The influence/impact of Semantic Web technologies on Social Media

  1. Infante-Moro, Alfonso 1
  2. Zavate, Anca 2
  3. Infante-Moro, Juan-Carlos 1
  1. 1 GITICE research group. University of Huelva, Spain.
  2. 2 University Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Iasi, Romania.
Revista:
International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

ISSN: 2387-0184

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 2

Número: 2

Páginas: 18-30

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

Resumen

The paper is based on a literature review of Semantic Web technologies and evaluation of how these technologies can be applied in the Social Media domain, whose purpose is to underline and to understand the way how Semantic Web technologies can influence and improve Social Media, and be relevant to effective searches (for example, for companies and their human resources departments).The Semantic Web technologies allow data collecting about a certain subject from the entire Internet, and Social Media allows people to share information about them, to express their opinion and to influence others. Therefore, participation and collaboration for the selection of useful information from the Web is sought. But we found limitations for success in the high cost of apps that can serve as connecting points for these social networks (Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Twitter, etc.) and in the privacy of the shared content on these social networks.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abarca, A. (2013). Google Authorship, Facebook OpenGraph y Twitter Cards. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://abarcarodriguez.com/blog/google-authorship-facebook-opengraph-y-twitter-cards).
  • Carrodeguas, N. (2012). Como mostrar más contenido en los tweets publicados usando TwitterCard. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://norfipc.com/web/como-mostrar-mas-informacion-tweets-usando-twitter-card.html).
  • Cernea, D. A., Del Moral, E., & Labra, J. E. (2007). SOAF: un sistema de indexado semántico de OA basado en las anotaciones colaborativas. SPDECE 2007.
  • d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Fazzinga, B., Gottlob, G., Lukasiewicz, T., (2010). Combining Semantic Web Search with the Power of Inductive Reasoning.
  • Daedalus (2012). Social Media Analysis. Make the most of what is being said in social media by using semantic technologies. [Accessed on: February 2014]. (http://www.daedalus.es/en/blog-and-resources/webinars/semantic-analysis-social-media/)
  • Esmaili, K., & Abolhassani, H. (2006). A categorization scheme for semantic web search engines.Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on computer systems and applications, Dubai/Sharjah, UAE. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=1618351).
  • Fensel, D., Facca, F., Simperl, E. & Toma, I. (2011). Semantic Web Services, Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York.
  • Finin, T., Ding, L. & Zou, L. (2005). Social Networking on the Semantic Web. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/_file_directory_/papers/160.pdf)
  • Gil, M. (2013). Google Authorship: Cómo aumentar el tráfico orgánico un 30% con Google+. BlueCaribu. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://www.bluecaribu.com/google-authorship-como-aumentar-tu-trafico-un-30-con-google/).
  • González, J., Labra, J. E., & Álvarez, J. M. (2012). A MapReduce Implementation of the Spreading Activation Algorithm for Processing Large Knowledge Bases Based on Semantic Networks. IJKSR, 3(4), 47-56.
  • Gonzalez, R. (2012). Semantic Search And the Semantic Web. [Accessed on March 2014]. (https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/ro/semantic-university/semantic-search-and-the-semantic-web)
  • Gonzalez, R. (2012). What Makes a Good Semantic Web Application?. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/ro/semantic-university/what-makes-a-good-semantic-web-application).
  • Google (2014). Información del autor incluida en los resultados de búsqueda. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1408986?hl=es).
  • Gruber, T. (1993). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. Technical Report KSL-93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, CA.
  • Infante Moro, A., Martínez López, F. J., García Ordaz, M., & Infante Moro, J. C. (2014a). Information exchange in big companies of the Spanish hotel sector: an inside and inter-organizational comparative analysis. TMS Algarve 2014: Management Studies International Conference, 209-220. University of the Algarve, School of Management, Hospitality and Tourism. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2863.4400
  • Infante Moro, A., Martínez López, F. J., García Ordaz, M., & Infante Moro, J. C. (2014b). El teletrabajo en las grandes empresas del sector hotelero: El caso español. Turitec 2014: X congreso nacional turismo y tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones, 309-321. Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Escuela Universitaria de Turismo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3571.2009
  • Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J. C., Martínez-López, F. J., & García-Ordaz, M. (2015). Currícula en SI/TI en las empresas españolas: Estudio longitudinal (2001-2011). Certiuni Journal, (1), 76-85.
  • Infante Moro, A., Martínez López, F. J., & Infante Moro, J. C. (2015). The Extent of Computerization in big companies of the Spanish Hotel Sector. Enlightening tourism. A pathmaking journal.
  • Intefblog (2014). Instituto nacional de tecnologías educativas y formación del profesorado. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. España. [Accessedon: April 2014]. (http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2014/02/11/web-semantica-un-mundo-de-posibilidades/).
  • Iskold, A. (2010). Facebook Open Graph: guíadefinitivaparausuarios. TICBeat. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://www.ticbeat.com/analisis/facebook-open-graph-guia-definitiva-usuarios/).
  • Kerrigan, M., Mocan, A., Simperl, E., Fensel, D. (2009). Modeling Semantic Web Services with the Web Service. Modeling Toolkit. Springer Science+Business Media. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10922-009-9130-8).
  • Klyne, G., & Carroll, J. (2014). Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-design-goals)
  • MacManus, R. (2007). 10 Semantic Apps to Watch. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://readwrite.com/2007/11/28/10_semantic_apps_to_watch#awesm=~oBvnqQ2lTK3HEN).
  • Open Graph protocol (2014). [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://ogp.me/).
  • Peter, M. (2007). Social Networks and the Semantic Web, Springer.Scalable Uncertainty Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6379 (2010), 137-150. [Accessed on: February 2014]. (http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-15951-0_17).
  • Ponce Toste, Y., & Fernández Peña, F. O. (2012). Usuarios inteligentes y la web semántica. RevistaCubana de CienciasInformáticas, 6(1).
  • RDF Working Group (2014). Resource Description Framework (RDF). [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.w3.org/RDF/).
  • Rivero, F. (2011). Hashtag. Herramientas Web 3.0. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://herramientaswebtrespuntocero.blogspot.com.es/p/mecanismos-de-incremento-de.html).
  • Rocafull, D. (2014). TwitterCards para aumentar la visibilidad de tu web en Twitter. WanaTop. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://wanatop.com/twitter-cards-aumentar-visibilidad-web-twitter/).
  • Sánchez, F. (2013). TwitterCards para optimizar tus publicaciones en Twitter. HumanLevel. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://www.humanlevel.com/articulos/redes-sociales-articulos/twitter-cards-para-optimizar-tus-publicaciones-en-twitter.html).
  • Sequeda, J. (2001). Introduction to: RDF. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://semanticweb.com/introduction-to-rdf_b17953).
  • Sequeda, J. (2012). Introduction to: RDF vs XML. [Accessed on: February 2014]. (http://semanticweb.com/introduction-to-rdf-vs-xml_b31071).
  • Studer, S., Benjamins, R., &Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25, 161-197.
  • Tello Lozano, A. (2001). Ontologías en la Web semántica. I Jornadas de Ingeniería Web, 1.
  • Tobin, J. (2009). Semantic Social Media: The Future of Social Networking? A Special Podcast. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.ignitesocialmedia.com/semantic-web/semantic-social-media-the-future-of-social-networking-a-special-podcast/)
  • Twitter Developers (2013). Cards Markup Tag Reference. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (https://dev.twitter.com/docs/cards/markup-reference).
  • Twitter Developers (2014). Twitter Cards. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (https://dev.twitter.com/docs/cards).
  • Uren, V., Lei, Y., Lopez, V., Liu, H., Motta, E., & Giordanino, M. (2007). The usability of semantic search tools: A review. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 22, p. 361-377. [Accessed on: April 2014]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888907001233).
  • Vrandei, D., Passant, A. &Breslin, G. (2011). Social Semantic Web, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.springerreference.com/docs/html/chapterdbid/300528.html).
  • W3C, (2012). Web Ontology Language (OWL). [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL).
  • W3schools, (2014). RDF Rules. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/ws_rdf_rules.asp).
  • Wikipedia (2013). Social Semantic Web. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Semantic_Web)
  • Wikipedia, (2013). SPARWL. [Accessed on: March 2014]. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARQL).
  • Wikipedia (2014). Uniform resource identifier. [Accessed on: February 2014]. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_resource_identifier).
  • Yu, L. (2011). A Developer's Guide to the Semantic Web, Springer, Atlanta.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet