The implied equity duration for the Spanish listed firms

  1. Fullana Samper, Olga
  2. Toscano, David
Journal:
The Spanish Review of Financial Economics

ISSN: 2173-1268

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 12

Issue: 1

Pages: 33-39

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.SRFE.2013.09.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: The Spanish Review of Financial Economics

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 3 (29-01-2024)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 5 (27-12-2023)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2014
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.262
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Finance Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 159/272
  • Area: Economics and Econometrics Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 399/664

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2014
  • Journal Impact: 0.080
  • Field: ECONOMÍA Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 75/161

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2014
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.4
  • Area: Economics and Econometrics Percentile: 17
  • Area: Finance Percentile: 14

Dimensions

(Data updated as of 27-12-2023)
  • Total citations: 5
  • Recent citations (2 years): 0
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 1.72

Funding information

The authors thank comments from the editor, Francisco González, and an anonymous referee of the Spanish Review of Financial Economics, from Juan Nave, and from participants in the XVI Applied Economics Meeting (Granada, 2013), and in the internal seminars at Universidad de Castilla – La Mancha, Universidad de Murcia, Universidad de Valencia, Universidad de Huelva and Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. They also thank financial support from Gobierno de España (MICINN ECO2009-13616 and MEYC ECO2012-36685) and from Banco Santander (Copernicus UCH-CEU 36/12). Appendix A

Bibliographic References

  • Ballester L., Ferrer R., González C. Linear and nonlinear interest rate sensitivity of Spanish banks. Spanish Review of Financial Economics 2011, 9:35-48.
  • Benito S. Un modelo de duración trifactorial. Spanish Review of Financial Economics 2006, 9:26-46.
  • Boquist J.A., Racette G.C., Schlarbaum G.G. Duration and risk assessment for bonds and common stocks. Journal of Finance 1975, 30:1360-1365.
  • Campbell J., Mei J. Where do beta come from? Asset price dynamics and the sources of systematic risk. The Review of Financial Studies 1993, 6:567-592.
  • Campbell J.Y., Polk C., Voulteenaho T. Growth or glamour? Fundamentals and systematic risk in stock returns. Review of Financial Studies 2009, 23(1):305-344.
  • Chen H.J. Firm life expectancy and the heterogeneity of the book-to-market effect. Journal of Financial Economics 2011, 100(2):402-423.
  • Cohen R.D. The relationship between the equity risk premium, duration and dividend yield. Wilmott Magazine 2002, 6:84-97.
  • Cornell B. Risk, duration, and capital budgeting: new evidence on some old questions. Journal of Business 1999, 72:183-200.
  • Da Z. Cash flow, consumption risk, and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance 2009, 64:923-956.
  • Dechow P.M., Sloan R.G., Soliman M.T. Implied equity duration: a new measure of equity risk. Review of Accounting Studies 2004, 9:197-228.
  • Fama E.F., French K.R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 1993, 33:3-55.
  • González M., Nave J.M. Portfolio immunization using independent component analysis. Spanish Review of Financial Economics 2010, 21:37-46.
  • Hamelink F., MacGregor B., Nanthakumaran N., Orr A. A comparison of UK equity and property duration. Journal of Property Research 2002, 19(1):61-80.
  • Hicks J.R. Value and Capital 1939, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Hurley W.J., Johnson L.D. A note on the measurement of duration and convexity. Financial Analysts Journal 1995, (May/June):77-79.
  • Johnson L.D. Equity duration: Another look. Financial Analysts Journal 1989, 45(2):73-75.
  • Leibowitz M. Total portfolio duration: a new perspective on asset allocation. Financial Analysts Journal 1986, 42(5):18-29.
  • Leibowitz M.L., Bova A., Hammond P.B. Real return tents and equity durations. The Endowment Model of Investing: Return, Risk, and Diversification 2010, 213-223. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  • Leibowitz M., Kogelman S. Resolving the equity duration paradox. Financial Analysts Journal 1993, 49(1):51-65.
  • Leibowitz M.L., Sorensen E.H., Arnott R.D., Hanson H.N. A total differential approach to equity duration. Financial Analysts Journal 1989, (September/October):30-37.
  • Lewin R.A., Sardy M.J., Satchell S. UK measures of firm-lived equity duration. International Finance Review 2007, 7:335-347.
  • Lintner J. Corporate Growth Under Uncertainty 1971, The Corporate Economy, MacMillan, London, UK.
  • Livingston M. Duration and risk assessment for bonds and common stocks: a note. Journal of Finance 1978, 33(1):293-295.
  • Macaulay F.R. Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields, and Stock Prices in the United States Since 1856 1938, NBER Books, Cambridge.
  • Nissim D., Penman S.H. Ratio analysis and equity valuation: from research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies 2001, 6:109-154.
  • Penman S.H. An evaluation of accounting rate-of-return. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 1991, 6:233-256.
  • Santa-Clara P. Discussion of implied equity duration: a new measure of equity risk. Review of Accounting Studies 2004, 9(2):229-231.
  • Shaffer S. Equity duration and convexity when firms can fail or stagnate. Finance Research Letters 2007, 4(4):233-241.
  • Stigler G.J. Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing Industries 1963, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.