Of Mutants and Monstersa Posthuman Study of Verhoeven’s and Wiseman’s Total Recall

  1. Beatriz Domínguez-García 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

Revista:
Hélice

ISSN: 1887-2905

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 7

Número: 1

Páginas: 37-51

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hélice

Resumen

The abuse and violence exerted on the posthuman bodies of fiction is born from their resistance to the postulates of the most traditional humanism. The diachronic vision of the figure of the mutant, as a dehumanized and isolated body from the transhumanist perspective, anticipates the debates generated in the 21st century about the survival of hierarchy in the typification of bodies into ‘more or less’ abled. The examples of corporeal alterity are, thus, manifested as a monstrous, mutant image that warns spectators about the dangers of both medical and environmental experiments. In this sense, the analysis of the film Total Recall (Paul Verhoeven, 1990) and its remake (Len Wiseman, 2012), serves as a starting point to offer a critical vision of the abjection caused by the dismantling of the human form, in the words of Manuela Rossini. The critique emerges from Feminist Studies but also from other contemporary schools which also question the hierarchy between bodies such as Queer or Crip Theory. From a posthuman perspective, the presentation of disabled bodies reflects humanity’s propensity for their nullification and, therefore, their capacity to be exploited and discarded

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BAKHTIN, Mikhail (1984, 1965). Rabelais and His World. Translated by Michael Holquist. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
  • BUTLER, Judith (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
  • ELLIS, R. J. (Autumn 1995). “‘Are You a Fucking Mutant?:’ Total Recall’s Fantastic Hesitations”, Foundation, 65: 81-97.
  • CUDD, Anne E. (2006). Analyzing Oppression. New York: OUP.
  • CUDD, Anne E. (2005). “How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35.1: 20-49.
  • CLARKE, Bruce (2016). “The Nonhuman”, Bruce Clarke & Manuela Rossini (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 141-152.
  • FERNÁNDEZ-MENICUCCI, Amaya (2014). “Memories of Future Masculine Identities: A Comparison of Philip K. Dick’s ‘We Can Remember it for you Wholesale,’ the 1990 Film Total Recall and its 2012 Remake”, Between, 4.8: 1-25.
  • FERRANDO, Francesca (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury.
  • FERRANDO, Francesca (2013). “Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations”, Existenz, 8.2: 26-32.
  • GLASS, Fred (1990). “Totally Recalling Arnold: Sex and Violence in the New Bad Future”, Film Quarterly, 44.1: 2-13.
  • KRISTEVA, JULIA (1982) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Columbia University Press, 1982.
  • LANDSBERG, Alison (1995). “Prosthetic Memory: Total Recall and Blade Runner”, Body & Society, 1.3-4: 175-189.
  • MIKLITSCH, Robert (1993). “Total Recall: Production, Revolution, SimulationAlienation Effect”, Camera Obscura 11.2 #32: 4-40.
  • NDALIANIS, A. (2001). “Paul Verhoeven and his Hollow Men”, Screening the Past, 13: 1-17.
  • PALUMBO, Donald (1991). “‘Inspired... by Phillip K. Dick’: Ambiguity, Deception, and Illusion in Total Recall”, Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 4.1 #13: 69-80.
  • ROSSINI, Manuela (2016). “Bodies”, Bruce Clarke & Manuela Rossini (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 153-169.
  • RUTSKY, R. L. (2016). “Technologies”, Bruce Clarke & Manuela Rossini (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 182-195.
  • SAID, Edward (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • SARDAR, Ziauddin (1991). “Total Recall: Aliens, ‘Others’ and Amnesia in Postmodernist Thought”, Futures, 23.2: 189-203.
  • SHAW, Debra Benita (2018). Posthuman Urbanism: Mapping Bodies in Contemporary City Space. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • STEWART, Garrett (2012). “Surveillance Cinema”, Film Quarterly, 66. 2: 5-15.
  • TELOTTE, J.P. (1999). “Verhoeven, Virilio, and ‘Cinematic Derealization’”, Film Quarterly, 53.2: 30-38.
  • TRINDER, Stephen (2020). “Questions of Space in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema”, Open Cultural Studies, 4.1: 1-11, https://doi.org/10. 1515/culture-2020-0001
  • TYBJERG, Casper (10 March 2016). “Refusing the Reality Pill: A Film Studies Perspective on Prosthetic Memory”, Kosmorama, https://www.kosmorama.org/en/kosmorama /artikler/refusing-reality-pill-film-studiesperspective-prosthetic-memory
  • TYLER, Imogen (2013). Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. New York: Zed Books.
  • WILLIAMS, Linda (1991). “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess”, Film Quarterly, 44.4: 2-13.
  • WOOD, Robert E. (1997). “Remembering the Body: Ideological Ambivalence in Total Recall”, Studies in the Humanities, 24.1: 33-42.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet