Digital inclusion of businesswomen and women entrepreneurs through social networks in the informal environment

  1. Gutiérrez-Esteban, Prudencia 1
  2. Rodríguez-Miranda, Francisco de Paula 2
  3. Cubo-Delgado, Sixto 1
  4. Hernández-Rincón, María Lourdes 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

  2. 2 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

Journal:
Géneros

ISSN: 2014-3613

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: GÉNEROS. MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF GENDER STUDIES. OCTOBER

Volume: 10

Issue: 3

Pages: 201-232

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17583/GENEROS.7146 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Géneros

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 1 (30-01-2024)
  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 1 (18-02-2024)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 1 (17-02-2024)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2021
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.218
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Gender Studies Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 95/170
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 984/1441

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2021
  • Journal Impact: 0.230
  • Field: ESTUDIOS DE GÉNERO Quartile: C2 Rank in field: 9/25

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2021
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 1.1
  • Area: Gender Studies Percentile: 54
  • Area: Education Percentile: 37

Dimensions

(Data updated as of 17-02-2024)
  • Total citations: 1
  • Recent citations (2 years): 1
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 0.81

Abstract

With the diffusion of Web 2.0, opportunities for collaboration, participation and training in the professional environment have widened. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of family set-up on the use of social networks by entrepreneurial women and businesswomen.Epistemologically, the study is based on the logical positivism and the hypothetical-deductive method. From a methodological point of view, this research is quantitative and presents a descriptive design.The participants in the study are woman from Extremadura and Andalucia (Spain), 477 entrepreneurs and 126 businesswomen. The forms of use of social networks by businesswomen and women entrepreneurs varies according to age-group. However, the age does not appear to have any impact on the places where social networks are used.The results lead us to believe that, in order to attain equality in the domain of digital inclusion, it is necessary to set up formal digital training to increase their digital presence and participation.

Funding information

We wish to thank all anonymous women’s participating in the study both the Andalusian Women’s Institute and the Association of Popular Universities of Extremadura. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Spanish State Plan of Technical and Scientific Research Innovation, 2013-2016 (EDU-2013-45134-P).

Funders

    • EDU-2013-45134-P

Bibliographic References

  • Alozie, N. O. & Akpan-Obong, P. (2017). The digital gender divide: Confronting obstacles to women's development in
  • Africa. Development Policy Review, 35(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12204
  • Area, M. & Pessoa, T. (2012). From Solid to Liquid: New Literacies to the Cultural Changes of Web 2.0. Comunicar, 19(38), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-01
  • Bettio, F., Plantenga, J. & Smith, M. (Eds) (2013). Gender and the European labour market. Oxon, Routledge.
  • Bosma, N. & Kelley, D. (2019). 2018/19 Global Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49480
  • Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 105, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
  • Caroleo, F. E., Ciociano, E., & Destefanis, S. (2017). Youth labour-market performance, institutions and VET systems: a cross-country analysis. Italian Economic Journal, 3(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-016-0045-8
  • Charles, M. & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American journal of sociology, 114(4), 924-976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942
  • Cheng, C-C. & Huang, K-H. (2016). Stereotypes and technology education: different perceptions of computer career among elementary school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 271-283. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=1211237
  • Cornwall, A. & Rivas, A. (2015). From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1013341
  • Cotton, S. R., Anderson, W. A. & Tufekci, Z. (2009). Old wine in a new technology, or a different type of digital divide?. New Media and Society, 11(7), 1163-1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342056
  • Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F. & Ajjan, H. (2019). Empowering women micro-entrepreneurs in emerging economies: The role of information communications technology. Journal of Business Research, 98, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.045
  • Cubo, S., Martin, B. & Ramos, J. L. (2011). Métodos de investigación y análisis de datos en Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud. Madrid, Ediciones Pirámide.
  • Del Moral-Espín, L. & Pais, I. (2018). Feminization of labour, defeminization of time banks: Digital time banking and unpaid virtual work. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 14(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.1.55_1
  • Dhalokia, R. R., Dhalokia, N. & Pedersen, B. (1994). Putting a Byte in the Gender Gap. American Demographics, 16, 20-21.
  • Durán, M. A. (2010). Tiempo de vida y tiempo de trabajo. Bilbao, Fundación BBVA.
  • Durndell, A. & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7
  • English, R. & Johns, R. (Eds) (2016). Gender Considerations in Online Consumption Behavior and Internet Use. Hershey, IBI Global.
  • Eurostat (2019). Harmonised unemployment rate by sex. Eurostat Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=teilm020&language=en
  • Finn, K. (2017). Relational transitions, emotional decisions: new directions for theorising graduate employment. Journal of Education and Work, 30(19), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2016.1239348
  • Gobierno de España (2013). Agenda digital para España. http://www.agendadigital.gob.es/agenda-digital/Paginas/agenda-digital.aspx
  • Gray, T. J., Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2017). Gender and the digital divide in Latinamerica. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12270
  • Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. & Luengo-González, M. R. (2011). Transition to the labour market of women teachers at the University of Extremadura, Feministische Studien, 29(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2011-0109
  • Haraway, D. (1985). A Manifesto for Ciborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 15(2), 65-108.
  • Hargittai, E. (2015). Is bigger always better? Potential biases of big data derived from social network sites. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570866
  • Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers and Education, 118, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011
  • He, T. & Li, S. (2019). A comparative study of digital informal learning: The effects of digital competence and technology expectancy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1744-1758. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12778
  • Indrupati, J. & Henari, T. (2012). Entrepreneurial success, using online social networking: evaluation. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981211225853
  • Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y, Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008
  • Jiménez, R., Rebollo, Á., & García, R. (coords.) (2016). Aprendizaje con TIC para la inclusión digital. Las mujeres como tejedoras de las redes sociales. Madrid, Editorial Síntesis.
  • Leach, L. & Turner, S. (2015). Computer users do gender: the co-production of gender and communications technology. Sage Open, 5(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015604693
  • Lim, V. K. G. & Teo, T. S. H. (1996). Gender differences in occupational stress and coping strategies among IT personnel. Women in Management Review, 11(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429610109299
  • Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
  • Martínez-Cantos, J. L. & Castaño, C. (2017). La brecha digital de género y la escasez de mujeres en las profesiones TIC. Panorama Social, 25, 49- 65.
  • Martínez-García, J. S. (2007). Clase social, género y desigualdad de oportunidades educativas. Revista de Educación, 342, 287-306. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/68976
  • Martínez-Pastor, J. I. (2017). Employability of higher education graduates in Spain: crisis and new challenges. Forum Sociológico, 31, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologico.1829
  • Mercier, E. M., Barron, B., & O'Connor, K. M. (2006). Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00182.x
  • Mumporeze, N. & Prieler, M. (2017). Gender digital divide in Rwanda: A qualitative analysis of socioeconomic factors. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1285-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.014
  • Nurhaeni, I. D., Yuliarti, M. S., & Nugroho, R. A. (2017). Measuring gender diferences in Information system use: case study of e-government. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1746(1), 20068.1-20068.7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953993
  • O’Neill, A., & O’Gorman, B. (2020). Academic support for female entrepreneurs: the positive lasting effects of learning networks”, in Smith, H. L., Etzkowitz, H., & Poulovassilis, A., Gender, Science and Innovation. New Perspectives. (pp. 146–167). Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Orser, B., Riding, A., & Li, Y. (2019). Technology adoption and gender-inclusive entrepreneurship education and training. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 273-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0026
  • Padilla-Carmona, M.T., Suarez-Ortega, M., & Sánchez-García, M. F. (2016). Digital inclusion of mature students: analysis of their attitudes and ICT competences. Revista Complutense de Educación, 27(3), 1229-1246. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/49756
  • Pechtelidis, Y., Kosma, Y., & Chronaki, A. (2015). Between a rock and a hard place: women and computer technology. Gender and Education, 22(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1008421
  • Peña-Legazkue, I., Guerrero, M., González-Pernía, J. L., and Montero, J. (2019). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Informe GEM España 2018-2019. Santander, Editorial de la Universidad de Cantabria. http://www.gem-spain.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GEM2018-2019.pdf
  • Plant, S. (1997). Zeros and Ones: Digital Women and the New Technoculture. London, Fourth Estate.
  • Ragnedda, M. & Muschert, G.W. (Eds) (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Oxford, Routledge.
  • Rashid, A. T. (2016). Digital inclusion and social inequality: gender differences in ICT access and use in five developing countries. Gender, Technology & Development, 20(3), 306-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852416660651
  • Rebollo, A., Vico, A. & García-Pérez, R. (2015). El aprendizaje de las mujeres de las redes sociales y su incidencia en la competencia digital. Prisma Social, 15, 122-146. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/43721
  • Rebollo, M. & Vico, A. (2014). Perceived Social Support as a Factor of Rural Women’s Digital Inclusion in Online Social Networks. Comunicar, 21(43), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-17
  • Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M.J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information Communication and Society, 18(5), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
  • Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace. Melbourne, Spinifex.
  • Suwana, F. &Lily (2017). Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.004
  • Tellhed, U., Backstrom, M., & Bjorklund, F. (2017). Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEMa and HEED Majors. Sex Roles, 77(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y
  • Thompson, R. (2019). Education, Inequality and Social Class: Expansion and Stratification in Educational Opportunity. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315141749
  • Tømte, C. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2011). Gender-differences in self-efficacy ICT related to various ICT-user profiles in Finland and Norway. How do self-efficacy, gender and ICT-user profiles relate to findings from PISA 2006. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1416-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.011
  • Vial, V. & Richomme-Huet, K. (2017). Women entrepreneurs in France. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 30(1), 80-109. DOI: 10.1504/IJESB.2017.081034
  • Vitores, A. & Gil-Juárez, A. (2016). The trouble with “women in computing”: a critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 666-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309
  • Wasserman, I. M. & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252-270. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42956060
  • Werner, A. & Lundberg, A. (2018). Gender jobs: Dilemmas of Gender Studies education and employability in Sweden. European Journal of Women's Studies, 25(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816671162
  • World Economic Forum (WEF) (2018). Global Gender Gap Report 2018. Geneva, WEF. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf