La implementación de un simulador de negocios en el Máster de Turismo de la Universidad de Huelva

  1. Juan C. Infante-Moro 1
  2. Alfonso Infante-Moro 1
  3. Julia Gallardo-Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva, España.
Revista:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Ano de publicación: 2023

Volume: 12

Número: 1

Páxinas: 173-180

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.54988/CV.2023.1.1335 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Campus Virtuales

Resumo

A hotel management simulator has recently been implemented in the Tourism Master of the University of Huelva. This implementation process was carried out by three professors who teach in the master's degree, and through the analysis of this implementation it was intended to detect which were the factors that were most relevant when deciding and carrying out the implementation. For this, a causal study was carried out through fuzzy cognitive maps and the results obtained were analyzed with the FCMappers software, which allowed to point out the factors "quality management" and "perceived usefulness" as the two most relevant factors to the time to decide and carry out the implementation of the simulator.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acquisti, A.; Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In International workshop on privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 36-58). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11957454_3.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Alenizi, M. A. K. (2022). The impact of training for IoT technology awareness program In the Saudi Arabian Universities. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (17), 45-58. doi:10.46661/ijeri.4914.
  • Álvarez-Rodríguez, F. J.; Vera, R. A. A. (2022). Assessment of Digital Graduation Competences for Programs Degrees in Computing and Information Technology Under the Society 5.0 Paradigm. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(2), 208-214. doi:10.1109/RITA.2022.3167006.
  • Bachhofer, M.; Wildenberg, M. (2010). FCMappers. (http://www.fcmappers.net).
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
  • Banini, G. A.; Bearman, R. A. (1998). Application of fuzzy cognitive maps to factors affecting slurry rheology. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 52(4), 233-244. doi:10.1016/S0301-7516(97)00071-9.
  • Bilbao-Quintana, N.; Romero-Andonegui, A.; Portillo-Berasaluce, J.; López-de-la-Serna, A. (2022). Escape room digital para el desarrollo del aprendizaje colaborativo en educación superior. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23. doi:10.14201/eks27126.
  • Cabero-Almenara, J.; Valencia-Ortiz, R.; Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2022). E -learning in times of COVID-19. What have we learned? . IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (17), 14-26. doi:10.46661/ijeri.6361.
  • Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M.; Gallego-Arrufat, M. J.; Cebrián-Robles, V. (2021). Multimedia Annotations for Practical Collaborative Reasoning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 264-278. doi:10.7821/naer.2021.7.664.
  • Chiu, Y. B.; Lin, C. P.; Tang, L. L. (2005). Gender differs: assessing a model of online purchase intentions in e-tail service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(5), 416-435. doi:10.1108/09564230510625741.
  • Codara, L. (1998). Le Mappe Cognitive. Roma: Carocci Editore.
  • Curia, L.; Lavalle, A. (2011). Estrategias de decisión en sistemas dinámicos: aplicando mapas cognitivos difusos aplicación a un ejemplo socio-económico. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 8(3), 663-680. doi:10.4301/S1807-17752011000300008.
  • da Silva Santos, L. R. ., Souza-Pinho, M. J. ., Santos de Jesus, M. ., & Kalil, A. (2022). Educational games in the high school: implicate future teachers in the pursuit for new teaching strategies. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (17), 27-44. doi:10.46661/ijeri.4574.
  • Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sciencie, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  • Dwyer, C. (2007). Digital relationships in the MySpace generation: results from a qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 19-19).
  • Dwyer, C.; Hiltz, S.; Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 9-12).
  • Fabra Brell, E.; Roig-Vila, R. (2022). Flipped Learning, vídeos y autonomía de aprendizaje en Música: impacto en familias y adolescentes [Flipped Learning, videos and learning autonomy in music: impact on families and adolescents]. Pixel-Bit, Revista De Medios Y Educacion,(65), 95-120. doi:10.12795/pixelbit.93549.
  • Falla-Falcón, N.; López-Meneses, E.; Aubry, A. C.; García-Ordaz, M. (2022). La supervisión de la enseñanza no presencial en centros educativos no universitarios. Campus Virtuales, 11(2), 161-177. doi:10.54988/cv.2022.2.1198.
  • García-Holgado, A.; Vázquez-Ingelmo, A.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.; Conde, M. J. R. (2021). Improvement of learning outcomes in software engineering: active methodologies supported through the virtual campus. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16(2), 143-153. doi:10.1109/RITA.2021.3089926.
  • García-Río, E.; Baena-Luna, P.; Palos-Sánchez, P.; Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2022). Microblogging: an online resource to support education and training processes. Campus Virtuales, 11(2), 39-48. doi:10.54988/cv.2022.2.1013.
  • González-Martínez, J. (2022). Voltear para repensar: Reflexiones tecnopedagógicas sobre una experiencia Flipped Learning en la formación de Maestros [Flipping to Rethink: Technopedagogical Reflections on a Flipped Learning Experience in Teacher Education]. Pixel-Bit, Revista De Medios Y Educacion, (65), 39-63. doi:10.12795/pixelbit.93545.
  • Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C.; Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2022a). Análisis de la virtualización de la docencia en el Máster de Turismo de la Universidad de Huelva durante el COVID-19: docentes versus estudiantes. Campus Virtuales, 11(2), 197-208. doi:10.54988/cv.2022.2.1199.
  • Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C.; Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2022b). Key factors in the success of virtualization of teaching in Spanish universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(2), 277-294. doi:10.7821/naer.2022.7.1002.
  • Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C.; Gallardo-Pérez, J.; Martínez-López, F. J. (2022). Key Factors in the Implementation of E-Proctoring in the Spanish University System. Sustainability, 14(13), 8112. doi:10.3390/su14138112.
  • Marakas, G. M.; Yi, M. Y.; Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 129-163. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.126.
  • Marcos-Pablos, S.; García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(4), 1139-1176. doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10118-6.
  • Moore, G. C.; Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192.
  • Morales Salas, R. E.; Rodríguez Pavón, P. R. (2022). Retos y desafíos en la Educación Superior: una mirada desde la percepción de los docentes. Education in the knowledge society, 23, e26420. doi:10.14201/eks.26420.
  • Mouratiadou, I.; Moran, D. (2007). Mapping public participation in the Water Framework Directive: A case study of the Pinios River Basin, Greece. Ecological economics, 62(1), 66-76. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.009.
  • Muñoz, F. (2008). La adopción de una innovación basada en la Web. Análisis y modelización de los mecanismos generadores de confianza. Granada (España): Universidad de Granada.
  • Nysveen, H.; Pedersen, P.; Thornbjørnsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330-346. doi:10.1177/0092070305276149.
  • Özesmi, U.; Özesmi, S. L. (2003). A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental management, 31(4), 0518-0531. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2841-1.
  • Palos-Sánchez, P. R.; Baena-Luna, P.; Badicu, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Human Resources Management: A Bibliometric Analysis. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), 2145631. doi:10.1080/08839514.2022.2145631.
  • Papageorgiou, E. I.; Salmerón, J. L. (2013). A Review of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Research During the Last Decade. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21(1), 66-79. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2201727.
  • Pattier, D.; Ferreira, P. D. (2022). El vídeo como recurso educativo en educación superior durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 [Video as an educational resource in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Pixel-Bit, Revista De Medios Y Educacion, (65), 183-208. doi:10.12795/pixelbit.93511.
  • Pozo-Sánchez, S., Lampropoulos, G., & López-Belmonte, J. (2022). Comparing Gamification Models in Higher Education Using Face-to-Face and Virtual Escape Rooms. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(2), 307-322. doi:10.7821/naer.2022.7.1025.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: Collier Macmillan.
  • Santana-Valencia, E. V.; Chávez-Melo, G. (2022). Teachers and Digital Educational Inclusion in Times of Crisis. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(2), 110-114. doi:10.1109/RITA.2022.3166878.
  • Tan, M.; Teo, T. S. H. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 1-42. doi:10.17705/1jais.00005.
  • Taylor, S.; Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and cross over effects in the theory of planned behaviour: a study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K.
  • Thompson, R. L.; Higgins, C. A.; Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143. doi:10.2307/249443.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G. (2000). Why Don´t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. doi:10.2307/3250981.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
  • Verdugo-Castro, S.; Sánchez-Gómez, M. C.; García-Holgado, A. (2022). Opiniones y percepciones sobre los estudios superiores STEM: un estudio de caso exploratorio en España. Education in the knowledge society, 23, e27529. doi:10.14201/eks.27529.
  • Willis, T. (2008). An Evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a Means of Understanding Online Social Networking Behavior. Estados Unidos: University of South Florida.
  • Zolait, A. H. S.; Mattila, M.; Sulaiman, A. (2009). The effect of User’s Informational- Based Readiness on innovation acceptance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 76-100. doi:10.1108/02652320910928236.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet