Prácticas de liderazgo escolar en Andalucía moderadas por dimensión organizativa

  1. José L. del barrio-Saucedo 1
  2. Ramón Tirado-Morueta 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva, España
Journal:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 12

Issue: 1

Pages: 21-34

Type: Article

DOI: 10.54988/CV.2023.1.1310 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Campus Virtuales

Abstract

The role of organizational leadership in driving innovative processes that respond to the challenges to our global and society is widely acknowledged. The Ontario Leadership Framework (OLF) is a comprehensive approach that provides leadership practices adaptable to changes. Nonetheless, given the heterogeneous results arising from the framework according to different educational establishments, it is necessary the conduct of studies that show the framework performance in a controlled organizational context. This study sought to comprehend the relationships among OLF components as a worthy structure to develop good teaching practices while controlling the type of educational establishment; effect, a sample of representatives from Andalusian School Leadership Teams was examined. Multigroup structural equation modelling was performed considering. Consequently, it was ascertained that the organizational dimension influences the structure of the relationships of the model. This study provides empirical evidence that might prove valuable for the development of the model in different schools.

Bibliographic References

  • Ali, A.; Wang, H.; Bodla, A. A.; Bahadur, W. (2021). A moderated mediation model linking transactive memory system and social media with shared leadership and team innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 625-637. doi:10.1111/sjop.12733.
  • Amels, J.; Krüger, M. L.; Suhre, C. J.; Van Veen, K. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership and inquiry-based work on primary teachers’ capacity to change: testing a model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 468-485. doi:10.1080/09243453.2020.1746363.
  • Boltz, L.; Yadav, A.; Dillman, B.; Robertson, C. (2021). Transitioning to remote learning: Lessons from supporting K-12 teachers through a MOOC. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52 (4), 1377-1393. doi:10.1111/bjet.13075.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York (USA): routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203807644.
  • Cheung, G. W.; Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • Chochabot, J. M.; Becerra, M. M. V. (2021). Liderazgo directivo y su impacto en la gestión centrada en los aprendizajes. Revista Científica Epistemia, 5(1). doi:10.26495/re.v5i1.1890.
  • Curran, P. J.; West, S. G.; Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16-29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.
  • Eurostat. (2022). Early leavers from education and training by sex and NUTS 2 regions, consulted 17 de November.
  • Gairín, J.; Tafur, R.; Vázquez, M. (2017). Advances and Challenges of Educational Leadership in Latin America - Introduction - The Current State of Management and Leadership in Latin America: Educational Models in Transition. In D. Waite y I. Bogotch (Eds.) (pp. 349–352). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118956717.ch22.
  • Galdames, S.; Guihen, L. (2022) Millennials and leadership: a systematic literature review,Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33:1-2, 146-162. doi:10.1080/14783363.2020.1812380.
  • Hair, E.; Halle, T.; Terry-Humen, E.; Lavelle, B.; Calkins, J. (2006). Children's school readiness in the ECLS-K: Predictions to academic, health, and social outcomes in first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 431-454. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.005.
  • Hallinger, P.; Heck, R. H. (2011). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 469-485). Springer, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_27.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London (UK) Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203887332.
  • Heifetz, R. A.; Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard business review, 75, 124-134.
  • Hitt D. H.; Tucker P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement. Review of Educational Research, (86), 531-569. doi:10.3102/0034654315614911.
  • Kramer, M.; Crespy, D. (2011). Communicating collaborative leadership, Leadership Quarterly, 22, 5, 1024-1037. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.021.
  • Leithwood K. (2012). The Ontario Leadership Framework 2012 with a discussion of the research foundations. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Institute for Educational Leadership and the Ontario Ministry of Education. (bit.ly/3hqSIqO0).
  • Leithwood, K.; Harris, A. ; Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited, 40(1), 5-22. doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.
  • Leithwood, K.; Sun, J.; Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570-599. doi:10.1177/0013161X19878772.
  • Leithwood, K.; Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving: Evidence from school and district leaders. New York (USA) Suny Press.
  • Louis, K. ; Kruse, S. (1998). Creating community in reform: Images of organizational learning in inner-city schools. In K. Leithwood & K.S. Louis (Eds.). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 17-45). doi:10.1201/9781003077459-3.
  • Louis, K.; Dretzke, B; Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3),315-336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586.
  • Moreno-Guerrero, A.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, C.; Gómez-García, G.; Ramos Navas-Parejo. M. (2020). Educational innovation in higher education: Use of role playing and educational video in future teachers’ training. Sustainability, 12(6), 2558. doi:10.3390/su12062558.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE) (Octubre, 2022). Panorama de educación 2022.(https://oecdtv.webtvsolution.com/d6508609bfc34071e9c334c3e08a305d/en/launch_of_education_at_a_glance_2022.html).
  • Sotomayor Soloaga, P.; Muñoz Hormazábal, J.; Martínez Maldonado, P.; Araya Cortés, A. (2020). Liderazgo, cultura y prácticas inclusivas desde la mirada de equipos directivos de establecimientos educativos. Comunicación, 11(1),5-15. doi:10.33595/2226-1478.11.1.375.
  • Tian, M.; Risku, M.; Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44 (1), 146-164. doi:10.1177/1741143214558576.
  • Torres, E. (2018). La relevancia del docente en la educación centrada en el estudiante. Voces de la Educación, 3(5), 215-222. doi:10.4067/s0718-45652011000100011.
  • Waters, T.; Marzano, R. J.; McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on pupil achievement. A working paper. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (bit.ly/3YnpoCd0).
  • Yáñez-Galleguillos, L. M.; Soria-Barreto, K. (2017). Reflexión de BPD docentes como eje de calidad en la educación universitaria: caso Escuela de Ciencias Empresariales de la Universidad Católica del Norte. Formación universitaria, 10(5), 59-68. doi:10.4067/s0718-50062017000500007.
Data source: Dialnet