Development of different spatial frames of reference for orientation in small-scale environments

  1. Moraleda Barreno, Enrique
  2. Broglio, Cristina
  3. Rodríguez Fernández, Fernando
  4. Gómez García, Antonia María
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Any de publicació: 2013

Volum: 25

Número: 4

Pàgines: 468-475

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Psicothema

Resum

Background: Previous studies show that there is a developmental transition in the frames of reference children use to orientate from a body-centered to an allocentric strategy. However, there is no agreement concerning the age at which they begin to integrate and flexibly use both strategies in small-scale environments. Method: 6-10-year-old children and adults were trained to locate a hidden object in an arm-maze placed within a small-scale model, which maintained stable relationships with the frames of reference provided by the experimental room and by the subject (Experiment 1), and in a situation of inconsistency between the frame provided by the small-scale model and the other two (Experiment 2). Results: When the frames of reference provided by the room and by the subject conflict with that of the manipulative space, the performance deteriorates compared to the situation when multiple frames of reference can be used cooperatively to locate the goal. The flexible use of the information provided by the model (i.e., the cues surrounding the maze and the geometrical features) emerged at 10 years. Conclusions: Through development, children acquire new spatial abilities and increasing flexibility in the conjoint use of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference in small-scale environments.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Burgess, N., Jeffery, K.J., & O'Keefe, J. (1999). The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N.S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 1-23.
  • Cimadevilla, J.M., Conejo, N.M., Miranda, R., & Arias, J.L. (2004). Sex differences in the Morris water maze in young rats: Temporal dimensions. Psicothema, 16(4), 611-614.
  • Diamond, A. (1990). Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys and the neural bases of inhibitory control in reaching. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608(1), 637-676.
  • Eichenbaum, H. (2000). A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(1), 41-50.
  • Goldman-Rakic, P.S. (1987). Development of cortical circuitry and cognitive function. Child Development, 58(3), 601-622.
  • Gouteux, S., & Spelke, E. (2001). Children use geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space. Cognition, 81(2), 119-148.
  • Gouteux, S., Vauclair, J., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2001). Reorientation in small-scale environment by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 16(3), 853-869.
  • Hupbach, A., & Nadel, L. (2005). Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module. Cognitive Development, 20(2), 279-302.
  • Learmonth, A.E, Nadel, L., & Newcombe, N. (2002). Children's use of landmarks: Implications for modularity theory. Psychological Science 13(4), 337-341.
  • Lehnung, M., Leplow, B., Ekroll, V., Herzog, A., Mehdorn, M., & Ferstl, R. (2003). The role of locomotion in the acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge in children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 79-86.
  • Lenroot, R.K, & Giedd, J.N. (2006). Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 718-729.
  • Lourenco, S.F., & Huttenlocher, J. (2006). How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks. Cognition, 100(3), 511-529.
  • Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nardini, M., Burgess, N., Breckenridge, K., & Atkinson, J. (2006). Differential developmental trajectories for egocentric, environmental and intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Cognition, 101(1), 153-172.
  • Newcombe, N., & Huttenlocher, J. (2003) Making space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. MIT Press.
  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.
  • Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R., Koppeschaar, H., & Honk, J. (2004). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54(1), 24-34.
  • Salas, C., Broglio, C., & Rodríguez, F. (2003). Evolution of forebrain and spatial cognition in vertebrates: Conservation across diversity. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 62(2), 72-82.
  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270.
  • Wang, R.F., & Spelke, E.S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77(3), 215-250.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet