 987-990.
  • Saunders, R.R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of trainingstructure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72(1), 117-137.
  • Schusterman, R.J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychological Record, 43(4), 823-839.
  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5-22.
  • Velasco, S.M., Huziwara, E.M., Machado, A., & Tomanari, G.Y. (2010). Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94(3), 283-295.
  • Yamazaki, Y. (2004). Logical and illogical behavior in animals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46(3), 195-206.
  • Zentall, T.R., Sherburne, L.M., & Steirn, J.N. (1992). Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20(3), 199-206.
Data source: Dialnet