Aspects to be taken into account by teachers for the correct use of Moodle as a support tool for face-to-face teaching

  1. Alfonso Infante-Moro 1
  2. Juan C. Infante-Moro 1
  3. Julia Gallardo-Pérez 1
  4. Thi-Loc Nguyen 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

  2. 2 University of Da Nang
    info

    University of Da Nang

    Da Nang, Vietnam

    ROR https://ror.org/03ecpp171

Journal:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 13

Issue: 2

Pages: 215-224

Type: Article

DOI: 10.54988/CV.2024.2.1587 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Campus Virtuales

Abstract

Moodle has become the tool that supports face-to-face teaching in many degrees and universities, but this tool can have the opposite effect to support, and can lead to information and material overload in many students or can even encourage student absenteeism because all the subject material is on Moodle. Given this situation, this study has identified, through the Delphi methodology and based on the judgement of experts, aspects and indications to take into account in its use in order to achieve an effective use of Moodle as a support tool for face-to-face teaching (avoiding information overload and discouraging absenteeism) and to enrich the training process of students in degrees and universities that use Moodle.

Bibliographic References

  • Araújo, J. F.; Sales, L. M.; Silva, C. A.; Silva, H. D. (2024). Virtual Environment for Teaching and Learning in Residential Electrical Installations Projects. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 19, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2024.3368368.
  • Ayala-Mora, J.; Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C. (2023). Electronic administration in the Council of the Judiciary of Ecuador [La administración electrónica en el Consejo de la Judicatura de Ecuador]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao,(E60), 511-523.
  • Bitchikashvili, T.; Petriashvili, L.; Jang, L. K. (2023). Digitalization of management of a higher educational institution, national and international challenges and ways of solution. World Science, 3(81). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30092023/8032.
  • Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36.
  • Brink, H.; Packmohr, S.; Vogelsang, K. (2020). The digitalization of universities from a students’ perspective. In 6th international conference on higher education advances (HEAd’20) (pp. 967-974). Universitat Politècnica de València.
  • Cabero Almenara, J.; Infante Moro, A. (2014). Empleo del método Delphi y su empleo en la investigación en comunicación y educación. Edutec, 48, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2014.48.187
  • Clarenc, C. A. (2013). Análisis comparativo de LMS. Lulu.com.
  • de Lahidalga, I. R. M. (2008). Moodle, la plataforma para la enseñanza y organización escolar. Ikastorratza, e-Revista de didáctica, (2), 3-12.
  • Esanov, B.; Musto, J.; Dahanayake, A. (2021). Information Quality and Usability Assessment of Virtual Campus Journey Apps. In International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (pp. 583-597). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Estepa Maestre, F.; Gutiérrez Sánchez, J. D.; Vallejo Andrada, A. (2024). Qualitative tools and ICTs in university teaching: an experience from Social Sciences [Herramientas cualitativas y TICs en la enseñanza universitaria: una experiencia desde las Ciencias Sociales]. Campus Virtuales, 13(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2024.1.1137.
  • Fauzi, M.; Jhoni, M,; Mohammad, D. M.; Mabruroh, F. M.; Oviyanti, F. (2024). Implementation of the Power of Blended Learning in the AI War Era in Indonesia: An Empirical Study [Implementación: El poder del blended learning en la era La guerra de la IA en la Indonesia]. Pixel-Bit, Revista De Medios Y Educacion, (70), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.103035.
  • Feret, B.; Marcinek, M. (1999). The future of the academic library and the academic librarian: a Delphi study. Librarian Career Development, 7(10), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/09680819910301898
  • Gallardo-Pérez, J.; Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C. (2023). The use of business simulators in the Master of Tourism at the University of Huelva: perception of its students [El uso de simuladores de negocios en el Máster de Turismo de la Universidad de huelva: percepción de sus estudiantes]. Campus Virtuales, 12(2), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2023.2.1499.
  • Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi Method, Futures Research Methodology AC/UNU Millennium Project.
  • Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C.; Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2022). Key factors to raise cybersecurity awareness among employees [Factores claves para concienciar la ciberseguridad en los empleados]. Revista de Pensamiento Estratégico y Seguridad CISDE, 7(1), 69-79.
  • Jacovkis, J.; Parcerisa, L.; Herrera-Urízar, G.; Folguera, S. (2024). Who Do Digital Platforms Educate? Equity and Educational Ethics in a Post-Pandemic Context [¿ A quién educan las plataformas digitales? Equidad y ética educativa en un contexto de post pandemia]. Education in the Knowledge Society, 25, e30444. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.30444.
  • Landeta, J. (2002). El método Delphi: una técnica de previsión para la incertidumbre. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • León, G.; Montero, I. (2004). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Malla, F. G.; Zabala, I. (1978). La previsión del futuro en la empresa (III): El método Delphi. Estudios Empresariales, 39, 13-24.
  • Nguyen, T.-L.; Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C. (2024). Generation Z’s followers on hotel’ social networking sites: Motivational factors from a theory of planned behavior approach [Seguidores de la generación Z en los sitios de redes sociales del hotel: factores motivacionales desde el enfoque de la teoría del comportamiento planificado]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, (E66), 340-354.
  • OpenAI (2024). ChatGPT [Cuáles son los aspectos a tener en cuenta por el profesorado para un correcto uso de Moodle como herramienta de apoyo a la enseñanza presencial para que esta herramienta se convierta en una herramienta de acompañamiento en los estudios para los estudiantes y no llegue a provocar la saturación de información en estos ni tampoco a incentivar su absentismo por estar todo el material de las asignaturas en Moodle]. (https://chat.openai.com/).
  • Perez-Poch, A.; López, D. (2017). Just-in-time teaching improves engagement and academic results among students at risk of failure in computer science fundamentals. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
  • Pla-García, C.; Roman-Coy, D.; Serradell-Lopez, E. (2024). Blended Learning: is face-to-face in online training programs important?[Blended Learning: ¿es importante la presencialidad en programas de formación online?]. Campus Virtuales, 13(1), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2024.1.1442
  • Rizo Rodríguez, M. (2019). Aprendizaje con MOODLE. Revista Multi-Ensayos, 4(8), 18-25.
  • Rodríguez Pavón, P. R.; Morales Salas, R. E.; Infante-Moro, A.; Infante-Moro, J. C. (2024). The Nominal Group Technique as a tool to select items that measure the level of digital skills in postgraduate students. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (21), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.9393.
  • Skulmoski, G. J.; Hartman, F. T.; Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21.
  • Villar-Aguilés, A.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, D. (2024). Complex trajectories in higher education students: online and face-to-face universities. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-023-00006-1.
Data source: Dialnet