Por qué quienes investigan en enfermería deberían leer a Leo Strauss además de a Heidegger y Gadamer

  1. Juan Diego González Sanz
Revista:
La Torre del Virrey: revista de estudios culturales

ISSN: 1885-7353

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 32

Páginas: 120-129

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: La Torre del Virrey: revista de estudios culturales

Resumen

La filosofía clásica mantiene abierta la cuestión sobre la posibilidad de identificar verdades universales, independientes del momento histórico en que vive el filósofo. Tras el giro anti-metafísico, las ciencias de todo tipo (y la enfermería entre ellas) han dejado a un lado esta cuestión. En la literatura científica enfermera de los últimos años se observa un incremento progresivo de menciones a pensadores como Martin Heidegger y Hans-Georg Gadamer. Dado el nivel de sutileza de algunos de sus planteamientos filosóficos, podría ocurrir que el pensamiento enfermero estuviese incorporando premisas de estos autores sin someterlas a una crítica rigurosa. Una de las más relevantes es la premisa historicista, que puede resumirse como la negación de la posibilidad de acceder a un conocimiento que supere los límites culturales de cada época histórica. Teniendo una indudable relevancia epistemológica para el conocimiento enfermero, pocos investigadores han abordado esta cuestión en el campo de la enfermería. Las obras de Leo Strauss contienen reflexiones críticas sobre el historicismo de Heidegger y Gadamer. La lectura de estas obras puede ayudar a los investigadores enfermeros a conocer con más detalle la premisa historicista y poder así analizar qué influencia está teniendo en el pensamiento enfermero.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • MARGIE BURNS Y SHELLEY PEACOCK, ‘Interpretive phenomenological methodologists in nursing: A critical analysis and comparison’, Nursing Inquiry, 26(2) (2019)
  • BLAKE PECK Y JANE MUMMERY, ‘Engaging Gadamer and qualia for the mot juste of individualised care’, Nursing Inquiry, 26(2) (2019)
  • JANNE B. DAMSGAARD, ‘Phenomenology and hermeneutics as a basis for sensitivity within health care’, Nursing Philosophy, 22(1) (2021)
  • TINA KOCH, ‘Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: philosophy, rigour and representation’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1) (1996), pp. 174-184
  • MICHAEL CROTTY, Phenomenology and nursing research, Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne, 1996.
  • JOHN PALEY, ‘Misinterpretive phenomenology: Heidegger, ontology and nursing research’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(4) (1998), pp. 817-824
  • ‘Heidegger, lived experience and method’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 70(7) (2014), pp. 1520-1531.
  • Phenomenology as qualitative research: A critical analysis of meaning attribution, Routledge, Abingdon, 2017;
  • ‘Meaning, lived experience, empathy and boredom: Max van Manen on phenomenology and Heidegger’, Nursing Philosophy, 19 (2018)
  • OLGA PETROVSKAYA, ‘Domesticating Paley: how we misread Paley (and phenomenology)’, Nursing Philosophy, 15(1) (2014), pp. 72-75.
  • ‘Is there nursing phenomenology after Paley? Essay on rigorous reading’, Nursing Philosophy, 15(1) (2014), pp. 60-71
  • MAX VAN MANEN, ‘But is it phenomenology?’, Qualitative Health Research, 27(6) (2017), pp. 775-779
  • ‘Phenomenology and meaning attribution [Review essay on the book Phenomenology as qualitative research: A critical analysis of meaning attribution, by John Paley]’, Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 17 (1) (2017), pp. 1-12
  • DAN ZAHAVI Y KRISTIAN M.M. MARTINY, ‘Phenomenology in nursing studies: New perspectives’, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 93 (2019), pp. 155-162.
  • VALERIE FLEMING E IVONNE ROBB, ‘A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian based research method’, Nursing Inquiry, 26(2) (2019)
  • BEGOÑA ERRASTI‐IBARRONDO, JOSÉ ANTONIO JORDÁN, MERCEDES PÉREZ DÍEZ‐DEL‐CORRAL Y MARÍA ARANTZAMENDI, ‘van Manen's phenomenology of practice: How can it contribute to nursing?’, Nursing Inquiry, 26(1) (2019)
  • DAN ZAHAVI, ‘The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen’, Nursing Philosophy, 21 (2020)
  • JULIE FRECHETTE, VASILIKI BITZAS, MONIQUE AUBRY, KELLEY KILPATRICK Y MÉLANIE LAVOIE-TREMBLAY, ‘Capturing lived experience: Methodological considerations for interpretive phenomenological inquiry’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 (2020), pp. 1-12.
  • SALLY THORNE, JENNIFER STEPHENS Y TRACY TRUANT, ‘Building qualitative study design using nursing’s disciplinary epistemology’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(2) (2016), pp. 451–460.
  • FRANCISCO JOSÉ CALAZANS FALCON, ‘Historicismo: antigás e novas questoes’, História Revista, 7 (1/2) (2002), pp. 23-54.
  • JOSÉ ORTEGA Y GASSET, ‘En torno a Galileo’, en Obras completas. Tomo V, Revista de Occidente, Madrid, 1964 [1933], pp. 11-164
  • LEO STRAUSS Y JOSEPH CROPSEY, History of political philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987
  • LEO STRAUSS, ‘On Collingwood's philosophy of history’, Review of Metaphysics, 5(4) (1952), pp. 559- 586
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, ‘Correspondence with Hans-Georg Gadamer Concerning Wahrheit und Methode’, The Independent Journal of Philosophy/Unabhängige Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2(5) (1978)
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, The city and man, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, Studies in Platonic political philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, Persecution and the art of writing, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, What is political philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, Liberalism ancient and modern, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, Natural right and history. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000
  • HANS-GEORG GADAMER, On tyranny: including the Strauss-Kojève correspondence, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000.
  • KENNETH H. GREEN, ‘The challenge of Leo Strauss to Emil L. Fackenheim: Heidegger, radical historicism and diabolical evil’, La torre del Virrey, 7 (2010), pp. 81-93.
  • WILLIAM H. F. ALTMAN, The German Stranger: Leo Strauss and National Socialism, Lexington Books, Lanham (Maryland), 2011.
  • LEORA BATNITZKY, ‘Leo Strauss’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition). Edición de EDWARD N. ZALTA. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/strauss-leo/#Cont.
  • MARK RISJORD, Nursing knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2010.
  • JANICE L. THOMPSON, ‘Practical discourse in nursing going beyond empiricism and historicism’, Advances in Nursing Science, 7(4) (1985), pp. 59-71
  • MARY C. SILVA Y DANIEL ROTHBART, ‘An analysis of changing trends in philosophies of science on nursing theory development and testing’, Advances in Nursing Science, 6(2) (1984), pp. 1-11
  • XABIER IRIGIBEL-URIZ, ‘Revisión crítica de una interpretación del pensamiento de Virginia Henderson: Acercamiento epistemológico al libro de Luis, Fernández y Navarro’, Index de Enfermería, 16(57) (2007), pp. 55-59
  • BARBARA CULL-WILBY Y JACINTHE I. PEPIN, ‘Towards a coexistence of paradigms in nursing knowledge development’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(4) (1987), pp. 515-521
  • PATRICIA J. SCHAFER, Philosophic analysis of a theory of clinical nursing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1986.
  • CHRISTINE H. K. OU, WENDY A. HALL Y SALLY THORNE, ‘Can nursing epistemology embrace p‐values?’, Nursing Philosophy, 18(4) (2017)
  • “We caution that the uncritical acceptance of any mechanism that is presumed to generate undisputed evidence would be problematic for the nature of the nursing discipline and nursing epistemology”.
  • GARY ROLFE, ‘Foundations for a human science of nursing: Gadamer, Laing and the hermeneutics of caring’, Nursing Philosophy, 16(3) (2014), pp. 141- 152
  • JOSÉ GRANERO-MOLINA, CAYETANO FERNÁNDEZ-SOLA, JOSÉ MARÍA MUÑOZ TERRÓN Y CAYETANO ARANDA TORRES, ‘Habermasian knowledge interests: Epistemological implications for health sciences’, Nursing Philosophy, 16(2) (2015), pp. 77-86.
  • SONYA GRYPMA, ‘Florence Nightingale´s changing image? Part I. Nightingale the Feminist, Statiscian and Nurse’, Journal of Christian Nursing, 22 (3) (2005), pp. 22-28
  • ‘Florence Nightingale`s changing image? Part II. From Saint to Fiend to Modern Mystic’, Journal of Christian Nursing, 22 (4) (2005), pp. 6-13
  • LEO STRAUSS Y HANS-GEORG GADAMER, ‘Correspondence with Hans-Georg Gadamer Concerning Wahrheit und Methode’. Disponible en castellano en Sin ciudades no hay filósofos. Edición de Antonio Lastra y Raúl Miranda, Tecnos, Valencia, 2014
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet