¿Influyen los rasgos de personalidad y el método docente empleado en la percepción del rendimiento académico del alumnado universitario?

  1. Navarro Abal, Yolanda
Journal:
Qurriculum: Revista de Teoría, Investigación y Práctica Educativa

ISSN: 1130-5371

Year of publication: 2009

Issue: 22

Pages: 189-206

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

More publications in: Qurriculum: Revista de Teoría, Investigación y Práctica Educativa

Abstract

This work shows the results of a research whose general aim is to analyze the possible existing correlations between teaching methodology applied in the classroom, the perception of academic performance and personality traits of the participants. The sample is formed by 202 students of both sexes from different degrees in the University of Huelva. For Two instruments of evaluation are used in order to carry out the research: the «Questionnaire on the perception of the efficiency in the academic performance of the three basic teaching methods for the development of professional competence» (created for the accomplishment of this investigation) and the «Revised Inventory of Personality NEO (NEO PI-R)» (Costa and Mccrae, 1999). The results show positive correlations between the perception of academic performance and the teaching methdology of teamwork, as well as between the perception of academic performance and the dimensions of personality of Amiability and Responsibility. Finally, also it is interesting to point out the existing relation between the different teaching methods and the features of personality.

Bibliographic References

  • BLICKLE, G. (1996). «Personality traits, learning strategies, and performance. European Journal of Personality, 10, 337-352.
  • BUSATO, V.V., PRINS, F.J., ELSHOUT, J.J. y HAMAKER, C. (1999). «The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education». Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129-140.
  • BROWN, G. y ATKINS, M. (1988): Effective teaching in Higher Education. Londres: Routledge.
  • COSTA, P.T. y MCCRAE, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO FiveFactor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • COSTA, P.T. y MCCRAE, R.R. (1999). Manual técnico del NEO-PI-R. Madrid: TEA.
  • DIGMAN, J. (1990). «Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model». Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
  • DRUCKER, P.F. (1999). «Managing Oneself». Harvard Business Review, 77, 65-74.
  • FERNÁNDEZ MARCH, A. (2005): Nuevas metologías docentes. Valencia: Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación.
  • GOLDBERG, L.R. (1993). «The structure of phenotypic personality traits». American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
  • JOHN, O.P. (1990). «The Big Five factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaire». En L.A. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (pp. 66-100). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
  • JOHN, O.P., CASPI, A., ROBINS, R.W., MOFFITT, T.E., STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, M. (1994). «The ‘Little Five’: exploring the nomological network of the Five-Factor Model of personality in adolescent boys». Child Development, 65, 160-178.
  • LÓPEZ LÓPEZ, M.J. (2003) Proyecto Docente. Huelva: Universidad de Huelva.
  • ORTET, G., IBÁÑEZ, M.I., RUIPÉREZ, M.A., SÁNCHEZ, A. y ESCRIVÁ, P. (2003). «Construction of a junior version of the NEO PI-R (NEO PIR-RJ): first results about its factor structure. 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences. Austria.
  • PAUNONEN, H.V. (2003). «Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84 (2), 411-24.
  • RUIPÉREZ, M.A., ESCRIVÁ, P., IBÁÑEZ, M.I., HURTADO, F. y ORTET, G. (2003). «Preliminary contributions to the reliability and validity of the Junior NEO PI-R (NEO PI-RJ)». 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences. Graz (Austria).
  • SÁNCHEZ-BERNARDOS, M.L. (1995). «Las cinco dimensiones básicas de la personalidad». En M.D. Avia y M.L. Sánchez-Bernardos (eds.). Personalidad, aspectos cognitivos y sociales. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • TERRACIANO, A. (2003). «The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation». Personality and individual differences, 35, 1859-1872.
  • UNESCO, International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century (1999). Learning: the treasure within: report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Centur.
  • YIK, M.S.M. y RUSSELL, J.A. (2001). «Predicting the big two of affect from the big five of personality». Journal of research in personality, 35, 247-277.
Data source: Dialnet