Cuestionario TPACK para docentes de Educación Física

  1. Laura Ladrón-de-Guevara 1
  2. Bartolomé J. Almagro 2
  3. Julio Cabero- Almenara 3
  1. 1 Centro de Estudios Universitarios Cardenal Spínola CEU, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Huelva, España
  3. 3 Universidad de Sevilla, España
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Alea: 10

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 173-183

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Campus Virtuales

Laburpena

One of the most used models to measure the incorporated the new technologies in the education is, the technological pedagogical content Knowledge (TPACK). So, the objective of this study was to analyze the psychometrics propriety of the Spanish version of the TPACK questionnaire to Physical Education teachers. Was administrated to a sample of 324 university teachers. A confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, temporal stability and the bivariate correlations were perform. The results showed that the model with four factors model was the best settings presented. The technological knowledge (TK) and the knowledge about the application of the technology (TCK+TPK+TPACK), correlated in a positive form and statistically significant with the self-efficacy in the use of the computers of the teachers. The results indicate that the TPACK questionnaire tested in this study is an appropriate tool to assessment the TPACK in Physical Education teachers.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • American Psychological Association (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edn. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000165-000.
  • Archambault, L.; Crippen, K (2009). Examining TPACK Among K-12 online distance Educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88. (https://bit.ly/2CclAhp).
  • Archambault, L. M.; barnett. J. h. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPCK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
  • Baert, H.; Stewart, A. (2014). The Effects of Role Modeling on Technology Integration within Physical Education Teacher Education. JTRM in Kinesiology. (https://bit.ly/2ZbowI0).
  • Brantley-Dias, L.; Ertmer, P. A. (2014). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the Construct “Just Right?”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103-128. doi:10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615.
  • Burgoyne, N.; Graham, C. R.; Sudweeks, R. (2010). The validation of an instrument measuring TPACK. In d. gibson & b. dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3787-3794).
  • Cabero-Almenara, J. (2014). La formación del profesorado en TIC: Modelo TPACK conocimiento tecnológico, pedagógico y de contenido). Secretariado de Recursos Audiovisuales y nuevas Tecnologías de la Universidad de Sevilla.
  • Cabero-Almenara, J.; barroso, J. (2016). formación del profesorado en TIC: una visión del modelo TPACK. Cultura y Educación, 28(3), 633-663. doi:10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526.
  • Chai, C. S.; Koh, J. H. L.; Tsai, C. C. (2010). facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. (https://bit.ly/2ZEebQ3).
  • Chai, C. S.; Koh, J. h. L.; Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595-603. (http://bit.ly/2sLTthv).
  • Cheung, G. W.; Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • Durán-García, M. E.; Durán-Aponte, E. E. (2013). Concepts of heat and work in an electronic forum. Effects of computer self-efficacy. Educación Química, 24(2), 247-254. doi:10.1016/S0187-893X(13)72469-8.H
  • Harris, J.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological Pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculumbased technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
  • Howard, M. C. (2014). Creation of a computer self-efficacy measure: Analysis of internal consistency, psychometric properties, and validity. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and Social networking, 17(10), 677-681. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0255.
  • Hu, L. T.; Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. h. hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 76-99). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jöreskog, K. G.; Sörbom, d. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Koh, J. H. L.; Chai, C. S.; Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore preservice teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 563-573. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x.
  • Liang, J. C.; Chai, C. S.; Koh, J. H. L.; yang, C. J.; Tsai, C. C. (2013). Surveying in-service preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 581-594. doi:10.14742/ajet.299.
  • Marcelo, C.; Yot, C.; Mayor, C. (2015). Enseñar con tecnologías digitales en la Universidad. [University Teaching with digital Technologies]. Comunicar, 45, 117-124. doi:10.3916/C45-2015-12.
  • Mercader, C.; Gaidín, J. (2020). University teachers' perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: the importance of the academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in higher Education, 17, 4. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x.
  • Mishra, P.; Koehler, J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. (http://bit.ly/2l4Rron).
  • Montero, I.; León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. (http://bit.ly/2MfUPt1).
  • Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers in developing TPCK. In AACTE (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 223-250). New York: Routledge.
  • Rebollo-Catalán, A.; Vico-Bosch, A.; García-Pérez, R. (2015). El aprendizaje de las mujeres de las redes sociales y su incidencia en la competencia digital. Revista Prisma Social, 15, 122-146. (https://bit.ly/31nxAkw).
  • Roig-Vila, R.; Mengual-Andrés, S.; Quinto-Medrano, P. (2015). Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares del profesorado de Primaria. [Primary Teachers’ Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge]. Comunicar, 45, 151-159. doi:10.3916/C45-2015-16.
  • Satorra, A.; Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. doi:10.1007/bf02296192.
  • Schmidt, D. A.; Baran, E.; Thompson, A. D.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. J.; Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.
  • Semiz, K.; Ince, M. L. (2011). Adaptation and validation of teachers’ knowledge of teaching and technology, technology integration selfefficacy and outcome expectations questionnaires for preservice PE teachers. In 16th Annual ECSS Congress book of Abstracts, 49, Liverpool, England.
  • Semiz, K.; Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers´ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248-1265. doi:10.14742/ajet.800.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. doi:10.2307/1175860.
  • Sola, T.; Nniya, M.; Moreno, A.; Romero, J. J. (2017). Valoración del profesorado de educación secundaria de la ciudad de Tetuán sobre la formación en TIC desarrollada desde el Ministerio de Educación nacional. Píxel-bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 49-63. doi:10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.03.
  • Suárez, J.; Almerich, G.; Gargallo, B.; Aliaga, F. (2013). Las competencias del profesorado en TIC: estructura básica. Educación XX1, 16(1), 39-62. doi:10.5944/educxx1.16.1.716.
  • Torres-Díaz, J. C.; Infante-Moro, A. (2011). Digital divide in universities: Internet use in Ecuadorian universities. Comunicar, 19(37), 81-88.
  • Valdivieso, T.; Gonzáles, M. A. (2016). Competencia digital docente: ¿dónde estamos? Perfil del docente de educación primaria y secundaria. El caso de Ecuador. Píxel-bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 57-73. doi:10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i49.04.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet